无家可归家庭回归住房不稳定的风险模型。

IF 0.4 Q4 URBAN STUDIES
Cityscape Pub Date : 2017-01-01
Zachary Glendening, Marybeth Shinn
{"title":"无家可归家庭回归住房不稳定的风险模型。","authors":"Zachary Glendening,&nbsp;Marybeth Shinn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study developed risk models for returns to housing instability (that is, homelessness and unstable doubling-up situations) among families exiting emergency shelter. Participants included 446 families randomly assigned to receive priority offers of long-term housing subsidies and 578 families randomly assigned to usual care in the Family Options Study, a multisite experiment designed to test the impact of various housing and service interventions for homeless families. Relationships between family features recorded at shelter entry and returns to housing instability 20 months later were examined empirically. Correlation, hierarchical logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to combine family features into predictive risk models. Results indicated that few observable family features beyond previous housing instability offered predictive utility. Access to long-term housing subsidies appears to reduce housing instability. Further research should examine whether disability benefits, reliable employment, or effective substance dependence treatment reduce housing instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":46856,"journal":{"name":"Cityscape","volume":"19 3","pages":"309-330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5760192/pdf/nihms927087.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Models for Returns to Housing Instability Among Families Experiencing Homelessness.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Glendening,&nbsp;Marybeth Shinn\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study developed risk models for returns to housing instability (that is, homelessness and unstable doubling-up situations) among families exiting emergency shelter. Participants included 446 families randomly assigned to receive priority offers of long-term housing subsidies and 578 families randomly assigned to usual care in the Family Options Study, a multisite experiment designed to test the impact of various housing and service interventions for homeless families. Relationships between family features recorded at shelter entry and returns to housing instability 20 months later were examined empirically. Correlation, hierarchical logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to combine family features into predictive risk models. Results indicated that few observable family features beyond previous housing instability offered predictive utility. Access to long-term housing subsidies appears to reduce housing instability. Further research should examine whether disability benefits, reliable employment, or effective substance dependence treatment reduce housing instability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cityscape\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"309-330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5760192/pdf/nihms927087.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cityscape\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cityscape","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究为离开紧急住所的家庭返回住房不稳定(即无家可归和不稳定的双重情况)建立了风险模型。在家庭选择研究中,参与者包括446个随机分配优先获得长期住房补贴的家庭和578个随机分配常规护理的家庭。家庭选择研究是一项多地点实验,旨在测试各种住房和服务干预对无家可归家庭的影响。在进入庇护所时记录的家庭特征与20个月后返回住房不稳定之间的关系进行了实证研究。采用相关性、层次逻辑回归和受试者工作特征曲线将家族特征结合到预测风险模型中。结果表明,除了以前的住房不稳定之外,几乎没有可观察到的家庭特征提供预测效用。获得长期住房补贴似乎减少了住房的不稳定性。进一步的研究应该检查是否残疾福利,可靠的就业,或有效的物质依赖治疗减少住房不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Risk Models for Returns to Housing Instability Among Families Experiencing Homelessness.

Risk Models for Returns to Housing Instability Among Families Experiencing Homelessness.

This study developed risk models for returns to housing instability (that is, homelessness and unstable doubling-up situations) among families exiting emergency shelter. Participants included 446 families randomly assigned to receive priority offers of long-term housing subsidies and 578 families randomly assigned to usual care in the Family Options Study, a multisite experiment designed to test the impact of various housing and service interventions for homeless families. Relationships between family features recorded at shelter entry and returns to housing instability 20 months later were examined empirically. Correlation, hierarchical logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to combine family features into predictive risk models. Results indicated that few observable family features beyond previous housing instability offered predictive utility. Access to long-term housing subsidies appears to reduce housing instability. Further research should examine whether disability benefits, reliable employment, or effective substance dependence treatment reduce housing instability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cityscape
Cityscape URBAN STUDIES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信