Stephen J Lockwood, Lisette M Prens, Alexa B Kimball
{"title":"银屑病生物制剂的不良反应。","authors":"Stephen J Lockwood, Lisette M Prens, Alexa B Kimball","doi":"10.1159/000478072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune disease which affects millions of people worldwide. Not only can psoriasis itself be debilitating and significantly reduce an individual's quality of life, but it is also a risk factor for other systemic disorders, such as metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and malignancy. Tremendous strides were made in the treatment of psoriasis during the mid-to-late-20th century, including the emergence of topical corticosteroids and vitamin D analogs, methotrexate, systemic retinoids, and phototherapy. However, it was not until 2004 with the advent of systemic biologic agents, which precisely target components of the immune system involved in the pathophysiological process of psoriasis, that the primary treatment benchmark increased from 50% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) to PASI 75, PASI 90, and even PASI 100, or complete resolution of cutaneous disease. Today, many patients receiving biologic therapy routinely experience greater than 75% or 90% reduction in cutaneous disease burden and a significant improvement in overall quality of life. These biologic agents are generally well-tolerated and safe but, like any medication, have associated adverse effects, some of which are predictable based on the effects of immune modulation, animal model studies, and human populations with known cytokine deficiencies. Going forward, it will be important to carefully monitor the safety profiles of these agents in both clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance registries to ensure long-term safety. It is reassuring that large safety registries are consistent in demonstrating an improved safety profile with newer and emerging biologic therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11010,"journal":{"name":"Current problems in dermatology","volume":"53 ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000478072","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse Reactions to Biologics in Psoriasis.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen J Lockwood, Lisette M Prens, Alexa B Kimball\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000478072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune disease which affects millions of people worldwide. Not only can psoriasis itself be debilitating and significantly reduce an individual's quality of life, but it is also a risk factor for other systemic disorders, such as metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and malignancy. Tremendous strides were made in the treatment of psoriasis during the mid-to-late-20th century, including the emergence of topical corticosteroids and vitamin D analogs, methotrexate, systemic retinoids, and phototherapy. However, it was not until 2004 with the advent of systemic biologic agents, which precisely target components of the immune system involved in the pathophysiological process of psoriasis, that the primary treatment benchmark increased from 50% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) to PASI 75, PASI 90, and even PASI 100, or complete resolution of cutaneous disease. Today, many patients receiving biologic therapy routinely experience greater than 75% or 90% reduction in cutaneous disease burden and a significant improvement in overall quality of life. These biologic agents are generally well-tolerated and safe but, like any medication, have associated adverse effects, some of which are predictable based on the effects of immune modulation, animal model studies, and human populations with known cytokine deficiencies. Going forward, it will be important to carefully monitor the safety profiles of these agents in both clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance registries to ensure long-term safety. It is reassuring that large safety registries are consistent in demonstrating an improved safety profile with newer and emerging biologic therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current problems in dermatology\",\"volume\":\"53 \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000478072\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current problems in dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000478072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/11/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current problems in dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000478072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
摘要
牛皮癣是一种慢性自身免疫性疾病,影响着全世界数百万人。牛皮癣本身不仅会使人衰弱,显著降低个人的生活质量,而且也是其他全身性疾病的危险因素,如代谢综合征、心血管疾病和恶性肿瘤。20世纪中后期,银屑病的治疗取得了巨大的进步,包括局部皮质类固醇和维生素D类似物、甲氨蝶呤、全身类维生素a和光疗的出现。然而,直到2004年,随着系统性生物制剂的出现,精确靶向参与银屑病病理生理过程的免疫系统成分,最初的治疗基准从50%的改善银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI 50)增加到PASI 75, PASI 90,甚至PASI 100,或完全解决皮肤病。今天,许多接受生物治疗的患者常规经历了75%或90%以上的皮肤病负担减轻和总体生活质量的显著改善。这些生物制剂通常具有良好的耐受性和安全性,但与任何药物一样,也有相关的副作用,其中一些副作用是可以根据免疫调节的影响、动物模型研究和已知细胞因子缺乏的人群来预测的。展望未来,重要的是在临床试验和上市后监测登记中仔细监测这些药物的安全性,以确保长期安全性。令人放心的是,大型安全登记一致地证明了更新和新兴生物疗法的安全性。
Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune disease which affects millions of people worldwide. Not only can psoriasis itself be debilitating and significantly reduce an individual's quality of life, but it is also a risk factor for other systemic disorders, such as metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and malignancy. Tremendous strides were made in the treatment of psoriasis during the mid-to-late-20th century, including the emergence of topical corticosteroids and vitamin D analogs, methotrexate, systemic retinoids, and phototherapy. However, it was not until 2004 with the advent of systemic biologic agents, which precisely target components of the immune system involved in the pathophysiological process of psoriasis, that the primary treatment benchmark increased from 50% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) to PASI 75, PASI 90, and even PASI 100, or complete resolution of cutaneous disease. Today, many patients receiving biologic therapy routinely experience greater than 75% or 90% reduction in cutaneous disease burden and a significant improvement in overall quality of life. These biologic agents are generally well-tolerated and safe but, like any medication, have associated adverse effects, some of which are predictable based on the effects of immune modulation, animal model studies, and human populations with known cytokine deficiencies. Going forward, it will be important to carefully monitor the safety profiles of these agents in both clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance registries to ensure long-term safety. It is reassuring that large safety registries are consistent in demonstrating an improved safety profile with newer and emerging biologic therapies.