根据胎龄诊断自闭症的可能性

Ashley Darcy-Mahoney PhD, NNP, FAAN , Bonnie Minter MSN, CRNP , Melinda Higgins PhD , Ying Guo PhD , Bryan Williams , Lauren M. Head Zauche RN, BSN , Katie Birth MSN, CRNP
{"title":"根据胎龄诊断自闭症的可能性","authors":"Ashley Darcy-Mahoney PhD, NNP, FAAN ,&nbsp;Bonnie Minter MSN, CRNP ,&nbsp;Melinda Higgins PhD ,&nbsp;Ying Guo PhD ,&nbsp;Bryan Williams ,&nbsp;Lauren M. Head Zauche RN, BSN ,&nbsp;Katie Birth MSN, CRNP","doi":"10.1053/j.nainr.2016.09.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Early preterm infants (EPT) (&lt;33 6/7<!--> <span>weeks) are at increased risk for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) but prevalence estimates vary widely across studies. Furthermore, there are very few studies addressing the association between late preterm (LPT) births (34–36 6/7</span> <span><span>weeks) and ASDs. To address the question of whether LPT infants carry the same risk for ASDs as full-term infants, this study aimed to estimate the relative probability of an ASD diagnosis using Bayes rule. A retrospective cohort analysis of 406 children was undertaken to look at gestational age, ASDs, and </span>birth history. The application of Bayes rule was used, given that there is not sufficient information about the joint probabilities related to prematurity and autism. Using the estimated gestational age proportions within ASD diagnosis, plus national estimates of ASDs, probabilities for ASDs within a given gestational age were calculated. Among these 406 children with ASDs, 6.7% were EPT and 10.6% were LPT. In comparison to full term, EPT children are at 1.9 multiplicative increase in risk (95% CI [1.3, 2.5]). While the probability of ASDs for LPT children was higher than that for term, the estimated relative risk of the LPT infants was not statistically significant (95% CI [0.9, 1.5]). EPT infants were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with ASDs compared to their term peers. While the relative probability of ASD diagnosis among children born LPT was not statistically significant in this limited sample, the results indicate a possible elevated risk. A larger cohort is needed to adequately estimate this risk.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":87414,"journal":{"name":"Newborn and infant nursing reviews : NAINR","volume":"16 4","pages":"Pages 322-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.nainr.2016.09.019","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probability of an Autism Diagnosis by Gestational Age\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Darcy-Mahoney PhD, NNP, FAAN ,&nbsp;Bonnie Minter MSN, CRNP ,&nbsp;Melinda Higgins PhD ,&nbsp;Ying Guo PhD ,&nbsp;Bryan Williams ,&nbsp;Lauren M. Head Zauche RN, BSN ,&nbsp;Katie Birth MSN, CRNP\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.nainr.2016.09.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Early preterm infants (EPT) (&lt;33 6/7<!--> <span>weeks) are at increased risk for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) but prevalence estimates vary widely across studies. Furthermore, there are very few studies addressing the association between late preterm (LPT) births (34–36 6/7</span> <span><span>weeks) and ASDs. To address the question of whether LPT infants carry the same risk for ASDs as full-term infants, this study aimed to estimate the relative probability of an ASD diagnosis using Bayes rule. A retrospective cohort analysis of 406 children was undertaken to look at gestational age, ASDs, and </span>birth history. The application of Bayes rule was used, given that there is not sufficient information about the joint probabilities related to prematurity and autism. Using the estimated gestational age proportions within ASD diagnosis, plus national estimates of ASDs, probabilities for ASDs within a given gestational age were calculated. Among these 406 children with ASDs, 6.7% were EPT and 10.6% were LPT. In comparison to full term, EPT children are at 1.9 multiplicative increase in risk (95% CI [1.3, 2.5]). While the probability of ASDs for LPT children was higher than that for term, the estimated relative risk of the LPT infants was not statistically significant (95% CI [0.9, 1.5]). EPT infants were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with ASDs compared to their term peers. While the relative probability of ASD diagnosis among children born LPT was not statistically significant in this limited sample, the results indicate a possible elevated risk. A larger cohort is needed to adequately estimate this risk.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Newborn and infant nursing reviews : NAINR\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 322-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.nainr.2016.09.019\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Newborn and infant nursing reviews : NAINR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1527336916301003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Newborn and infant nursing reviews : NAINR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1527336916301003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

早期早产儿(33 6/7周)患自闭症谱系障碍(asd)的风险增加,但不同研究的患病率估计差异很大。此外,很少有研究涉及晚期早产(LPT)出生(34-36 6/7周)与自闭症之间的关系。为了解决LPT婴儿患ASD的风险是否与足月婴儿相同的问题,本研究旨在使用贝叶斯规则估计ASD诊断的相对概率。对406名儿童进行回顾性队列分析,观察其胎龄、自闭症和出生史。考虑到早产儿和自闭症相关的联合概率信息不足,采用贝叶斯规则。使用ASD诊断中估计的胎龄比例,加上国家估计的ASD,计算给定胎龄内ASD的概率。406例asd患儿中,EPT患儿占6.7%,LPT患儿占10.6%。与足月相比,EPT患儿的风险增加1.9倍(95% CI[1.3, 2.5])。虽然LPT患儿患asd的概率高于足月患儿,但LPT患儿的估计相对风险无统计学意义(95% CI[0.9, 1.5])。与足月婴儿相比,EPT婴儿被诊断为asd的可能性明显更高。虽然在这个有限的样本中,LPT出生的儿童诊断ASD的相对概率没有统计学意义,但结果表明可能存在风险升高。需要一个更大的队列来充分估计这种风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probability of an Autism Diagnosis by Gestational Age

Early preterm infants (EPT) (<33 6/7 weeks) are at increased risk for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) but prevalence estimates vary widely across studies. Furthermore, there are very few studies addressing the association between late preterm (LPT) births (34–36 6/7 weeks) and ASDs. To address the question of whether LPT infants carry the same risk for ASDs as full-term infants, this study aimed to estimate the relative probability of an ASD diagnosis using Bayes rule. A retrospective cohort analysis of 406 children was undertaken to look at gestational age, ASDs, and birth history. The application of Bayes rule was used, given that there is not sufficient information about the joint probabilities related to prematurity and autism. Using the estimated gestational age proportions within ASD diagnosis, plus national estimates of ASDs, probabilities for ASDs within a given gestational age were calculated. Among these 406 children with ASDs, 6.7% were EPT and 10.6% were LPT. In comparison to full term, EPT children are at 1.9 multiplicative increase in risk (95% CI [1.3, 2.5]). While the probability of ASDs for LPT children was higher than that for term, the estimated relative risk of the LPT infants was not statistically significant (95% CI [0.9, 1.5]). EPT infants were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with ASDs compared to their term peers. While the relative probability of ASD diagnosis among children born LPT was not statistically significant in this limited sample, the results indicate a possible elevated risk. A larger cohort is needed to adequately estimate this risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信