用更少的唾液生物标志物进行更准确的口腔癌筛查。

Biomarkers in cancer Pub Date : 2017-10-17 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179299X17732007
James Michael Menke, Md Shahidul Ahsan, Suan Phaik Khoo
{"title":"用更少的唾液生物标志物进行更准确的口腔癌筛查。","authors":"James Michael Menke, Md Shahidul Ahsan, Suan Phaik Khoo","doi":"10.1177/1179299X17732007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Signal detection and Bayesian inferential tools were applied to salivary biomarkers to improve screening accuracy and efficiency in detecting oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Potential cancer biomarkers are identified by significant differences in assay concentrations, receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve (AUCs), sensitivity, and specificity. However, the end goal is to report to individual patients their risk of having disease given positive or negative test results. Likelihood ratios (LRs) and Bayes factors (BFs) estimate evidential support and compile biomarker information to optimize screening accuracy. In total, 26 of 77 biomarkers were mentioned as having been tested at least twice in 137 studies and published in 16 summary papers through 2014. Studies represented 10 212 OSCC and 25 645 healthy patients. The measure of biomarker and panel information value was number of biomarkers needed to approximate 100% positive predictive value (PPV). As few as 5 biomarkers could achieve nearly 100% PPV for a disease prevalence of 0.2% when biomarkers were ordered from highest to lowest LR. When sequentially interpreting biomarker tests, high specificity was more important than test sensitivity in achieving rapid convergence toward a high PPV. Biomarkers ranked from highest to lowest LR were more informative and easier to interpret than AUC or Youden index. The proposed method should be applied to more recently published biomarker data to test its screening value.</p>","PeriodicalId":72377,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers in cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2c/94/10.1177_1179299X17732007.PMC5648090.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More Accurate Oral Cancer Screening with Fewer Salivary Biomarkers.\",\"authors\":\"James Michael Menke, Md Shahidul Ahsan, Suan Phaik Khoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179299X17732007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Signal detection and Bayesian inferential tools were applied to salivary biomarkers to improve screening accuracy and efficiency in detecting oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Potential cancer biomarkers are identified by significant differences in assay concentrations, receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve (AUCs), sensitivity, and specificity. However, the end goal is to report to individual patients their risk of having disease given positive or negative test results. Likelihood ratios (LRs) and Bayes factors (BFs) estimate evidential support and compile biomarker information to optimize screening accuracy. In total, 26 of 77 biomarkers were mentioned as having been tested at least twice in 137 studies and published in 16 summary papers through 2014. Studies represented 10 212 OSCC and 25 645 healthy patients. The measure of biomarker and panel information value was number of biomarkers needed to approximate 100% positive predictive value (PPV). As few as 5 biomarkers could achieve nearly 100% PPV for a disease prevalence of 0.2% when biomarkers were ordered from highest to lowest LR. When sequentially interpreting biomarker tests, high specificity was more important than test sensitivity in achieving rapid convergence toward a high PPV. Biomarkers ranked from highest to lowest LR were more informative and easier to interpret than AUC or Youden index. The proposed method should be applied to more recently published biomarker data to test its screening value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomarkers in cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2c/94/10.1177_1179299X17732007.PMC5648090.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomarkers in cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179299X17732007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers in cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179299X17732007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将信号检测和贝叶斯推断工具应用于唾液生物标记物,以提高检测口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)的筛查准确性和效率。潜在的癌症生物标记物是通过检测浓度、曲线下接收者操作特征区域(AUC)、灵敏度和特异性的显著差异来确定的。然而,最终目标是向患者报告在检测结果呈阳性或阴性的情况下他们患病的风险。似然比(LRs)和贝叶斯因子(BFs)可估算证据支持并汇编生物标记物信息,以优化筛查准确性。截至 2014 年,在 137 项研究中,77 种生物标志物中共有 26 种至少经过两次检测,并发表在 16 篇摘要论文中。这些研究代表了 10 212 名 OSCC 患者和 25 645 名健康患者。衡量生物标志物和面板信息价值的标准是接近100%阳性预测值(PPV)所需的生物标志物数量。当生物标记物的LR值从高到低排列时,0.2%的疾病患病率只需5个生物标记物就能达到近100%的PPV值。在依次解释生物标志物检测时,高特异性比检测灵敏度更重要,它能使检测结果迅速趋于高PPV。与AUC或Youden指数相比,LR从高到低排序的生物标记物信息量更大,也更容易解释。建议将该方法应用于最近发表的生物标志物数据,以检验其筛查价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

More Accurate Oral Cancer Screening with Fewer Salivary Biomarkers.

More Accurate Oral Cancer Screening with Fewer Salivary Biomarkers.

More Accurate Oral Cancer Screening with Fewer Salivary Biomarkers.

More Accurate Oral Cancer Screening with Fewer Salivary Biomarkers.

Signal detection and Bayesian inferential tools were applied to salivary biomarkers to improve screening accuracy and efficiency in detecting oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Potential cancer biomarkers are identified by significant differences in assay concentrations, receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve (AUCs), sensitivity, and specificity. However, the end goal is to report to individual patients their risk of having disease given positive or negative test results. Likelihood ratios (LRs) and Bayes factors (BFs) estimate evidential support and compile biomarker information to optimize screening accuracy. In total, 26 of 77 biomarkers were mentioned as having been tested at least twice in 137 studies and published in 16 summary papers through 2014. Studies represented 10 212 OSCC and 25 645 healthy patients. The measure of biomarker and panel information value was number of biomarkers needed to approximate 100% positive predictive value (PPV). As few as 5 biomarkers could achieve nearly 100% PPV for a disease prevalence of 0.2% when biomarkers were ordered from highest to lowest LR. When sequentially interpreting biomarker tests, high specificity was more important than test sensitivity in achieving rapid convergence toward a high PPV. Biomarkers ranked from highest to lowest LR were more informative and easier to interpret than AUC or Youden index. The proposed method should be applied to more recently published biomarker data to test its screening value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信