中国教师的社会可取性

Journal of applied measurement Pub Date : 2017-01-01
Randall E Schumacker, Cathy Ka Weng Hoi
{"title":"中国教师的社会可取性","authors":"Randall E Schumacker,&nbsp;Cathy Ka Weng Hoi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research has suggested that self-reported responses on surveys can be affected by a participant's tendency toward social desirability, which would prevent them from revealing their true feelings or behaviors. Researchers should provide evidence that their results have not been affected by socially desirable responses using the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MC-SDS). Past research has used the 33-item original form and 13-item short form of the MC-SDS, although a few researchers have found questionable validation of the 13 item MC-SDS in several populations. Traditional factor analysis failed to converge on a factor structure. Therefore, the current research was conducted using a Rasch dichotomous model analysis on the original 33-item MC-SDS, a 20-item MC-SDS, and the 13-item MC-SDS. Findings indicated that the 33-item MC-SDS had several overlapping items, the 20-item MC-SDS provided a somewhat meaningful measure of social desirability, and the 13-item MC-SDS did not provide sufficient item distribution or separation to produce a meaningful measure. A researcher should check on the factor structure of the MC-SDS when using it in their research, especially with different cultural populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"18 4","pages":"408-419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Desirability Amongst Chinese Teachers.\",\"authors\":\"Randall E Schumacker,&nbsp;Cathy Ka Weng Hoi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research has suggested that self-reported responses on surveys can be affected by a participant's tendency toward social desirability, which would prevent them from revealing their true feelings or behaviors. Researchers should provide evidence that their results have not been affected by socially desirable responses using the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MC-SDS). Past research has used the 33-item original form and 13-item short form of the MC-SDS, although a few researchers have found questionable validation of the 13 item MC-SDS in several populations. Traditional factor analysis failed to converge on a factor structure. Therefore, the current research was conducted using a Rasch dichotomous model analysis on the original 33-item MC-SDS, a 20-item MC-SDS, and the 13-item MC-SDS. Findings indicated that the 33-item MC-SDS had several overlapping items, the 20-item MC-SDS provided a somewhat meaningful measure of social desirability, and the 13-item MC-SDS did not provide sufficient item distribution or separation to produce a meaningful measure. A researcher should check on the factor structure of the MC-SDS when using it in their research, especially with different cultural populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"408-419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,调查中自我报告的回答可能会受到参与者对社会可取性的倾向的影响,这将阻止他们透露自己的真实感受或行为。研究人员应该提供证据,证明他们的结果没有受到使用marlow - crown社会期望量表(MC-SDS)的社会期望反应的影响。过去的研究使用了MC-SDS的33项原始形式和13项简短形式,尽管一些研究人员发现13项MC-SDS在几个人群中的有效性存在问题。传统的因子分析无法收敛到一个因子结构上。因此,本研究采用Rasch二分类模型对原始的33项MC-SDS、20项MC-SDS和13项MC-SDS进行分析。研究结果表明,33项MC-SDS量表有多个重叠的项目,20项MC-SDS量表对社会期望程度的测量有一定意义,而13项MC-SDS量表没有提供足够的项目分布或分离来产生有意义的测量。研究人员在使用MC-SDS进行研究时应检查其因子结构,特别是在不同文化人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Desirability Amongst Chinese Teachers.

Research has suggested that self-reported responses on surveys can be affected by a participant's tendency toward social desirability, which would prevent them from revealing their true feelings or behaviors. Researchers should provide evidence that their results have not been affected by socially desirable responses using the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MC-SDS). Past research has used the 33-item original form and 13-item short form of the MC-SDS, although a few researchers have found questionable validation of the 13 item MC-SDS in several populations. Traditional factor analysis failed to converge on a factor structure. Therefore, the current research was conducted using a Rasch dichotomous model analysis on the original 33-item MC-SDS, a 20-item MC-SDS, and the 13-item MC-SDS. Findings indicated that the 33-item MC-SDS had several overlapping items, the 20-item MC-SDS provided a somewhat meaningful measure of social desirability, and the 13-item MC-SDS did not provide sufficient item distribution or separation to produce a meaningful measure. A researcher should check on the factor structure of the MC-SDS when using it in their research, especially with different cultural populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信