Michelle L A Nelson, Elizabeth Hanna, Stephen Hall, Michael Calvert
{"title":"是什么让中风康复患者变得复杂?临床医生的观点和出院压力的作用。","authors":"Michelle L A Nelson, Elizabeth Hanna, Stephen Hall, Michael Calvert","doi":"10.15256/joc.2016.6.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 80% of people who survive a stroke have on average five other conditions and a wide range of psychosocial issues. Attention to biopsychosocial issues has led to the identification of 'complex patients'. No single definition of 'patient complexity' exists; therefore, applied health researchers seek to understand 'patient complexity' as it relates to a specific clinical context.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand how 'patient complexity' is conceptualized by clinicians, and to position the findings within the existing literature on patient complexity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive approach was utilized. Twenty-three stroke rehabilitation clinicians participated in four focus groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five elements of patient complexity were identified: medical/functional issues, social determinant factors, social/family support, personal characteristics, and health system factors. Using biopsychosocial factors to identify complexity results in all patients being complex; operationalization of the definition led to the identification of systemic elements. A disconnect between acute, inpatient rehabilitation and community services was identified as a trigger for increased complexity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient complexity is not a dichotomous state. If applying existing complexity definitions, all patients are complex. This study extends the understanding by suggesting a structural element of complexity from manageable to less manageable complexity based on ability to discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":92071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comorbidity","volume":"6 2","pages":"35-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15256/joc.2016.6.63","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What makes stroke rehabilitation patients complex? Clinician perspectives and the role of discharge pressure.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle L A Nelson, Elizabeth Hanna, Stephen Hall, Michael Calvert\",\"doi\":\"10.15256/joc.2016.6.63\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 80% of people who survive a stroke have on average five other conditions and a wide range of psychosocial issues. Attention to biopsychosocial issues has led to the identification of 'complex patients'. No single definition of 'patient complexity' exists; therefore, applied health researchers seek to understand 'patient complexity' as it relates to a specific clinical context.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand how 'patient complexity' is conceptualized by clinicians, and to position the findings within the existing literature on patient complexity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive approach was utilized. Twenty-three stroke rehabilitation clinicians participated in four focus groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five elements of patient complexity were identified: medical/functional issues, social determinant factors, social/family support, personal characteristics, and health system factors. Using biopsychosocial factors to identify complexity results in all patients being complex; operationalization of the definition led to the identification of systemic elements. A disconnect between acute, inpatient rehabilitation and community services was identified as a trigger for increased complexity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient complexity is not a dichotomous state. If applying existing complexity definitions, all patients are complex. This study extends the understanding by suggesting a structural element of complexity from manageable to less manageable complexity based on ability to discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"35-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15256/joc.2016.6.63\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2016.6.63\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2016.6.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
What makes stroke rehabilitation patients complex? Clinician perspectives and the role of discharge pressure.
Background: Approximately 80% of people who survive a stroke have on average five other conditions and a wide range of psychosocial issues. Attention to biopsychosocial issues has led to the identification of 'complex patients'. No single definition of 'patient complexity' exists; therefore, applied health researchers seek to understand 'patient complexity' as it relates to a specific clinical context.
Objective: To understand how 'patient complexity' is conceptualized by clinicians, and to position the findings within the existing literature on patient complexity.
Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach was utilized. Twenty-three stroke rehabilitation clinicians participated in four focus groups.
Results: Five elements of patient complexity were identified: medical/functional issues, social determinant factors, social/family support, personal characteristics, and health system factors. Using biopsychosocial factors to identify complexity results in all patients being complex; operationalization of the definition led to the identification of systemic elements. A disconnect between acute, inpatient rehabilitation and community services was identified as a trigger for increased complexity.
Conclusions: Patient complexity is not a dichotomous state. If applying existing complexity definitions, all patients are complex. This study extends the understanding by suggesting a structural element of complexity from manageable to less manageable complexity based on ability to discharge.