一种新型肌肉骨骼准备度筛选工具的实时互译可靠性。

U.S. Army Medical Department journal Pub Date : 2017-10-01
Mark D Thelen, Shane L Koppenhaver, Shanee E Allen, Michael U Bolduc, Riley K Quan, Anne E Sidwell
{"title":"一种新型肌肉骨骼准备度筛选工具的实时互译可靠性。","authors":"Mark D Thelen,&nbsp;Shane L Koppenhaver,&nbsp;Shanee E Allen,&nbsp;Michael U Bolduc,&nbsp;Riley K Quan,&nbsp;Anne E Sidwell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Military service members receive regular screenings for a variety of health conditions, but a field-expedient and military-specific screening tool that identifies an individual's risk for injury has not yet been identified. The purpose of this study is to describe the conduct of a novel musculoskeletal readiness screening tool (MRST) and evaluate the real-time interrater reliability of the MRST when scored by raters with differing levels of medical experience.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>This study included a convenience sample of 40 active duty military participants (30 male, 10 female, mean age 29.3±6.9 years) without any current musculoskeletal injury or pain at the time of enrollment. The MRST consisted of 5 physical performance tests and one self-report question as follows: (1) weight-bearing lunge (WBL), (2) overhead squat, (3) closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test (CKCUEST), (4) eyes closed forward step down, (5) repeated tuck jump, and (6) individual perceived level of risk for MSK injury. Three raters (a board certified physical therapist with 15 years of experience, a physical therapy student with less than one year didactic training, and a physical therapy technician with approximately 10 years of experience) independently scored each event as 0, 1, or 2 based on the quality of the participant's performance. This scoring system allows for a cumulative score ranging from 0 to 12, with lower scores thought to indicate higher risk for future injury. Descriptive, reliability, and chance-corrected agreement statistics were calculated using IBM SPSS. This study was approved by the Brooke Army Medical Center Institutional Review Board at Fort Sam Houston, Texas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean composite MRST score for all graders was 7.79±1.41. Among all 3 raters the overall reliability was moderate (ICC (2,1)=0.75 (0.62, 0.85)). Chance-corrected agreement values for the individual events ranged from slight to almost perfect as follows: WBL (κ=0.33-0.44), overhead squat (κ=0.57-0.65), CKCUEST (κ=0.89-1.0), eyes-closed forward step down (κ=0.10-0.42), repeated tuck jump (κ=0.39-0.61), individual perceived level of risk for MSK injury (κ=1.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MRST showed moderate interrater reliability for the overall composite score with varied levels of agreement for individual events scores. Future research should investigate test-retest reliability and interrater reliability among medical personnel from different disciplines.</p>","PeriodicalId":88789,"journal":{"name":"U.S. Army Medical Department journal","volume":" 3-17","pages":"43-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real time interrater reliability of a novel musculoskeletal readiness screening tool.\",\"authors\":\"Mark D Thelen,&nbsp;Shane L Koppenhaver,&nbsp;Shanee E Allen,&nbsp;Michael U Bolduc,&nbsp;Riley K Quan,&nbsp;Anne E Sidwell\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Military service members receive regular screenings for a variety of health conditions, but a field-expedient and military-specific screening tool that identifies an individual's risk for injury has not yet been identified. The purpose of this study is to describe the conduct of a novel musculoskeletal readiness screening tool (MRST) and evaluate the real-time interrater reliability of the MRST when scored by raters with differing levels of medical experience.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>This study included a convenience sample of 40 active duty military participants (30 male, 10 female, mean age 29.3±6.9 years) without any current musculoskeletal injury or pain at the time of enrollment. The MRST consisted of 5 physical performance tests and one self-report question as follows: (1) weight-bearing lunge (WBL), (2) overhead squat, (3) closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test (CKCUEST), (4) eyes closed forward step down, (5) repeated tuck jump, and (6) individual perceived level of risk for MSK injury. Three raters (a board certified physical therapist with 15 years of experience, a physical therapy student with less than one year didactic training, and a physical therapy technician with approximately 10 years of experience) independently scored each event as 0, 1, or 2 based on the quality of the participant's performance. This scoring system allows for a cumulative score ranging from 0 to 12, with lower scores thought to indicate higher risk for future injury. Descriptive, reliability, and chance-corrected agreement statistics were calculated using IBM SPSS. This study was approved by the Brooke Army Medical Center Institutional Review Board at Fort Sam Houston, Texas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean composite MRST score for all graders was 7.79±1.41. Among all 3 raters the overall reliability was moderate (ICC (2,1)=0.75 (0.62, 0.85)). Chance-corrected agreement values for the individual events ranged from slight to almost perfect as follows: WBL (κ=0.33-0.44), overhead squat (κ=0.57-0.65), CKCUEST (κ=0.89-1.0), eyes-closed forward step down (κ=0.10-0.42), repeated tuck jump (κ=0.39-0.61), individual perceived level of risk for MSK injury (κ=1.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MRST showed moderate interrater reliability for the overall composite score with varied levels of agreement for individual events scores. Future research should investigate test-retest reliability and interrater reliability among medical personnel from different disciplines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"U.S. Army Medical Department journal\",\"volume\":\" 3-17\",\"pages\":\"43-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"U.S. Army Medical Department journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U.S. Army Medical Department journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

军人接受各种健康状况的定期检查,但尚未确定确定个人受伤风险的现场应急和军事特定筛查工具。本研究的目的是描述一种新的肌肉骨骼准备度筛查工具(MRST)的实施,并评估MRST在由不同医疗经验水平的评分者评分时的实时互译可靠性。材料/方法:本研究纳入40名现役军人参与者(男性30人,女性10人,平均年龄29.3±6.9岁),入组时无任何当前肌肉骨骼损伤或疼痛。MRST包括5项体能测试和1项自述题:(1)负重弓步(WBL),(2)头顶深蹲,(3)闭式动力链上肢稳定性测试(CKCUEST),(4)闭目向前下步,(5)重复塔跳,(6)个体感知MSK损伤风险水平。三名评分员(一名有15年经验的委员会认证物理治疗师,一名接受不到一年教学培训的物理治疗学生,以及一名有大约10年经验的物理治疗技术人员)根据参与者的表现质量分别给每个事件打分为0、1或2。该评分系统允许从0到12的累积分数,较低的分数被认为表明未来受伤的风险较高。使用IBM SPSS计算描述性、可靠性和机会校正协议统计量。这项研究是由布鲁克陆军医学中心机构审查委员会在萨姆休斯顿堡,德克萨斯州批准的。结果:所有评分者的MRST平均综合评分为7.79±1.41。3个评分者的总体信度均为中等(ICC(2,1)=0.75(0.62, 0.85))。个别事件的机会校正一致性值从轻微到几乎完美,如下:WBL (κ=0.33-0.44),俯身深蹲(κ=0.57-0.65), CKCUEST (κ=0.89-1.0),闭眼前降(κ=0.10-0.42),重复tuck jump (κ=0.39-0.61),个体感知MSK损伤风险水平(κ=1.0)。结论:MRST在整体综合评分中显示出中等的判读信度,而在个别事件评分中显示出不同程度的一致性。未来的研究应探讨不同学科医务人员的重测信度和解释者信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real time interrater reliability of a novel musculoskeletal readiness screening tool.

Military service members receive regular screenings for a variety of health conditions, but a field-expedient and military-specific screening tool that identifies an individual's risk for injury has not yet been identified. The purpose of this study is to describe the conduct of a novel musculoskeletal readiness screening tool (MRST) and evaluate the real-time interrater reliability of the MRST when scored by raters with differing levels of medical experience.

Materials/methods: This study included a convenience sample of 40 active duty military participants (30 male, 10 female, mean age 29.3±6.9 years) without any current musculoskeletal injury or pain at the time of enrollment. The MRST consisted of 5 physical performance tests and one self-report question as follows: (1) weight-bearing lunge (WBL), (2) overhead squat, (3) closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test (CKCUEST), (4) eyes closed forward step down, (5) repeated tuck jump, and (6) individual perceived level of risk for MSK injury. Three raters (a board certified physical therapist with 15 years of experience, a physical therapy student with less than one year didactic training, and a physical therapy technician with approximately 10 years of experience) independently scored each event as 0, 1, or 2 based on the quality of the participant's performance. This scoring system allows for a cumulative score ranging from 0 to 12, with lower scores thought to indicate higher risk for future injury. Descriptive, reliability, and chance-corrected agreement statistics were calculated using IBM SPSS. This study was approved by the Brooke Army Medical Center Institutional Review Board at Fort Sam Houston, Texas.

Results: The mean composite MRST score for all graders was 7.79±1.41. Among all 3 raters the overall reliability was moderate (ICC (2,1)=0.75 (0.62, 0.85)). Chance-corrected agreement values for the individual events ranged from slight to almost perfect as follows: WBL (κ=0.33-0.44), overhead squat (κ=0.57-0.65), CKCUEST (κ=0.89-1.0), eyes-closed forward step down (κ=0.10-0.42), repeated tuck jump (κ=0.39-0.61), individual perceived level of risk for MSK injury (κ=1.0).

Conclusions: The MRST showed moderate interrater reliability for the overall composite score with varied levels of agreement for individual events scores. Future research should investigate test-retest reliability and interrater reliability among medical personnel from different disciplines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信