{"title":"美国间歇性使用亲水包覆和非包覆导尿管相关的医疗费用","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This health economic evaluation simulated a cohort to compare hydrophilic-coated\nto non-coated catheters for intermittent catheterization. By using a Markov\nmodel, lifetime costs and catheter-related complications were investigated.\nResults determined that the use of hydrophilic-coated catheters save money and\nreduce treatment-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23510,"journal":{"name":"Urologic nursing","volume":"36 5","pages":"233-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare Costs Associated with Hydrophilic-Coated And Non-Coated Urinary Catheters for Intermittent Use In the United States.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This health economic evaluation simulated a cohort to compare hydrophilic-coated\\nto non-coated catheters for intermittent catheterization. By using a Markov\\nmodel, lifetime costs and catheter-related complications were investigated.\\nResults determined that the use of hydrophilic-coated catheters save money and\\nreduce treatment-related complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic nursing\",\"volume\":\"36 5\",\"pages\":\"233-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Healthcare Costs Associated with Hydrophilic-Coated And Non-Coated Urinary Catheters for Intermittent Use In the United States.
This health economic evaluation simulated a cohort to compare hydrophilic-coated
to non-coated catheters for intermittent catheterization. By using a Markov
model, lifetime costs and catheter-related complications were investigated.
Results determined that the use of hydrophilic-coated catheters save money and
reduce treatment-related complications.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
