空化根龋的治疗:最小干预和替代方法。

Q2 Dentistry
Monographs in Oral Science Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-10-19 DOI:10.1159/000479352
Michael F Burrow, Margaret A Stacey
{"title":"空化根龋的治疗:最小干预和替代方法。","authors":"Michael F Burrow,&nbsp;Margaret A Stacey","doi":"10.1159/000479352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prevalence of root caries among the elderly is increasing. The lesion shape can vary considerably from a broad shallow saucer-shape to a deeper defined cavity. The variety of shapes poses a series of complications when considering restorative management. This is accompanied with a paucity of clinical evidence on treatment techniques and clinical outcomes. The current philosophy centered on conservative management of root caries will most likely provide patients with the greatest chance of maintaining their teeth. When a lesion can be effectively cleaned in conjunction with a high fluoride content toothpaste and other remineralizing agents, this should be the treatment of choice. For lesions that are cavitated and cannot be effectively cleaned, the initial management should be to apply remineralizing agents for a period to \"harden\" lesion margins thus potentially reducing the prepared cavity and restoration size, as well as providing a better-defined tooth-restoration margin for finishing. Material selection is either a glass ionomer cement (conventional or resin-modified) or resin-based material. Frequently, the restoration site is easily contaminated; hence, glass ionomer cement is an ideal material. However, for saliva-deficient patients, resin composite or a combination of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive allows for a highly polished, easily cleansable restoration surface that may reduce the potential for further caries initiation. The current evidence base for the restoration of root caries is poor.</p>","PeriodicalId":35771,"journal":{"name":"Monographs in Oral Science","volume":"26 ","pages":"106-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000479352","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Cavitated Root Caries Lesions: Minimum Intervention and Alternatives.\",\"authors\":\"Michael F Burrow,&nbsp;Margaret A Stacey\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000479352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The prevalence of root caries among the elderly is increasing. The lesion shape can vary considerably from a broad shallow saucer-shape to a deeper defined cavity. The variety of shapes poses a series of complications when considering restorative management. This is accompanied with a paucity of clinical evidence on treatment techniques and clinical outcomes. The current philosophy centered on conservative management of root caries will most likely provide patients with the greatest chance of maintaining their teeth. When a lesion can be effectively cleaned in conjunction with a high fluoride content toothpaste and other remineralizing agents, this should be the treatment of choice. For lesions that are cavitated and cannot be effectively cleaned, the initial management should be to apply remineralizing agents for a period to \\\"harden\\\" lesion margins thus potentially reducing the prepared cavity and restoration size, as well as providing a better-defined tooth-restoration margin for finishing. Material selection is either a glass ionomer cement (conventional or resin-modified) or resin-based material. Frequently, the restoration site is easily contaminated; hence, glass ionomer cement is an ideal material. However, for saliva-deficient patients, resin composite or a combination of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive allows for a highly polished, easily cleansable restoration surface that may reduce the potential for further caries initiation. The current evidence base for the restoration of root caries is poor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monographs in Oral Science\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"106-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000479352\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monographs in Oral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000479352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/10/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monographs in Oral Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000479352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

牙根龋在老年人中的发病率呈上升趋势。病变的形状可以有很大的变化,从宽的浅碟状到更深的腔。在考虑修复管理时,形状的多样性带来了一系列的复杂性。与此同时,缺乏关于治疗技术和临床结果的临床证据。目前以牙根龋的保守治疗为中心的理念将最有可能为患者提供最大的机会来维持他们的牙齿。当一个病变可以有效地清洁与高氟化物含量的牙膏和其他再矿化剂,这应该是治疗的选择。对于空化且不能有效清洁的病变,最初的处理应该是使用再矿化剂一段时间来“硬化”病变边缘,从而可能减少准备的腔体和修复体的大小,并提供更好定义的牙齿修复边缘进行修整。材料选择要么是玻璃离子水泥(常规或树脂改性)或树脂基材料。修复场地往往容易受到污染;因此,玻璃离子水门合剂是一种理想的材料。然而,对于唾液缺乏的患者,树脂复合材料或树脂复合材料和树脂改性玻璃离聚体粘合剂的组合允许高度抛光,易于清洁的修复表面,这可能会减少进一步引发龋齿的可能性。目前牙根龋修复的证据基础较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of Cavitated Root Caries Lesions: Minimum Intervention and Alternatives.

The prevalence of root caries among the elderly is increasing. The lesion shape can vary considerably from a broad shallow saucer-shape to a deeper defined cavity. The variety of shapes poses a series of complications when considering restorative management. This is accompanied with a paucity of clinical evidence on treatment techniques and clinical outcomes. The current philosophy centered on conservative management of root caries will most likely provide patients with the greatest chance of maintaining their teeth. When a lesion can be effectively cleaned in conjunction with a high fluoride content toothpaste and other remineralizing agents, this should be the treatment of choice. For lesions that are cavitated and cannot be effectively cleaned, the initial management should be to apply remineralizing agents for a period to "harden" lesion margins thus potentially reducing the prepared cavity and restoration size, as well as providing a better-defined tooth-restoration margin for finishing. Material selection is either a glass ionomer cement (conventional or resin-modified) or resin-based material. Frequently, the restoration site is easily contaminated; hence, glass ionomer cement is an ideal material. However, for saliva-deficient patients, resin composite or a combination of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive allows for a highly polished, easily cleansable restoration surface that may reduce the potential for further caries initiation. The current evidence base for the restoration of root caries is poor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Monographs in Oral Science
Monographs in Oral Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: For two decades, ‘Monographs in Oral Science’ has provided a source of in-depth discussion of selected topics in the sciences related to stomatology. Senior investigators are invited to present expanded contributions in their fields of special expertise. The topics chosen are those which have generated a long-standing interest, and on which new conceptual insights or innovative biotechnology are making considerable impact. Authors are selected on the basis of having made lasting contributions to their chosen field and their willingness to share their findings with others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信