心肌灌注显像对糖尿病患者的预后评估:糖尿病仍然是冠状动脉疾病。

The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2017-08-11 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874192401711010076
Andrea De Lorenzo, Victor F Souza, Leticia Glerian, Ronaldo Sl Lima
{"title":"心肌灌注显像对糖尿病患者的预后评估:糖尿病仍然是冠状动脉疾病。","authors":"Andrea De Lorenzo,&nbsp;Victor F Souza,&nbsp;Leticia Glerian,&nbsp;Ronaldo Sl Lima","doi":"10.2174/1874192401711010076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Even though diabetes mellitus (DM) has been considered a \"Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) equivalent\", that is still controversial, especially in a contemporary population subject to optimized treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the cardiovascular risk of diabetics by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent MPS from 2008 to 2012 were studied. Perfusion scores were calculated, and abnormal MPS was defined as a summed stress score >3. Patients were followed for 3±1 years for all-cause death, which was compared between patients with DM (without known CAD) and patients with known CAD but without DM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3409 patients, 471 (13.8%) were diabetics without known CAD (DM group) and 638 (18.7%) had CAD without diabetes (CAD group). Annualized death rates were not significantly different between DM or CAD patients (0.9 <i>vs</i> 1.5%, p=0.09). With normal MPS, death rates were 0.7% for DM and 0.6% for CAD (p=0.8). With abnormal MPS, death rates increased similarly in the DM and CAD groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In diabetic patients without known CAD, the rate of death was not significantly different from patients with prior CAD and without DM. Abnormal MPS increased risk similarly in diabetic patients and in those with CAD. These findings suggest that DM may still be considered a high-risk condition, comparable to known CAD, and effectively stratified by MPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":504447,"journal":{"name":"The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal","volume":"11 ","pages":"76-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721334/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Assessment of Diabetics Using Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Diabetes Mellitus is Still a Coronary Artery Disease Equivalent.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea De Lorenzo,&nbsp;Victor F Souza,&nbsp;Leticia Glerian,&nbsp;Ronaldo Sl Lima\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874192401711010076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Even though diabetes mellitus (DM) has been considered a \\\"Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) equivalent\\\", that is still controversial, especially in a contemporary population subject to optimized treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the cardiovascular risk of diabetics by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent MPS from 2008 to 2012 were studied. Perfusion scores were calculated, and abnormal MPS was defined as a summed stress score >3. Patients were followed for 3±1 years for all-cause death, which was compared between patients with DM (without known CAD) and patients with known CAD but without DM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3409 patients, 471 (13.8%) were diabetics without known CAD (DM group) and 638 (18.7%) had CAD without diabetes (CAD group). Annualized death rates were not significantly different between DM or CAD patients (0.9 <i>vs</i> 1.5%, p=0.09). With normal MPS, death rates were 0.7% for DM and 0.6% for CAD (p=0.8). With abnormal MPS, death rates increased similarly in the DM and CAD groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In diabetic patients without known CAD, the rate of death was not significantly different from patients with prior CAD and without DM. Abnormal MPS increased risk similarly in diabetic patients and in those with CAD. These findings suggest that DM may still be considered a high-risk condition, comparable to known CAD, and effectively stratified by MPS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":504447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"76-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721334/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874192401711010076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874192401711010076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:尽管糖尿病(DM)被认为是“冠状动脉疾病(CAD)等同物”,但这仍然存在争议,特别是在当代人群中接受优化治疗的人群中。目的:应用心肌灌注显像(MPS)评价糖尿病患者的心血管风险。方法:对2008 ~ 2012年连续接受MPS治疗的患者进行研究。计算灌注评分,以应激总分>3为MPS异常。结果:3409例患者中,无已知CAD的糖尿病患者(DM组)471例(13.8%),无已知CAD的冠心病患者(CAD组)638例(18.7%),无糖尿病的冠心病患者(CAD组)。DM和CAD患者的年化死亡率无显著差异(0.9 vs 1.5%, p=0.09)。MPS正常时,DM的死亡率为0.7%,CAD的死亡率为0.6% (p=0.8)。MPS异常时,DM组和CAD组的死亡率增加相似。结论:在没有已知CAD的糖尿病患者中,死亡率与有CAD病史和无DM的患者无显著差异。MPS异常增加的风险在糖尿病患者和有CAD的患者中相似。这些发现表明,糖尿病可能仍被认为是一种高风险疾病,与已知的CAD相当,并可通过MPS有效分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prognostic Assessment of Diabetics Using Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Diabetes Mellitus is Still a Coronary Artery Disease Equivalent.

Prognostic Assessment of Diabetics Using Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Diabetes Mellitus is Still a Coronary Artery Disease Equivalent.

Prognostic Assessment of Diabetics Using Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Diabetes Mellitus is Still a Coronary Artery Disease Equivalent.

Background: Even though diabetes mellitus (DM) has been considered a "Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) equivalent", that is still controversial, especially in a contemporary population subject to optimized treatment.

Objective: We aimed to assess the cardiovascular risk of diabetics by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS).

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent MPS from 2008 to 2012 were studied. Perfusion scores were calculated, and abnormal MPS was defined as a summed stress score >3. Patients were followed for 3±1 years for all-cause death, which was compared between patients with DM (without known CAD) and patients with known CAD but without DM.

Results: Among 3409 patients, 471 (13.8%) were diabetics without known CAD (DM group) and 638 (18.7%) had CAD without diabetes (CAD group). Annualized death rates were not significantly different between DM or CAD patients (0.9 vs 1.5%, p=0.09). With normal MPS, death rates were 0.7% for DM and 0.6% for CAD (p=0.8). With abnormal MPS, death rates increased similarly in the DM and CAD groups.

Conclusions: In diabetic patients without known CAD, the rate of death was not significantly different from patients with prior CAD and without DM. Abnormal MPS increased risk similarly in diabetic patients and in those with CAD. These findings suggest that DM may still be considered a high-risk condition, comparable to known CAD, and effectively stratified by MPS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信