氟哌啶醇与5-HT3受体拮抗剂对术后呕吐和QTc延长的影响:随机对照试验的非劣效性荟萃分析和试验序贯分析

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2018-02-01 Epub Date: 2017-09-15 DOI:10.1002/jcph.999
Preet Mohinder Singh, Anuradha Borle, Jeetinder Kaur Makkar, Anjan Trikha, David Fish, Ashish Sinha
{"title":"氟哌啶醇与5-HT3受体拮抗剂对术后呕吐和QTc延长的影响:随机对照试验的非劣效性荟萃分析和试验序贯分析","authors":"Preet Mohinder Singh,&nbsp;Anuradha Borle,&nbsp;Jeetinder Kaur Makkar,&nbsp;Anjan Trikha,&nbsp;David Fish,&nbsp;Ashish Sinha","doi":"10.1002/jcph.999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Haloperidol is an antipsychotic with well-known antiemetic potential. It is underutilized for postoperative nausea vomiting due to reported corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation. This meta-analysis evaluates its safety and efficacy as an antiemetic in the perioperative period. Trials comparing haloperidol to 5-HT<sub>3</sub> -receptor antagonists (5-HT<sub>3</sub> -RA) for 24 postoperative vomiting incidences published up to May 2017 were searched in the medical database. Comparisons were made for antiemetic efficiency variables (vomiting incidence, rescue antiemetic need, and patients with complete response) during early (until 6 hours) and late postoperative phases. Eight randomized controlled double-blinded trials were included in the final analysis. Twenty-four-hour vomiting incidence was similar in groups (fixed effects, P = 0.52, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Trial-sequential analysis confirmed noninferiority of haloperidol over 5-HT<sub>3</sub> -RAs (α = 5%, β = 20%, δ = 10%), with \"information size\" being 859 (required > 812). Pooled results did not demonstrate superiority/inferiority of 5-HT<sub>3</sub> -RAs over haloperidol in all other antiemetic efficacy variables (early and delayed). Negligible heterogeneity was found in all the comparisons made. Pooled Mantel Haenszel odds ratio for QTc prolongation was equivalent in both groups (fixed effects, P = 0.23, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The mean dose of haloperidol used was 1.34 mg, and no trial reported extrapyramidal side effects. Trial-sequential analysis showed statistical equivalence (α = 5%, β = 20%, δ = 10%), with information size being 745 (required > 591). Publication bias was unlikely (Egger test, X-intercept = 2.07, P = 0.10). We conclude that haloperidol is equivalent to the well-established 5-HT<sub>3</sub> -RAs in preventing vomiting during the first day after surgery. The incidence of QTc prolongation with haloperidol is statistically equivalent to 5-HT<sub>3</sub> -RAs and thus should not be the factor that discourages its use for treatment/prophylaxis of postoperative nausea vomiting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15536,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"58 2","pages":"131-143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jcph.999","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Haloperidol Versus 5-HT<sub>3</sub> Receptor Antagonists for Postoperative Vomiting and QTc Prolongation: A Noninferiority Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Preet Mohinder Singh,&nbsp;Anuradha Borle,&nbsp;Jeetinder Kaur Makkar,&nbsp;Anjan Trikha,&nbsp;David Fish,&nbsp;Ashish Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcph.999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Haloperidol is an antipsychotic with well-known antiemetic potential. It is underutilized for postoperative nausea vomiting due to reported corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation. This meta-analysis evaluates its safety and efficacy as an antiemetic in the perioperative period. Trials comparing haloperidol to 5-HT<sub>3</sub> -receptor antagonists (5-HT<sub>3</sub> -RA) for 24 postoperative vomiting incidences published up to May 2017 were searched in the medical database. Comparisons were made for antiemetic efficiency variables (vomiting incidence, rescue antiemetic need, and patients with complete response) during early (until 6 hours) and late postoperative phases. Eight randomized controlled double-blinded trials were included in the final analysis. Twenty-four-hour vomiting incidence was similar in groups (fixed effects, P = 0.52, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Trial-sequential analysis confirmed noninferiority of haloperidol over 5-HT<sub>3</sub> -RAs (α = 5%, β = 20%, δ = 10%), with \\\"information size\\\" being 859 (required > 812). Pooled results did not demonstrate superiority/inferiority of 5-HT<sub>3</sub> -RAs over haloperidol in all other antiemetic efficacy variables (early and delayed). Negligible heterogeneity was found in all the comparisons made. Pooled Mantel Haenszel odds ratio for QTc prolongation was equivalent in both groups (fixed effects, P = 0.23, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The mean dose of haloperidol used was 1.34 mg, and no trial reported extrapyramidal side effects. Trial-sequential analysis showed statistical equivalence (α = 5%, β = 20%, δ = 10%), with information size being 745 (required > 591). Publication bias was unlikely (Egger test, X-intercept = 2.07, P = 0.10). We conclude that haloperidol is equivalent to the well-established 5-HT<sub>3</sub> -RAs in preventing vomiting during the first day after surgery. The incidence of QTc prolongation with haloperidol is statistically equivalent to 5-HT<sub>3</sub> -RAs and thus should not be the factor that discourages its use for treatment/prophylaxis of postoperative nausea vomiting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"58 2\",\"pages\":\"131-143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jcph.999\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.999\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/9/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

氟哌啶醇是一种抗精神病药,具有众所周知的止吐潜力。由于报告的校正QT间期(QTc)延长,它在术后恶心呕吐中的应用不足。本荟萃分析评估了其作为围手术期止吐药的安全性和有效性。在医学数据库中检索截至2017年5月发表的比较氟哌啶醇与5-HT3受体拮抗剂(5-HT3 -RA)治疗24例术后呕吐发生率的试验。比较术后早期(至6小时)和后期止吐效率变量(呕吐发生率、抢救止吐需求和患者完全缓解)。最终分析纳入8个随机对照双盲试验。各组24小时呕吐发生率相似(固定效应,P = 0.52, I2 = 0%)。试验-序贯分析证实氟哌啶醇对5-HT3 -RAs的非劣效性(α = 5%, β = 20%, δ = 10%),“信息大小”为859(要求> 812)。合并结果未显示5-HT3 -RAs在所有其他止吐疗效变量(早期和延迟)上优于氟哌啶醇。在所有的比较中均发现可忽略不计的异质性。两组QTc延长的合并Mantel - Haenszel优势比相等(固定效应,P = 0.23, I2 = 0%)。氟哌啶醇的平均剂量为1.34 mg,没有试验报告锥体外系副作用。试验-序列分析结果显示,α = 5%, β = 20%, δ = 10%,信息大小为745(要求> 591)。发表偏倚不太可能(Egger检验,x -截距= 2.07,P = 0.10)。我们得出结论,氟哌啶醇在预防术后第一天呕吐方面与已建立的5-HT3 -RAs相当。氟哌啶醇的QTc延长发生率与5-HT3 -RAs在统计学上是相等的,因此不应成为阻碍其用于治疗/预防术后恶心呕吐的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Haloperidol Versus 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists for Postoperative Vomiting and QTc Prolongation: A Noninferiority Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Haloperidol is an antipsychotic with well-known antiemetic potential. It is underutilized for postoperative nausea vomiting due to reported corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation. This meta-analysis evaluates its safety and efficacy as an antiemetic in the perioperative period. Trials comparing haloperidol to 5-HT3 -receptor antagonists (5-HT3 -RA) for 24 postoperative vomiting incidences published up to May 2017 were searched in the medical database. Comparisons were made for antiemetic efficiency variables (vomiting incidence, rescue antiemetic need, and patients with complete response) during early (until 6 hours) and late postoperative phases. Eight randomized controlled double-blinded trials were included in the final analysis. Twenty-four-hour vomiting incidence was similar in groups (fixed effects, P = 0.52, I2 = 0%). Trial-sequential analysis confirmed noninferiority of haloperidol over 5-HT3 -RAs (α = 5%, β = 20%, δ = 10%), with "information size" being 859 (required > 812). Pooled results did not demonstrate superiority/inferiority of 5-HT3 -RAs over haloperidol in all other antiemetic efficacy variables (early and delayed). Negligible heterogeneity was found in all the comparisons made. Pooled Mantel Haenszel odds ratio for QTc prolongation was equivalent in both groups (fixed effects, P = 0.23, I2 = 0%). The mean dose of haloperidol used was 1.34 mg, and no trial reported extrapyramidal side effects. Trial-sequential analysis showed statistical equivalence (α = 5%, β = 20%, δ = 10%), with information size being 745 (required > 591). Publication bias was unlikely (Egger test, X-intercept = 2.07, P = 0.10). We conclude that haloperidol is equivalent to the well-established 5-HT3 -RAs in preventing vomiting during the first day after surgery. The incidence of QTc prolongation with haloperidol is statistically equivalent to 5-HT3 -RAs and thus should not be the factor that discourages its use for treatment/prophylaxis of postoperative nausea vomiting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
176
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信