多病的护理协调:一项范围研究。

Journal of comorbidity Pub Date : 2015-04-16 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.15256/joc.2015.5.39
Anne Doessing, Viola Burau
{"title":"多病的护理协调:一项范围研究。","authors":"Anne Doessing,&nbsp;Viola Burau","doi":"10.15256/joc.2015.5.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A key challenge in healthcare systems worldwide is the large number of patients who suffer from multimorbidity; despite this, most systems are organized within a single-disease framework.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study addresses two issues: the characteristics and preconditions of care coordination for patients with multimorbidity; and the factors that promote or inhibit care coordination at the levels of provider organizations and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The analysis is based on a scoping study, which combines a systematic literature search with a qualitative thematic analysis. The search was conducted in November 2013 and included the PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases, as well as the Cochrane Library, websites of relevant organizations and a hand-search of reference lists. The analysis included studies with a wide range of designs, from industrialized countries, in English, German and the Scandinavian languages, which focused on both multimorbidity/comorbidity and coordination of integrated care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 47 of the 226 identified studies. The central theme emerging was complexity. This related to both specific medical conditions of patients with multimorbidity (case complexity) and the organization of care delivery at the levels of provider organizations and healthcare professionals (care complexity).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In terms of how to approach care coordination, one approach is to reduce complexity and the other is to embrace complexity. Either way, future research must take a more explicit stance on complexity and also gain a better understanding of the role of professionals as a prerequisite for the development of new care coordination interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":92071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comorbidity","volume":"5 ","pages":"15-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15256/joc.2015.5.39","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care coordination of multimorbidity: a scoping study.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Doessing,&nbsp;Viola Burau\",\"doi\":\"10.15256/joc.2015.5.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A key challenge in healthcare systems worldwide is the large number of patients who suffer from multimorbidity; despite this, most systems are organized within a single-disease framework.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study addresses two issues: the characteristics and preconditions of care coordination for patients with multimorbidity; and the factors that promote or inhibit care coordination at the levels of provider organizations and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The analysis is based on a scoping study, which combines a systematic literature search with a qualitative thematic analysis. The search was conducted in November 2013 and included the PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases, as well as the Cochrane Library, websites of relevant organizations and a hand-search of reference lists. The analysis included studies with a wide range of designs, from industrialized countries, in English, German and the Scandinavian languages, which focused on both multimorbidity/comorbidity and coordination of integrated care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 47 of the 226 identified studies. The central theme emerging was complexity. This related to both specific medical conditions of patients with multimorbidity (case complexity) and the organization of care delivery at the levels of provider organizations and healthcare professionals (care complexity).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In terms of how to approach care coordination, one approach is to reduce complexity and the other is to embrace complexity. Either way, future research must take a more explicit stance on complexity and also gain a better understanding of the role of professionals as a prerequisite for the development of new care coordination interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"15-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15256/joc.2015.5.39\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2015.5.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2015.5.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

摘要

背景:全球卫生保健系统面临的一个关键挑战是患有多种疾病的大量患者;尽管如此,大多数系统都是在单一疾病框架内组织起来的。目的:探讨多病患者护理协调的特点和前提条件;以及在提供者组织和医疗保健专业人员层面促进或抑制护理协调的因素。设计:分析是基于范围研究,它结合了系统的文献检索和定性的专题分析。检索于2013年11月进行,包括PubMed、CINAHL和Web of Science数据库,以及Cochrane图书馆、相关组织的网站和手工检索的参考文献列表。分析包括来自工业化国家的设计广泛的研究,用英语、德语和斯堪的纳维亚语进行,重点是多病/共病和综合护理的协调。结果:该分析包括226项确定研究中的47项。出现的中心主题是复杂性。这既涉及多种疾病患者的具体医疗条件(病例复杂性),也涉及在提供者组织和医疗保健专业人员层面上提供护理的组织(护理复杂性)。结论:在护理协调的处理上,一种是降低复杂性,另一种是拥抱复杂性。无论如何,未来的研究必须对复杂性采取更明确的立场,并更好地理解专业人员的作用,这是开发新的护理协调干预措施的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Care coordination of multimorbidity: a scoping study.

Care coordination of multimorbidity: a scoping study.

Background: A key challenge in healthcare systems worldwide is the large number of patients who suffer from multimorbidity; despite this, most systems are organized within a single-disease framework.

Objective: The present study addresses two issues: the characteristics and preconditions of care coordination for patients with multimorbidity; and the factors that promote or inhibit care coordination at the levels of provider organizations and healthcare professionals.

Design: The analysis is based on a scoping study, which combines a systematic literature search with a qualitative thematic analysis. The search was conducted in November 2013 and included the PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases, as well as the Cochrane Library, websites of relevant organizations and a hand-search of reference lists. The analysis included studies with a wide range of designs, from industrialized countries, in English, German and the Scandinavian languages, which focused on both multimorbidity/comorbidity and coordination of integrated care.

Results: The analysis included 47 of the 226 identified studies. The central theme emerging was complexity. This related to both specific medical conditions of patients with multimorbidity (case complexity) and the organization of care delivery at the levels of provider organizations and healthcare professionals (care complexity).

Conclusions: In terms of how to approach care coordination, one approach is to reduce complexity and the other is to embrace complexity. Either way, future research must take a more explicit stance on complexity and also gain a better understanding of the role of professionals as a prerequisite for the development of new care coordination interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信