土耳其胆囊上皮改变/病变和肿瘤的回顾性评估以及现有抽样方法的回顾:一项多中心研究。

Güldal Esendağlı, F Göknur Akarca, Serdar Balcı, Asuman Argon, Selma Şengiz Erhan, Nesrin Turhan, Neslihan İnce Zengin, Sevinç Hallaç Keser, Betül Çelik, Tangül Bulut, Samir Abdullazade, Esra Erden, Berna Savaş, Temmuz Bostan, Özgül Sağol, Anıl Aysal Ağalar, Nuray Kepil, Yıldırım Karslıoğlu, Armağan Günal, Fatma Markoç, Burcu Saka, Gonca Özgün, Şükrü Oğuz Özdamar, Burak Bahadır, Esin Kaymaz, Emre Işık, Semin Ayhan, Deniz Tunçel, Banu Özgüven Yılmaz, Sevinç Çelik, Tuba Karabacak, İpek Erbarut Seven, Çiğdem Ataizi Çelikel, Zuhal Gücin, Özgür Ekinci, Gülen Akyol
{"title":"土耳其胆囊上皮改变/病变和肿瘤的回顾性评估以及现有抽样方法的回顾:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Güldal Esendağlı,&nbsp;F Göknur Akarca,&nbsp;Serdar Balcı,&nbsp;Asuman Argon,&nbsp;Selma Şengiz Erhan,&nbsp;Nesrin Turhan,&nbsp;Neslihan İnce Zengin,&nbsp;Sevinç Hallaç Keser,&nbsp;Betül Çelik,&nbsp;Tangül Bulut,&nbsp;Samir Abdullazade,&nbsp;Esra Erden,&nbsp;Berna Savaş,&nbsp;Temmuz Bostan,&nbsp;Özgül Sağol,&nbsp;Anıl Aysal Ağalar,&nbsp;Nuray Kepil,&nbsp;Yıldırım Karslıoğlu,&nbsp;Armağan Günal,&nbsp;Fatma Markoç,&nbsp;Burcu Saka,&nbsp;Gonca Özgün,&nbsp;Şükrü Oğuz Özdamar,&nbsp;Burak Bahadır,&nbsp;Esin Kaymaz,&nbsp;Emre Işık,&nbsp;Semin Ayhan,&nbsp;Deniz Tunçel,&nbsp;Banu Özgüven Yılmaz,&nbsp;Sevinç Çelik,&nbsp;Tuba Karabacak,&nbsp;İpek Erbarut Seven,&nbsp;Çiğdem Ataizi Çelikel,&nbsp;Zuhal Gücin,&nbsp;Özgür Ekinci,&nbsp;Gülen Akyol","doi":"10.5146/tjpath.2017.01404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As there is continuing disagreement among the observers on the differential diagnosis between the epithelial changes/lesions and neoplasms of the gallbladder, this multicentre study was planned in order to assess the rate of the epithelial gallbladder lesions in Turkey and to propose microscopy and macroscopy protocols.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>With the participation of 22 institutions around Turkey that were included in the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Study Group, 89,324 cholecystectomy specimens sampled from 2003 to 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. The numbers of adenocarcinomas, dysplasias, intracholecystic neoplasms/adenomas, intestinal metaplasias and reactive atypia were identified with the review of pathology reports and the regional and countrywide incidence rates were presented in percentages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Epithelial changes/lesions were reported in 6% of cholecystectomy materials. Of these epithelial lesions, 7% were reported as adenocarcinoma, 0.9% as high-grade dysplasia, 4% as low-grade dysplasia, 7.8% as reactive/regenerative atypia, 1.7% as neoplastic polyp, and 15.6% as intestinal metaplasia. The remaining lesions (63%) primarily included non-neoplastic polypoids/hyperplastic lesions and antral/pyloric metaplasia. There were also differences between pathology laboratories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The major causes of the difference in reporting these epithelial changes/lesions and neoplasms include the differences related to the institute's oncological surgery frequency, sampling protocols, geographical dissimilarities, and differences in the diagnoses/interpretations of the pathologists. It seems that the diagnosis may change if new sections are taken from the specimen when any epithelial abnormality is seen during microscopic examination of the cholecystectomy materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":155409,"journal":{"name":"Turk patoloji dergisi","volume":" ","pages":"41-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5146/tjpath.2017.01404","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Retrospective Evaluation of the Epithelial Changes/Lesions and Neoplasms of the Gallbladder in Turkey and a Review of the Existing Sampling Methods: A Multicentre Study.\",\"authors\":\"Güldal Esendağlı,&nbsp;F Göknur Akarca,&nbsp;Serdar Balcı,&nbsp;Asuman Argon,&nbsp;Selma Şengiz Erhan,&nbsp;Nesrin Turhan,&nbsp;Neslihan İnce Zengin,&nbsp;Sevinç Hallaç Keser,&nbsp;Betül Çelik,&nbsp;Tangül Bulut,&nbsp;Samir Abdullazade,&nbsp;Esra Erden,&nbsp;Berna Savaş,&nbsp;Temmuz Bostan,&nbsp;Özgül Sağol,&nbsp;Anıl Aysal Ağalar,&nbsp;Nuray Kepil,&nbsp;Yıldırım Karslıoğlu,&nbsp;Armağan Günal,&nbsp;Fatma Markoç,&nbsp;Burcu Saka,&nbsp;Gonca Özgün,&nbsp;Şükrü Oğuz Özdamar,&nbsp;Burak Bahadır,&nbsp;Esin Kaymaz,&nbsp;Emre Işık,&nbsp;Semin Ayhan,&nbsp;Deniz Tunçel,&nbsp;Banu Özgüven Yılmaz,&nbsp;Sevinç Çelik,&nbsp;Tuba Karabacak,&nbsp;İpek Erbarut Seven,&nbsp;Çiğdem Ataizi Çelikel,&nbsp;Zuhal Gücin,&nbsp;Özgür Ekinci,&nbsp;Gülen Akyol\",\"doi\":\"10.5146/tjpath.2017.01404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As there is continuing disagreement among the observers on the differential diagnosis between the epithelial changes/lesions and neoplasms of the gallbladder, this multicentre study was planned in order to assess the rate of the epithelial gallbladder lesions in Turkey and to propose microscopy and macroscopy protocols.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>With the participation of 22 institutions around Turkey that were included in the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Study Group, 89,324 cholecystectomy specimens sampled from 2003 to 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. The numbers of adenocarcinomas, dysplasias, intracholecystic neoplasms/adenomas, intestinal metaplasias and reactive atypia were identified with the review of pathology reports and the regional and countrywide incidence rates were presented in percentages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Epithelial changes/lesions were reported in 6% of cholecystectomy materials. Of these epithelial lesions, 7% were reported as adenocarcinoma, 0.9% as high-grade dysplasia, 4% as low-grade dysplasia, 7.8% as reactive/regenerative atypia, 1.7% as neoplastic polyp, and 15.6% as intestinal metaplasia. The remaining lesions (63%) primarily included non-neoplastic polypoids/hyperplastic lesions and antral/pyloric metaplasia. There were also differences between pathology laboratories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The major causes of the difference in reporting these epithelial changes/lesions and neoplasms include the differences related to the institute's oncological surgery frequency, sampling protocols, geographical dissimilarities, and differences in the diagnoses/interpretations of the pathologists. It seems that the diagnosis may change if new sections are taken from the specimen when any epithelial abnormality is seen during microscopic examination of the cholecystectomy materials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":155409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk patoloji dergisi\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"41-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5146/tjpath.2017.01404\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk patoloji dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2017.01404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk patoloji dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2017.01404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:由于观察者对胆囊上皮病变/病变与肿瘤的鉴别诊断一直存在分歧,因此计划进行这项多中心研究,以评估土耳其胆囊上皮病变的发生率,并提出显微镜和宏镜检查方案。材料与方法:在土耳其肝胰胆道研究组22家机构的参与下,回顾性评价2003 - 2016年收集的89324例胆囊切除术标本。通过对病理报告的回顾,确定了腺癌、发育不良、胆囊内肿瘤/腺瘤、肠化生和反应性异型的数量,并以百分比表示了地区和全国的发病率。结果:在6%的胆囊切除术材料中报告了上皮改变/病变。在这些上皮病变中,7%为腺癌,0.9%为高级别不典型增生,4%为低级别不典型增生,7.8%为反应性/再生异型增生,1.7%为肿瘤性息肉,15.6%为肠化生。其余病变(63%)主要包括非肿瘤性息肉/增生性病变和胃窦/幽门化生。病理实验室之间也存在差异。结论:这些上皮病变和肿瘤报告差异的主要原因包括与研究所肿瘤手术频率、采样方案、地理差异以及病理学家诊断/解释的差异相关的差异。如果在胆囊切除术材料的显微镜检查中发现任何上皮异常,则从标本上取新的切片可能会改变诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Retrospective Evaluation of the Epithelial Changes/Lesions and Neoplasms of the Gallbladder in Turkey and a Review of the Existing Sampling Methods: A Multicentre Study.

Objective: As there is continuing disagreement among the observers on the differential diagnosis between the epithelial changes/lesions and neoplasms of the gallbladder, this multicentre study was planned in order to assess the rate of the epithelial gallbladder lesions in Turkey and to propose microscopy and macroscopy protocols.

Material and method: With the participation of 22 institutions around Turkey that were included in the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Study Group, 89,324 cholecystectomy specimens sampled from 2003 to 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. The numbers of adenocarcinomas, dysplasias, intracholecystic neoplasms/adenomas, intestinal metaplasias and reactive atypia were identified with the review of pathology reports and the regional and countrywide incidence rates were presented in percentages.

Results: Epithelial changes/lesions were reported in 6% of cholecystectomy materials. Of these epithelial lesions, 7% were reported as adenocarcinoma, 0.9% as high-grade dysplasia, 4% as low-grade dysplasia, 7.8% as reactive/regenerative atypia, 1.7% as neoplastic polyp, and 15.6% as intestinal metaplasia. The remaining lesions (63%) primarily included non-neoplastic polypoids/hyperplastic lesions and antral/pyloric metaplasia. There were also differences between pathology laboratories.

Conclusion: The major causes of the difference in reporting these epithelial changes/lesions and neoplasms include the differences related to the institute's oncological surgery frequency, sampling protocols, geographical dissimilarities, and differences in the diagnoses/interpretations of the pathologists. It seems that the diagnosis may change if new sections are taken from the specimen when any epithelial abnormality is seen during microscopic examination of the cholecystectomy materials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信