侵权法——石棉诉讼中的专家证言——南卡罗莱纳地区法院认为，即使法律结论在科学上是合理的，每次暴露理论也不足以证明具体的因果关系。——Haskins诉3m Co.， no . 2:15-cv-02086, 3:15-cv-02123, 2017 WL 3118017 (dsc, 2017年7月21日)。

IF 3.5 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

Harvard Law Review Pub Date : 2017-12-01

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

Tort Law--Expert Testimony in Asbestos Litigation--District of South Carolina Holds the Every Exposure Theory Insufficient to Demonstrate Specific Causation Even If Legal Conclusions are Scientifically Sound.--Haskins v. 3m Co., Nos. 2:15-cv-02086, 3:15-cv-02123, 2017 WL 3118017 (D.S.C. July 21, 2017).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Harvard Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

11.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2,500 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions and, together with a professional business staff of three, carry out day-to-day operations. Aside from serving as an important academic forum for legal scholarship, the Review has two other goals. First, the journal is designed to be an effective research tool for practicing lawyers and students of the law. Second, it provides opportunities for Review members to develop their own editing and writing skills. Accordingly, each issue contains pieces by student editors as well as outside authors. The Review publishes articles by professors, judges, and practitioners and solicits reviews of important recent books from recognized experts. All articles — even those by the most respected authorities — are subjected to a rigorous editorial process designed to sharpen and strengthen substance and tone.