将患者偏好纳入多种长期疾病的管理:这是临床实践指南的角色吗?

Journal of comorbidity Pub Date : 2015-11-11 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.15256/joc.2015.5.53
Charlotte E Young, Frances M Boyle, Katie S Brooker, Allyson J Mutch
{"title":"将患者偏好纳入多种长期疾病的管理:这是临床实践指南的角色吗?","authors":"Charlotte E Young, Frances M Boyle, Katie S Brooker, Allyson J Mutch","doi":"10.15256/joc.2015.5.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical practice guidelines provide an evidence-based approach to managing single chronic conditions, but their applicability to multiple conditions has been actively debated. Incorporating patient-preference recommendations and involving consumers in guideline development may enhance their applicability, but further understanding is needed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess guidelines that include recommendations for comorbid conditions to determine the extent to which they incorporate patient-preference recommendations; use consumer-engagement processes during development, and, if so, whether these processes produce more patient-preference recommendations; and meet standard quality criteria, particularly in relation to stakeholder involvement.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A review of Australian guidelines published from 2006 to 2014 that incorporated recommendations for managing comorbid conditions in primary care. Document analysis of guidelines examined the presence of patient-preference recommendations and the consumer-engagement processes used. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation instrument was used to assess guideline quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen guidelines were reviewed. Twelve included at least one core patient-preference recommendation. Ten used consumer-engagement processes, including participation in development groups (seven guidelines) and reviewing drafts (ten guidelines). More extensive consumer engagement was generally linked to greater incorporation of patient-preference recommendations. Overall quality of guidelines was mixed, particularly in relation to stakeholder involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Guidelines do incorporate some patient-preference recommendations, but more explicit acknowledgement is required. Consumer-engagement processes used during guideline development have the potential to assist in identifying patient preferences, but further research is needed. Clarification of the consumer role and investment in consumer training may strengthen these processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":92071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comorbidity","volume":"5 ","pages":"122-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15256/joc.2015.5.53","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating patient preferences in the management of multiple long-term conditions: is this a role for clinical practice guidelines?\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte E Young, Frances M Boyle, Katie S Brooker, Allyson J Mutch\",\"doi\":\"10.15256/joc.2015.5.53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical practice guidelines provide an evidence-based approach to managing single chronic conditions, but their applicability to multiple conditions has been actively debated. Incorporating patient-preference recommendations and involving consumers in guideline development may enhance their applicability, but further understanding is needed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess guidelines that include recommendations for comorbid conditions to determine the extent to which they incorporate patient-preference recommendations; use consumer-engagement processes during development, and, if so, whether these processes produce more patient-preference recommendations; and meet standard quality criteria, particularly in relation to stakeholder involvement.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A review of Australian guidelines published from 2006 to 2014 that incorporated recommendations for managing comorbid conditions in primary care. Document analysis of guidelines examined the presence of patient-preference recommendations and the consumer-engagement processes used. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation instrument was used to assess guideline quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen guidelines were reviewed. Twelve included at least one core patient-preference recommendation. Ten used consumer-engagement processes, including participation in development groups (seven guidelines) and reviewing drafts (ten guidelines). More extensive consumer engagement was generally linked to greater incorporation of patient-preference recommendations. Overall quality of guidelines was mixed, particularly in relation to stakeholder involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Guidelines do incorporate some patient-preference recommendations, but more explicit acknowledgement is required. Consumer-engagement processes used during guideline development have the potential to assist in identifying patient preferences, but further research is needed. Clarification of the consumer role and investment in consumer training may strengthen these processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"122-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15256/joc.2015.5.53\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2015.5.53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2015.5.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景:临床实践指南提供了一种以证据为基础的方法来管理单一慢性疾病,但它们对多种疾病的适用性一直存在积极的争论。纳入患者偏好建议并让消费者参与指南制定可能会增强其适用性,但需要进一步了解。目的:评估包括合并症建议的指南,以确定它们在多大程度上纳入了患者偏好建议;在开发过程中使用消费者参与流程,如果是,这些流程是否会产生更多患者偏好的建议;并符合标准的质量标准,特别是在利益相关者参与方面。设计:对澳大利亚2006年至2014年发布的指南进行回顾,其中包括对初级保健中合并症管理的建议。对指南的文件分析检查了患者偏好建议和所使用的消费者参与过程的存在。采用研究指南评价量表对指南质量进行评价。结果:回顾了13项指南。其中12项包括至少一项核心患者偏好建议。其中10项采用了消费者参与流程,包括参与开发小组(7项指导方针)和审查草案(10项指导方针)。更广泛的消费者参与通常与更多地纳入患者偏好建议有关。指导方针的总体质量参差不齐,特别是在利益相关者参与方面。结论:指南确实包含了一些患者偏好的建议,但需要更明确的承认。指南制定过程中使用的消费者参与过程有可能有助于确定患者的偏好,但需要进一步的研究。澄清消费者的作用和对消费者培训的投资可以加强这些过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Incorporating patient preferences in the management of multiple long-term conditions: is this a role for clinical practice guidelines?

Incorporating patient preferences in the management of multiple long-term conditions: is this a role for clinical practice guidelines?

Background: Clinical practice guidelines provide an evidence-based approach to managing single chronic conditions, but their applicability to multiple conditions has been actively debated. Incorporating patient-preference recommendations and involving consumers in guideline development may enhance their applicability, but further understanding is needed.

Objectives: To assess guidelines that include recommendations for comorbid conditions to determine the extent to which they incorporate patient-preference recommendations; use consumer-engagement processes during development, and, if so, whether these processes produce more patient-preference recommendations; and meet standard quality criteria, particularly in relation to stakeholder involvement.

Design: A review of Australian guidelines published from 2006 to 2014 that incorporated recommendations for managing comorbid conditions in primary care. Document analysis of guidelines examined the presence of patient-preference recommendations and the consumer-engagement processes used. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation instrument was used to assess guideline quality.

Results: Thirteen guidelines were reviewed. Twelve included at least one core patient-preference recommendation. Ten used consumer-engagement processes, including participation in development groups (seven guidelines) and reviewing drafts (ten guidelines). More extensive consumer engagement was generally linked to greater incorporation of patient-preference recommendations. Overall quality of guidelines was mixed, particularly in relation to stakeholder involvement.

Conclusions: Guidelines do incorporate some patient-preference recommendations, but more explicit acknowledgement is required. Consumer-engagement processes used during guideline development have the potential to assist in identifying patient preferences, but further research is needed. Clarification of the consumer role and investment in consumer training may strengthen these processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信