Rudas-Clogg-Lindsay混合拟合指数的偏差校正估计。

Jenő Reiczigel, Márton Ispány, Gábor Tusnády, György Michaletzky, Marco Marozzi
{"title":"Rudas-Clogg-Lindsay混合拟合指数的偏差校正估计。","authors":"Jenő Reiczigel,&nbsp;Márton Ispány,&nbsp;Gábor Tusnády,&nbsp;György Michaletzky,&nbsp;Marco Marozzi","doi":"10.1111/bmsp.12118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rudas, Clogg, and Lindsay (1994, J. R Stat Soc. Ser. B, 56, 623) introduced the so-called mixture index of fit, also known as pi-star (π*), for quantifying the goodness of fit of a model. It is the lowest proportion of 'contamination' which, if removed from the population or from the sample, makes the fit of the model perfect. The mixture index of fit has been widely used in psychometric studies. We show that the asymptotic confidence limits proposed by Rudas et al. (1994, J. R Stat Soc. Ser. B, 56, 623) as well as the jackknife confidence interval by Dayton (, Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol., 56, 1) perform poorly, and propose a new bias-corrected point estimate, a bootstrap test and confidence limits for pi-star. The proposed confidence limits have coverage probability much closer to the nominal level than the other methods do. We illustrate the usefulness of the proposed method in practice by presenting some practical applications to log-linear models for contingency tables.</p>","PeriodicalId":272649,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology","volume":"71 3","pages":"459-471"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/bmsp.12118","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bias-corrected estimation of the Rudas-Clogg-Lindsay mixture index of fit.\",\"authors\":\"Jenő Reiczigel,&nbsp;Márton Ispány,&nbsp;Gábor Tusnády,&nbsp;György Michaletzky,&nbsp;Marco Marozzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bmsp.12118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rudas, Clogg, and Lindsay (1994, J. R Stat Soc. Ser. B, 56, 623) introduced the so-called mixture index of fit, also known as pi-star (π*), for quantifying the goodness of fit of a model. It is the lowest proportion of 'contamination' which, if removed from the population or from the sample, makes the fit of the model perfect. The mixture index of fit has been widely used in psychometric studies. We show that the asymptotic confidence limits proposed by Rudas et al. (1994, J. R Stat Soc. Ser. B, 56, 623) as well as the jackknife confidence interval by Dayton (, Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol., 56, 1) perform poorly, and propose a new bias-corrected point estimate, a bootstrap test and confidence limits for pi-star. The proposed confidence limits have coverage probability much closer to the nominal level than the other methods do. We illustrate the usefulness of the proposed method in practice by presenting some practical applications to log-linear models for contingency tables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":272649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology\",\"volume\":\"71 3\",\"pages\":\"459-471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/bmsp.12118\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Rudas, Clogg, and Lindsay (1994, J. R . Stat Soc。爵士。B, 56,623)引入了所谓的混合拟合指数,也称为pi-star (π*),用于量化模型的拟合优度。它是最低比例的“污染”,如果从总体或样本中去除,使模型的拟合完美。混合拟合指数在心理测量学研究中得到了广泛的应用。我们证明了Rudas et al. (1994, J. R . Stat Soc.)提出的渐近置信限。爵士。(B, 56, 623)以及由Dayton (, Br)提出的刀切置信区间。j .数学。统计,Psychol。, 56,1)表现不佳,并提出了一个新的偏差校正点估计,一个自举检验和pi-star的置信限。所提出的置信限的覆盖概率比其他方法更接近名义水平。我们通过介绍列联表的对数线性模型的一些实际应用来说明所提出的方法在实践中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bias-corrected estimation of the Rudas-Clogg-Lindsay mixture index of fit.

Rudas, Clogg, and Lindsay (1994, J. R Stat Soc. Ser. B, 56, 623) introduced the so-called mixture index of fit, also known as pi-star (π*), for quantifying the goodness of fit of a model. It is the lowest proportion of 'contamination' which, if removed from the population or from the sample, makes the fit of the model perfect. The mixture index of fit has been widely used in psychometric studies. We show that the asymptotic confidence limits proposed by Rudas et al. (1994, J. R Stat Soc. Ser. B, 56, 623) as well as the jackknife confidence interval by Dayton (, Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol., 56, 1) perform poorly, and propose a new bias-corrected point estimate, a bootstrap test and confidence limits for pi-star. The proposed confidence limits have coverage probability much closer to the nominal level than the other methods do. We illustrate the usefulness of the proposed method in practice by presenting some practical applications to log-linear models for contingency tables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信