子宫切除术途径作为实践变化的全球引擎:对护理价值的影响。

Central Asian Journal of Global Health Pub Date : 2017-09-25 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.5195/cajgh.2017.299
Amin Sanei-Moghaddam, Sharon Goughnour, Robert Edwards, John Comerci, Joseph Kelley, Nicole Donnellan, Faina Linkov, Suketu Mansuria
{"title":"子宫切除术途径作为实践变化的全球引擎:对护理价值的影响。","authors":"Amin Sanei-Moghaddam,&nbsp;Sharon Goughnour,&nbsp;Robert Edwards,&nbsp;John Comerci,&nbsp;Joseph Kelley,&nbsp;Nicole Donnellan,&nbsp;Faina Linkov,&nbsp;Suketu Mansuria","doi":"10.5195/cajgh.2017.299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2012, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) introduced a hysterectomy clinical pathway to reduce the number of total abdominal hysterectomies performed for benign gynecological indications. This study focused on exploring physician and patient factors impacting the utilization of hysterectomy clinical pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey with 24 questions was implemented to explore physicians' attitudes and perceived barriers toward implementing the pathway. A survey consisting of 27 questions was developed for patients to determine the utility of a pathway-based educational tool for making surgery decisions and to measure satisfaction with the information provided. Descriptive statistics were used to describe survey results, while thematic analysis was performed on verbal feedback submitted by respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physician respondents found the clinical pathway to be practical, beneficial to patients, and up-to-date with the latest evidence-based literature. Key barriers to the use of the pathway that were identified by physicians included perceived waste of time, inappropriateness for some of the patient groups, improper incentive structure, and excessive bureaucracy surrounding the process. Overall, patient respondents were satisfied with the tool and found it to be helpful with the decision-making process of choosing a hysterectomy route.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physicians and patients found the developed tools to be practical and beneficial. Findings of this study will help to use pathways as a unifying framework to shape future care of patients needing hysterectomy and add value to their care.</p>","PeriodicalId":42537,"journal":{"name":"Central Asian Journal of Global Health","volume":"6 1","pages":"299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5675396/pdf/cajgh-06-299.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hysterectomy Pathway as the Global Engine of Practice Change: Implications for Value in Care.\",\"authors\":\"Amin Sanei-Moghaddam,&nbsp;Sharon Goughnour,&nbsp;Robert Edwards,&nbsp;John Comerci,&nbsp;Joseph Kelley,&nbsp;Nicole Donnellan,&nbsp;Faina Linkov,&nbsp;Suketu Mansuria\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/cajgh.2017.299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2012, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) introduced a hysterectomy clinical pathway to reduce the number of total abdominal hysterectomies performed for benign gynecological indications. This study focused on exploring physician and patient factors impacting the utilization of hysterectomy clinical pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey with 24 questions was implemented to explore physicians' attitudes and perceived barriers toward implementing the pathway. A survey consisting of 27 questions was developed for patients to determine the utility of a pathway-based educational tool for making surgery decisions and to measure satisfaction with the information provided. Descriptive statistics were used to describe survey results, while thematic analysis was performed on verbal feedback submitted by respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physician respondents found the clinical pathway to be practical, beneficial to patients, and up-to-date with the latest evidence-based literature. Key barriers to the use of the pathway that were identified by physicians included perceived waste of time, inappropriateness for some of the patient groups, improper incentive structure, and excessive bureaucracy surrounding the process. Overall, patient respondents were satisfied with the tool and found it to be helpful with the decision-making process of choosing a hysterectomy route.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physicians and patients found the developed tools to be practical and beneficial. Findings of this study will help to use pathways as a unifying framework to shape future care of patients needing hysterectomy and add value to their care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central Asian Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5675396/pdf/cajgh-06-299.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central Asian Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/cajgh.2017.299\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Asian Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/cajgh.2017.299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

简介:2012年,匹兹堡大学医学中心(UPMC)引入了子宫切除术临床路径,以减少因良性妇科适应症而进行的全腹子宫切除术的数量。本研究的重点是探讨影响子宫切除术临床途径的医生和患者因素。方法:通过一项包含24个问题的在线调查,探讨医生对实施该路径的态度和感知障碍。一项由27个问题组成的调查为患者开发,以确定基于路径的教育工具在做出手术决策方面的效用,并衡量对所提供信息的满意度。使用描述性统计描述调查结果,而对受访者提交的口头反馈进行专题分析。结果:受访医师认为临床路径是实用的,对患者有益,并与最新的循证文献保持同步。医生发现使用该途径的主要障碍包括浪费时间,不适合某些患者群体,不适当的激励结构以及围绕该过程的过度官僚主义。总体而言,患者受访者对该工具感到满意,并发现它有助于选择子宫切除术路线的决策过程。结论:医生和患者发现开发的工具是实用和有益的。本研究的发现将有助于使用路径作为一个统一的框架,以塑造需要子宫切除术的患者的未来护理,并为他们的护理增加价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hysterectomy Pathway as the Global Engine of Practice Change: Implications for Value in Care.

Introduction: In 2012, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) introduced a hysterectomy clinical pathway to reduce the number of total abdominal hysterectomies performed for benign gynecological indications. This study focused on exploring physician and patient factors impacting the utilization of hysterectomy clinical pathways.

Methods: An online survey with 24 questions was implemented to explore physicians' attitudes and perceived barriers toward implementing the pathway. A survey consisting of 27 questions was developed for patients to determine the utility of a pathway-based educational tool for making surgery decisions and to measure satisfaction with the information provided. Descriptive statistics were used to describe survey results, while thematic analysis was performed on verbal feedback submitted by respondents.

Results: Physician respondents found the clinical pathway to be practical, beneficial to patients, and up-to-date with the latest evidence-based literature. Key barriers to the use of the pathway that were identified by physicians included perceived waste of time, inappropriateness for some of the patient groups, improper incentive structure, and excessive bureaucracy surrounding the process. Overall, patient respondents were satisfied with the tool and found it to be helpful with the decision-making process of choosing a hysterectomy route.

Conclusions: Physicians and patients found the developed tools to be practical and beneficial. Findings of this study will help to use pathways as a unifying framework to shape future care of patients needing hysterectomy and add value to their care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Central Asian Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信