R Aileen Yingst, B A Cohen, L Crumpler, M E Schmidt, C M Schrader
{"title":"在月球上测试受火星启发的半自主月球车操作策略:新墨西哥州的地理启发式操作策略测试。","authors":"R Aileen Yingst, B A Cohen, L Crumpler, M E Schmidt, C M Schrader","doi":"10.1555/mars.2011.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We tested the science operational strategy used for the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) mission on Mars to determine its suitability for conducting remote geology on the Moon by conducting a field test at Cerro de Santa Clara, New Mexico. This region contains volcanic and sedimentary products from a variety of provenances, mimicking the variety that might be found at a lunar site such as South Pole-Aitken Basin.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>At each site a Science Team broke down observational \"days\" into a sequence of observations of features and targets of interest. The number, timing, and sequence of observations was chosen to mimic those used by the MERs when traversing. Images simulating high-resolution stereo and hand lens-scale images were taken using a professional SLR digital camera; multispectral and XRD data were acquired from samples to mimic the availability of geochemical data. A separate Tiger Team followed the Science Team and examined each site using traditional terrestrial field methods, facilitating comparison between what was revealed by human versus rover-inspired methods.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>We conclude from this field test that MER-inspired methodology is not conducive to utilizing all acquired data in a timely manner for the case of any lunar architecture that involves the acquisition of rover data in near real-time. We additionally conclude that a methodology similar to that used for MER can be adapted for use on the Moon if mission goals are focused on reconnaissance. If the goal is to locate and identify a specific feature or material, such as water ice, a different methodology will likely be needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":92263,"journal":{"name":"Mars (Los Angeles, Calif.)","volume":"6 ","pages":"13-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing Mars-inspired operational strategies for semi-autonomous rovers on the Moon: The GeoHeuristic Operational Strategies Test in New Mexico.\",\"authors\":\"R Aileen Yingst, B A Cohen, L Crumpler, M E Schmidt, C M Schrader\",\"doi\":\"10.1555/mars.2011.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We tested the science operational strategy used for the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) mission on Mars to determine its suitability for conducting remote geology on the Moon by conducting a field test at Cerro de Santa Clara, New Mexico. This region contains volcanic and sedimentary products from a variety of provenances, mimicking the variety that might be found at a lunar site such as South Pole-Aitken Basin.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>At each site a Science Team broke down observational \\\"days\\\" into a sequence of observations of features and targets of interest. The number, timing, and sequence of observations was chosen to mimic those used by the MERs when traversing. Images simulating high-resolution stereo and hand lens-scale images were taken using a professional SLR digital camera; multispectral and XRD data were acquired from samples to mimic the availability of geochemical data. A separate Tiger Team followed the Science Team and examined each site using traditional terrestrial field methods, facilitating comparison between what was revealed by human versus rover-inspired methods.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>We conclude from this field test that MER-inspired methodology is not conducive to utilizing all acquired data in a timely manner for the case of any lunar architecture that involves the acquisition of rover data in near real-time. We additionally conclude that a methodology similar to that used for MER can be adapted for use on the Moon if mission goals are focused on reconnaissance. If the goal is to locate and identify a specific feature or material, such as water ice, a different methodology will likely be needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mars (Los Angeles, Calif.)\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"13-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754929/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mars (Los Angeles, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1555/mars.2011.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/12/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mars (Los Angeles, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1555/mars.2011.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:我们在新墨西哥州的Cerro de Santa Clara进行了现场测试,测试了火星探测漫游者(MER)任务在火星上使用的科学操作策略,以确定其是否适合在月球上进行远程地质研究。这个地区包含了各种来源的火山和沉积产物,模仿了月球南极-艾特肯盆地等地点可能发现的多样性。方法:在每个地点,一个科学小组将观测“天”分解成一系列对感兴趣的特征和目标的观测。选择观察的数量、时间和顺序是为了模仿MERs在遍历时使用的观察。使用专业单反数码相机拍摄模拟高分辨率立体图像和手镜头尺度图像;从样品中获取多光谱和XRD数据以模拟地球化学数据的可用性。一个单独的老虎小组跟随科学小组,使用传统的陆地实地方法检查了每个地点,促进了人类和漫游者启发的方法之间的比较。经验教训:我们从现场测试中得出结论,对于任何涉及近实时获取月球车数据的月球结构,mer启发的方法都不利于及时利用所有获得的数据。我们还得出结论,如果任务目标集中在侦察上,那么类似于MER的方法可以适用于月球。如果目标是定位和识别特定的特征或材料,例如水冰,则可能需要不同的方法。
Testing Mars-inspired operational strategies for semi-autonomous rovers on the Moon: The GeoHeuristic Operational Strategies Test in New Mexico.
Background: We tested the science operational strategy used for the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) mission on Mars to determine its suitability for conducting remote geology on the Moon by conducting a field test at Cerro de Santa Clara, New Mexico. This region contains volcanic and sedimentary products from a variety of provenances, mimicking the variety that might be found at a lunar site such as South Pole-Aitken Basin.
Method: At each site a Science Team broke down observational "days" into a sequence of observations of features and targets of interest. The number, timing, and sequence of observations was chosen to mimic those used by the MERs when traversing. Images simulating high-resolution stereo and hand lens-scale images were taken using a professional SLR digital camera; multispectral and XRD data were acquired from samples to mimic the availability of geochemical data. A separate Tiger Team followed the Science Team and examined each site using traditional terrestrial field methods, facilitating comparison between what was revealed by human versus rover-inspired methods.
Lessons learned: We conclude from this field test that MER-inspired methodology is not conducive to utilizing all acquired data in a timely manner for the case of any lunar architecture that involves the acquisition of rover data in near real-time. We additionally conclude that a methodology similar to that used for MER can be adapted for use on the Moon if mission goals are focused on reconnaissance. If the goal is to locate and identify a specific feature or material, such as water ice, a different methodology will likely be needed.