Robert G Maunder, Lesley Wiesenfeld, Sian Rawkins, Jamie Park
{"title":"C4量表的发展:衡量门诊精神病学复杂护理的共同特征。","authors":"Robert G Maunder, Lesley Wiesenfeld, Sian Rawkins, Jamie Park","doi":"10.15256/joc.2016.6.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychiatric syndromes are complicated by comorbidity and other factors that burden patients, making guideline-informed psychiatric care challenging, and negatively affecting outcome. A comprehensive intake tool could improve the quality of care. Existing tools to quantify these characteristics do not identify specific complications and may not be sensitive to phenomena that are common in psychiatric outpatients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a practical inventory to capture observations related to complex care in psychiatric outpatients and quantify the overall burden of complicating factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We developed a checklist inventory through literature review and clinical experience. The inventory was tested and compared with related measures in a cross-sectional study of 410 consenting outpatients at the time of initial assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The summed score of inventory checklist items was significantly correlated with patient-assessed measures of distress (K10, <i>r</i>=0.36) and function (WHODAS 2.0, <i>r</i>=0.31), and physician-assessed measures of function (GAF, <i>r</i>=-0.42), number of psychiatric diagnoses [<i>F</i>(df3)=33.6], and most complex diagnosis [<i>F</i>(df3)=37.4]. In 53 patients whose assessment was observed by two clinicians, inter-rater reliability was acceptable for both total inventory score (intraclass correlation, single measures = 0.74) and agreement on specific items (mean agreement score = 90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Psychiatric C4 Inventory is a reliable instrument for psychiatrists that captures information that may be useful for quality improvement and resource planning. It demonstrates convergent validity with measures of patient distress, function, and complexity. Further tests of validity and replication in other settings are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":92071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comorbidity","volume":"6 2","pages":"56-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15256/joc.2016.6.66","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the C4 inventory: a measure of common characteristics that complicate care in outpatient psychiatry.\",\"authors\":\"Robert G Maunder, Lesley Wiesenfeld, Sian Rawkins, Jamie Park\",\"doi\":\"10.15256/joc.2016.6.66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychiatric syndromes are complicated by comorbidity and other factors that burden patients, making guideline-informed psychiatric care challenging, and negatively affecting outcome. A comprehensive intake tool could improve the quality of care. Existing tools to quantify these characteristics do not identify specific complications and may not be sensitive to phenomena that are common in psychiatric outpatients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a practical inventory to capture observations related to complex care in psychiatric outpatients and quantify the overall burden of complicating factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We developed a checklist inventory through literature review and clinical experience. The inventory was tested and compared with related measures in a cross-sectional study of 410 consenting outpatients at the time of initial assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The summed score of inventory checklist items was significantly correlated with patient-assessed measures of distress (K10, <i>r</i>=0.36) and function (WHODAS 2.0, <i>r</i>=0.31), and physician-assessed measures of function (GAF, <i>r</i>=-0.42), number of psychiatric diagnoses [<i>F</i>(df3)=33.6], and most complex diagnosis [<i>F</i>(df3)=37.4]. In 53 patients whose assessment was observed by two clinicians, inter-rater reliability was acceptable for both total inventory score (intraclass correlation, single measures = 0.74) and agreement on specific items (mean agreement score = 90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Psychiatric C4 Inventory is a reliable instrument for psychiatrists that captures information that may be useful for quality improvement and resource planning. It demonstrates convergent validity with measures of patient distress, function, and complexity. Further tests of validity and replication in other settings are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"56-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15256/joc.2016.6.66\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2016.6.66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2016.6.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of the C4 inventory: a measure of common characteristics that complicate care in outpatient psychiatry.
Background: Psychiatric syndromes are complicated by comorbidity and other factors that burden patients, making guideline-informed psychiatric care challenging, and negatively affecting outcome. A comprehensive intake tool could improve the quality of care. Existing tools to quantify these characteristics do not identify specific complications and may not be sensitive to phenomena that are common in psychiatric outpatients.
Objective: To develop a practical inventory to capture observations related to complex care in psychiatric outpatients and quantify the overall burden of complicating factors.
Design: We developed a checklist inventory through literature review and clinical experience. The inventory was tested and compared with related measures in a cross-sectional study of 410 consenting outpatients at the time of initial assessment.
Results: The summed score of inventory checklist items was significantly correlated with patient-assessed measures of distress (K10, r=0.36) and function (WHODAS 2.0, r=0.31), and physician-assessed measures of function (GAF, r=-0.42), number of psychiatric diagnoses [F(df3)=33.6], and most complex diagnosis [F(df3)=37.4]. In 53 patients whose assessment was observed by two clinicians, inter-rater reliability was acceptable for both total inventory score (intraclass correlation, single measures = 0.74) and agreement on specific items (mean agreement score = 90%).
Conclusions: The Psychiatric C4 Inventory is a reliable instrument for psychiatrists that captures information that may be useful for quality improvement and resource planning. It demonstrates convergent validity with measures of patient distress, function, and complexity. Further tests of validity and replication in other settings are warranted.