显微镜辅助冷钢扁桃体切除术能降低术后出血的风险吗?前瞻性队列研究的结果。

International Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-08-08 DOI:10.1155/2017/8430907
Thomas Wilhelm, Jan Wittlinger, Robert Georgiew, Christian Güldner, Stephan Hoch, Afshin Teymoortash, Thomas Günzel, Petar Stankovic
{"title":"显微镜辅助冷钢扁桃体切除术能降低术后出血的风险吗?前瞻性队列研究的结果。","authors":"Thomas Wilhelm,&nbsp;Jan Wittlinger,&nbsp;Robert Georgiew,&nbsp;Christian Güldner,&nbsp;Stephan Hoch,&nbsp;Afshin Teymoortash,&nbsp;Thomas Günzel,&nbsp;Petar Stankovic","doi":"10.1155/2017/8430907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posttonsillectomy hemorrhage (PTH) is the most feared complication. Dissection near the tonsillar capsule under microscopic view (TE<sub>mic</sub>) could be assumed to decrease PTH compared to traditional tonsillectomy (TE<sub>trad</sub>).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, patients were evaluated with respect to the need for surgical control (R/N: return/no return to theater (RTT): the day of surgery [0] or thereafter [1]). The findings at resection site and pain were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>869 patients were included (183 TE<sub>mic</sub>; 686 TE<sub>trad</sub>). PTH requiring RTT was not seen in the TE<sub>mic</sub> group on the day of surgery (R0) while PTH requiring RTT subsequently (R1) was seen in 1.1% of the cases. In the TE<sub>mic</sub> group, hemorrhages without a need for surgical control were observed in 0.6% (N0) and 3.4% (N1), respectively. The corresponding rates for TE<sub>trad</sub> were as follows: R0, 0.3%; R1, 1.7%; N0, 0.6%; and N1, 3.6% (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Postoperative edema and local infection at resection site were proven to be predictive of PTH (<i>p</i> = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microscope assistance in tonsillectomy did not statistically have an influence on the PTH even though there was a trend towards lower PTH rate in the TE<sub>mic</sub> group. Benefit for TE<sub>mic</sub> was observed in high-volume and long experienced surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":32361,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"2017 ","pages":"8430907"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/8430907","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Microscope Assistance in Cold Steel Tonsillectomy Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Hemorrhage? Results of a Prospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Wilhelm,&nbsp;Jan Wittlinger,&nbsp;Robert Georgiew,&nbsp;Christian Güldner,&nbsp;Stephan Hoch,&nbsp;Afshin Teymoortash,&nbsp;Thomas Günzel,&nbsp;Petar Stankovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2017/8430907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posttonsillectomy hemorrhage (PTH) is the most feared complication. Dissection near the tonsillar capsule under microscopic view (TE<sub>mic</sub>) could be assumed to decrease PTH compared to traditional tonsillectomy (TE<sub>trad</sub>).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, patients were evaluated with respect to the need for surgical control (R/N: return/no return to theater (RTT): the day of surgery [0] or thereafter [1]). The findings at resection site and pain were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>869 patients were included (183 TE<sub>mic</sub>; 686 TE<sub>trad</sub>). PTH requiring RTT was not seen in the TE<sub>mic</sub> group on the day of surgery (R0) while PTH requiring RTT subsequently (R1) was seen in 1.1% of the cases. In the TE<sub>mic</sub> group, hemorrhages without a need for surgical control were observed in 0.6% (N0) and 3.4% (N1), respectively. The corresponding rates for TE<sub>trad</sub> were as follows: R0, 0.3%; R1, 1.7%; N0, 0.6%; and N1, 3.6% (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Postoperative edema and local infection at resection site were proven to be predictive of PTH (<i>p</i> = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microscope assistance in tonsillectomy did not statistically have an influence on the PTH even though there was a trend towards lower PTH rate in the TE<sub>mic</sub> group. Benefit for TE<sub>mic</sub> was observed in high-volume and long experienced surgeons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"2017 \",\"pages\":\"8430907\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/8430907\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8430907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8430907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:扁桃体切除术后出血(PTH)是最可怕的并发症。与传统的扁桃体切除术(TEtrad)相比,显微镜下扁桃体囊附近的解剖(TEmic)可以减少甲状旁腺激素。方法:在本研究中,对患者进行手术控制需求评估(R/N:返回/不返回手术室(RTT):手术当天[0]或之后[1])。测量切除部位及疼痛情况。结果:纳入869例患者(183例TEmic;686四分体)。TEmic组在手术当天(R0)未见PTH需要RTT,而随后(R1)的病例中有1.1%出现PTH需要RTT。在TEmic组中,无需手术控制的出血发生率分别为0.6% (N0)和3.4% (N1)。四元体的相应率为:R0, 0.3%;R1, 1.7%;N0, 0.6%;N1为3.6% (p > 0.05)。术后水肿和切除部位局部感染被证明是PTH的预测指标(p = 0.007)。结论:显微镜辅助扁桃体切除术对甲状旁腺激素无统计学影响,尽管TEmic组有降低甲状旁腺激素率的趋势。在高容量和经验丰富的外科医生中观察到TEmic的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Does Microscope Assistance in Cold Steel Tonsillectomy Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Hemorrhage? Results of a Prospective Cohort Study.

Does Microscope Assistance in Cold Steel Tonsillectomy Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Hemorrhage? Results of a Prospective Cohort Study.

Does Microscope Assistance in Cold Steel Tonsillectomy Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Hemorrhage? Results of a Prospective Cohort Study.

Does Microscope Assistance in Cold Steel Tonsillectomy Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Hemorrhage? Results of a Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: Posttonsillectomy hemorrhage (PTH) is the most feared complication. Dissection near the tonsillar capsule under microscopic view (TEmic) could be assumed to decrease PTH compared to traditional tonsillectomy (TEtrad).

Methods: In this study, patients were evaluated with respect to the need for surgical control (R/N: return/no return to theater (RTT): the day of surgery [0] or thereafter [1]). The findings at resection site and pain were measured.

Results: 869 patients were included (183 TEmic; 686 TEtrad). PTH requiring RTT was not seen in the TEmic group on the day of surgery (R0) while PTH requiring RTT subsequently (R1) was seen in 1.1% of the cases. In the TEmic group, hemorrhages without a need for surgical control were observed in 0.6% (N0) and 3.4% (N1), respectively. The corresponding rates for TEtrad were as follows: R0, 0.3%; R1, 1.7%; N0, 0.6%; and N1, 3.6% (p > 0.05). Postoperative edema and local infection at resection site were proven to be predictive of PTH (p = 0.007).

Conclusion: Microscope assistance in tonsillectomy did not statistically have an influence on the PTH even though there was a trend towards lower PTH rate in the TEmic group. Benefit for TEmic was observed in high-volume and long experienced surgeons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信