胜率--医学研究中一种直观易解的综合结果。

Hongyue Wang, Jing Peng, Juila Z Zheng, Bokai Wang, Xiang Lu, Chongshu Chen, Xin M Tu, Changyong Feng
{"title":"胜率--医学研究中一种直观易解的综合结果。","authors":"Hongyue Wang, Jing Peng, Juila Z Zheng, Bokai Wang, Xiang Lu, Chongshu Chen, Xin M Tu, Changyong Feng","doi":"10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In medical studies with multiple outcomes, researchers always need to make choices as to whether to use a composite outcome (after combining multiple outcomes) as their primary outcome. In this paper we review a new measurement of the treatment effect - win ratio, which can be easily used in studies with prioritized multiple outcomes. We also propose some research topics to be done in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":21886,"journal":{"name":"Shanghai archives of psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ba/c7/sap-29-55.PMC5518256.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Win Ratio -An Intuitive and Easy-To-Interpret Composite Outcome in Medical Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Hongyue Wang, Jing Peng, Juila Z Zheng, Bokai Wang, Xiang Lu, Chongshu Chen, Xin M Tu, Changyong Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In medical studies with multiple outcomes, researchers always need to make choices as to whether to use a composite outcome (after combining multiple outcomes) as their primary outcome. In this paper we review a new measurement of the treatment effect - win ratio, which can be easily used in studies with prioritized multiple outcomes. We also propose some research topics to be done in this area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shanghai archives of psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ba/c7/sap-29-55.PMC5518256.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shanghai archives of psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shanghai archives of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在具有多种结果的医学研究中,研究人员总是需要选择是否使用综合结果(合并多种结果后)作为主要结果。在本文中,我们将评述一种新的治疗效果测量方法--胜率,它可以轻松地用于具有多种优先结果的研究中。我们还提出了一些这方面的研究课题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Win Ratio -An Intuitive and Easy-To-Interpret Composite Outcome in Medical Studies.

Win Ratio -An Intuitive and Easy-To-Interpret Composite Outcome in Medical Studies.

Win Ratio -An Intuitive and Easy-To-Interpret Composite Outcome in Medical Studies.

Win Ratio -An Intuitive and Easy-To-Interpret Composite Outcome in Medical Studies.

In medical studies with multiple outcomes, researchers always need to make choices as to whether to use a composite outcome (after combining multiple outcomes) as their primary outcome. In this paper we review a new measurement of the treatment effect - win ratio, which can be easily used in studies with prioritized multiple outcomes. We also propose some research topics to be done in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2341
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信