C4量表的发展:衡量门诊精神病学复杂护理的共同特征。

Journal of comorbidity Pub Date : 2016-05-25 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.15256/joc.2016.6.66
Robert G Maunder, Lesley Wiesenfeld, Sian Rawkins, Jamie Park
{"title":"C4量表的发展:衡量门诊精神病学复杂护理的共同特征。","authors":"Robert G Maunder,&nbsp;Lesley Wiesenfeld,&nbsp;Sian Rawkins,&nbsp;Jamie Park","doi":"10.15256/joc.2016.6.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychiatric syndromes are complicated by comorbidity and other factors that burden patients, making guideline-informed psychiatric care challenging, and negatively affecting outcome. A comprehensive intake tool could improve the quality of care. Existing tools to quantify these characteristics do not identify specific complications and may not be sensitive to phenomena that are common in psychiatric outpatients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a practical inventory to capture observations related to complex care in psychiatric outpatients and quantify the overall burden of complicating factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We developed a checklist inventory through literature review and clinical experience. The inventory was tested and compared with related measures in a cross-sectional study of 410 consenting outpatients at the time of initial assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The summed score of inventory checklist items was significantly correlated with patient-assessed measures of distress (K10, <i>r</i>=0.36) and function (WHODAS 2.0, <i>r</i>=0.31), and physician-assessed measures of function (GAF, <i>r</i>=-0.42), number of psychiatric diagnoses [<i>F</i>(df3)=33.6], and most complex diagnosis [<i>F</i>(df3)=37.4]. In 53 patients whose assessment was observed by two clinicians, inter-rater reliability was acceptable for both total inventory score (intraclass correlation, single measures = 0.74) and agreement on specific items (mean agreement score = 90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Psychiatric C4 Inventory is a reliable instrument for psychiatrists that captures information that may be useful for quality improvement and resource planning. It demonstrates convergent validity with measures of patient distress, function, and complexity. Further tests of validity and replication in other settings are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":92071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comorbidity","volume":"6 2","pages":"56-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15256/joc.2016.6.66","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the C4 inventory: a measure of common characteristics that complicate care in outpatient psychiatry.\",\"authors\":\"Robert G Maunder,&nbsp;Lesley Wiesenfeld,&nbsp;Sian Rawkins,&nbsp;Jamie Park\",\"doi\":\"10.15256/joc.2016.6.66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychiatric syndromes are complicated by comorbidity and other factors that burden patients, making guideline-informed psychiatric care challenging, and negatively affecting outcome. A comprehensive intake tool could improve the quality of care. Existing tools to quantify these characteristics do not identify specific complications and may not be sensitive to phenomena that are common in psychiatric outpatients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a practical inventory to capture observations related to complex care in psychiatric outpatients and quantify the overall burden of complicating factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We developed a checklist inventory through literature review and clinical experience. The inventory was tested and compared with related measures in a cross-sectional study of 410 consenting outpatients at the time of initial assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The summed score of inventory checklist items was significantly correlated with patient-assessed measures of distress (K10, <i>r</i>=0.36) and function (WHODAS 2.0, <i>r</i>=0.31), and physician-assessed measures of function (GAF, <i>r</i>=-0.42), number of psychiatric diagnoses [<i>F</i>(df3)=33.6], and most complex diagnosis [<i>F</i>(df3)=37.4]. In 53 patients whose assessment was observed by two clinicians, inter-rater reliability was acceptable for both total inventory score (intraclass correlation, single measures = 0.74) and agreement on specific items (mean agreement score = 90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Psychiatric C4 Inventory is a reliable instrument for psychiatrists that captures information that may be useful for quality improvement and resource planning. It demonstrates convergent validity with measures of patient distress, function, and complexity. Further tests of validity and replication in other settings are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"56-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15256/joc.2016.6.66\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2016.6.66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2016.6.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:精神病学综合征因合并症和其他因素而复杂化,给患者带来负担,使指南告知的精神病学护理具有挑战性,并对结果产生负面影响。一个综合的摄入工具可以提高护理质量。现有的量化这些特征的工具不能确定具体的并发症,也可能对精神科门诊患者中常见的现象不敏感。目的:开发一种实用的清单,以捕获与精神科门诊患者复杂护理相关的观察结果,并量化复杂因素的总体负担。设计:我们通过文献回顾和临床经验制定了一个清单清单。在初步评估时,对410名同意门诊患者进行了横断面研究,对该清单进行了测试,并与相关措施进行了比较。结果:量表项目的总得分与患者评估的痛苦(K10, r=0.36)、功能(WHODAS 2.0, r=0.31)、医生评估的功能(GAF, r=-0.42)、精神诊断次数[F(df3)=33.6]、最复杂诊断[F(df3)=37.4]显著相关。在由两名临床医生观察评估的53例患者中,总体量表评分(类内相关性,单一测量值= 0.74)和特定项目的一致性(平均一致性评分= 90%)的评分间信度均可接受。结论:精神病学C4量表对精神科医生来说是一种可靠的工具,它可以获取有助于提高质量和资源规划的信息。它证明了与病人痛苦,功能和复杂性的措施收敛有效性。有必要在其他环境中进一步测试有效性和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development of the C4 inventory: a measure of common characteristics that complicate care in outpatient psychiatry.

Development of the C4 inventory: a measure of common characteristics that complicate care in outpatient psychiatry.

Development of the C4 inventory: a measure of common characteristics that complicate care in outpatient psychiatry.

Development of the C4 inventory: a measure of common characteristics that complicate care in outpatient psychiatry.

Background: Psychiatric syndromes are complicated by comorbidity and other factors that burden patients, making guideline-informed psychiatric care challenging, and negatively affecting outcome. A comprehensive intake tool could improve the quality of care. Existing tools to quantify these characteristics do not identify specific complications and may not be sensitive to phenomena that are common in psychiatric outpatients.

Objective: To develop a practical inventory to capture observations related to complex care in psychiatric outpatients and quantify the overall burden of complicating factors.

Design: We developed a checklist inventory through literature review and clinical experience. The inventory was tested and compared with related measures in a cross-sectional study of 410 consenting outpatients at the time of initial assessment.

Results: The summed score of inventory checklist items was significantly correlated with patient-assessed measures of distress (K10, r=0.36) and function (WHODAS 2.0, r=0.31), and physician-assessed measures of function (GAF, r=-0.42), number of psychiatric diagnoses [F(df3)=33.6], and most complex diagnosis [F(df3)=37.4]. In 53 patients whose assessment was observed by two clinicians, inter-rater reliability was acceptable for both total inventory score (intraclass correlation, single measures = 0.74) and agreement on specific items (mean agreement score = 90%).

Conclusions: The Psychiatric C4 Inventory is a reliable instrument for psychiatrists that captures information that may be useful for quality improvement and resource planning. It demonstrates convergent validity with measures of patient distress, function, and complexity. Further tests of validity and replication in other settings are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信