碰撞速度与商业卡车-自行车事故中骑自行车者严重伤害和死亡风险的关系。

Q2 Medicine
Yasuhiro Matsui, Shoko Oikawa, Kazuhiro Sorimachi, Akira Imanishi, Takeshi Fujimura
{"title":"碰撞速度与商业卡车-自行车事故中骑自行车者严重伤害和死亡风险的关系。","authors":"Yasuhiro Matsui,&nbsp;Shoko Oikawa,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Sorimachi,&nbsp;Akira Imanishi,&nbsp;Takeshi Fujimura","doi":"10.4271/2017-22-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to clarify the relationship between truck-cyclist collision impact velocity and the serious-injury and fatality risks to cyclists, and to investigate the effects of road type and driving scenario on the frequency of cyclist fatalities due to collisions with vehicles. We used micro and macro truck-cyclist collision data from the Japanese Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis (ITARDA) database. We classified vehicle type into five categories: heavy-duty trucks (gross vehicle weight [GVW] ≥11 × 10<sup>3</sup> kg [11 tons (t)], medium-duty trucks (5 × 10<sup>3</sup> kg [5 t] ≤ GVW < 11 × 10<sup>3</sup> kg [11 t]), light-duty trucks (GVW <5 × 10<sup>3</sup> kg [5 t]), box vans, and sedans. The fatality risk was ≤5% for light-duty trucks, box vans, and sedans at impact velocities ≤40 km/h and for medium-duty trucks at impact velocities ≤30 km/h. The fatality risk was 6% for heavy-duty trucks at impact velocities ≤10 km/h. Thus, the fatality risk appears strongly associated with vehicle class and impact velocity. The results revealed that a 10 km/h reduction in impact velocities could mitigate the severity of cyclist injuries at impact velocities ≥30 km/h for all five vehicle types. The frequency of cyclist fatalities at intersections with traffic signals involving heavy-duty trucks was significantly higher during daytime than that at nighttime. Fatalities involving vehicles making a left turn generally increased with vehicle weight. The frequency of cyclist fatalities involving vehicles making a left turn was the largest for heavy-duty trucks both during daytime (67.6%) and at nighttime (52.3%).</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"61 ","pages":"355-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Impact Velocity with Serious-injury and Fatality Risks to Cyclists in Commercial Truck-Cyclist Accidents.\",\"authors\":\"Yasuhiro Matsui,&nbsp;Shoko Oikawa,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Sorimachi,&nbsp;Akira Imanishi,&nbsp;Takeshi Fujimura\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/2017-22-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to clarify the relationship between truck-cyclist collision impact velocity and the serious-injury and fatality risks to cyclists, and to investigate the effects of road type and driving scenario on the frequency of cyclist fatalities due to collisions with vehicles. We used micro and macro truck-cyclist collision data from the Japanese Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis (ITARDA) database. We classified vehicle type into five categories: heavy-duty trucks (gross vehicle weight [GVW] ≥11 × 10<sup>3</sup> kg [11 tons (t)], medium-duty trucks (5 × 10<sup>3</sup> kg [5 t] ≤ GVW < 11 × 10<sup>3</sup> kg [11 t]), light-duty trucks (GVW <5 × 10<sup>3</sup> kg [5 t]), box vans, and sedans. The fatality risk was ≤5% for light-duty trucks, box vans, and sedans at impact velocities ≤40 km/h and for medium-duty trucks at impact velocities ≤30 km/h. The fatality risk was 6% for heavy-duty trucks at impact velocities ≤10 km/h. Thus, the fatality risk appears strongly associated with vehicle class and impact velocity. The results revealed that a 10 km/h reduction in impact velocities could mitigate the severity of cyclist injuries at impact velocities ≥30 km/h for all five vehicle types. The frequency of cyclist fatalities at intersections with traffic signals involving heavy-duty trucks was significantly higher during daytime than that at nighttime. Fatalities involving vehicles making a left turn generally increased with vehicle weight. The frequency of cyclist fatalities involving vehicles making a left turn was the largest for heavy-duty trucks both during daytime (67.6%) and at nighttime (52.3%).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stapp car crash journal\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"355-371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stapp car crash journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-22-0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-22-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究旨在阐明卡车碰撞碰撞速度与骑自行车者重伤死亡风险的关系,并探讨道路类型和驾驶场景对骑自行车者碰撞死亡频率的影响。我们使用了来自日本交通事故研究和数据分析研究所(ITARDA)数据库的微观和宏观卡车-骑自行车者碰撞数据。我们将车辆类型分为五大类:重型卡车(车辆总重[GVW]≥11 × 103 kg[11吨(t)]、中型卡车(5 × 103 kg [5 t]≤GVW < 11 × 103 kg [11 t])、轻型卡车(GVW 3 kg [5 t])、箱式货车和轿车。碰撞速度≤40 km/h的轻型卡车、箱式货车和轿车以及碰撞速度≤30 km/h的中型卡车的死亡风险≤5%。对于碰撞速度≤10 km/h的重型卡车,死亡风险为6%。因此,死亡风险似乎与车辆类别和撞击速度密切相关。结果表明,在碰撞速度≥30 km/h时,降低10 km/h的碰撞速度可以减轻所有5种车辆类型的骑车人受伤的严重程度。在有重型卡车交通信号的十字路口,骑自行车的人死亡的频率在白天明显高于夜间。车辆左转造成的死亡人数通常随着车辆重量的增加而增加。重型卡车在白天(67.6%)和夜间(52.3%)因左转而死亡的频率最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of Impact Velocity with Serious-injury and Fatality Risks to Cyclists in Commercial Truck-Cyclist Accidents.

This study aimed to clarify the relationship between truck-cyclist collision impact velocity and the serious-injury and fatality risks to cyclists, and to investigate the effects of road type and driving scenario on the frequency of cyclist fatalities due to collisions with vehicles. We used micro and macro truck-cyclist collision data from the Japanese Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis (ITARDA) database. We classified vehicle type into five categories: heavy-duty trucks (gross vehicle weight [GVW] ≥11 × 103 kg [11 tons (t)], medium-duty trucks (5 × 103 kg [5 t] ≤ GVW < 11 × 103 kg [11 t]), light-duty trucks (GVW <5 × 103 kg [5 t]), box vans, and sedans. The fatality risk was ≤5% for light-duty trucks, box vans, and sedans at impact velocities ≤40 km/h and for medium-duty trucks at impact velocities ≤30 km/h. The fatality risk was 6% for heavy-duty trucks at impact velocities ≤10 km/h. Thus, the fatality risk appears strongly associated with vehicle class and impact velocity. The results revealed that a 10 km/h reduction in impact velocities could mitigate the severity of cyclist injuries at impact velocities ≥30 km/h for all five vehicle types. The frequency of cyclist fatalities at intersections with traffic signals involving heavy-duty trucks was significantly higher during daytime than that at nighttime. Fatalities involving vehicles making a left turn generally increased with vehicle weight. The frequency of cyclist fatalities involving vehicles making a left turn was the largest for heavy-duty trucks both during daytime (67.6%) and at nighttime (52.3%).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stapp car crash journal
Stapp car crash journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信