异常子宫出血的初级保健子宫内膜取样:一项初步研究。

Q Medicine
Jon M Dickson, Brigitte Delaney, Mary E Connor
{"title":"异常子宫出血的初级保健子宫内膜取样:一项初步研究。","authors":"Jon M Dickson,&nbsp;Brigitte Delaney,&nbsp;Mary E Connor","doi":"10.1136/jfprhc-2017-101735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To design and evaluate a pilot service for primary care endometrial sampling (PCES).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of data from two service evaluations.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>General practices and the gynaecology department in a large city in the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>These were two-fold: (1) To design the new service we identified all the endometrial samples taken in the city's gynaecology department in 2012/2013 and estimated the proportion of these with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) that would be suitable for PCES. (2) To evaluate the new PCES service we analysed data from the first year of activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) A total of 1894 endometrial samples were taken in hospital in 2012/2013. An estimated 424 (22.4%) of these were from patients with AUB who fitted the criteria for PCES. (2) In the first year of the PCES service 108 samples were taken by general practitioners (GPs). Initial management of these patients was exclusively in primary care in 97.2% (104/108) of cases; most patients were treated with the Mirena intrauterine system (79/109; 73.1%) and there were no cases of hyperplasia or cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most premenopausal patients with AUB could potentially be managed in primary care without referral to hospital if endometrial sampling (ES) was made available to appropriately trained and supported GPs. However, this study was limited by its retrospective, non-interventional design, and more research is required to demonstrate safety and cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":15734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"296-301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jfprhc-2017-101735","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary care endometrial sampling for abnormal uterine bleeding: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Jon M Dickson,&nbsp;Brigitte Delaney,&nbsp;Mary E Connor\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jfprhc-2017-101735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To design and evaluate a pilot service for primary care endometrial sampling (PCES).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of data from two service evaluations.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>General practices and the gynaecology department in a large city in the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>These were two-fold: (1) To design the new service we identified all the endometrial samples taken in the city's gynaecology department in 2012/2013 and estimated the proportion of these with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) that would be suitable for PCES. (2) To evaluate the new PCES service we analysed data from the first year of activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) A total of 1894 endometrial samples were taken in hospital in 2012/2013. An estimated 424 (22.4%) of these were from patients with AUB who fitted the criteria for PCES. (2) In the first year of the PCES service 108 samples were taken by general practitioners (GPs). Initial management of these patients was exclusively in primary care in 97.2% (104/108) of cases; most patients were treated with the Mirena intrauterine system (79/109; 73.1%) and there were no cases of hyperplasia or cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most premenopausal patients with AUB could potentially be managed in primary care without referral to hospital if endometrial sampling (ES) was made available to appropriately trained and supported GPs. However, this study was limited by its retrospective, non-interventional design, and more research is required to demonstrate safety and cost-effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"296-301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jfprhc-2017-101735\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2017-101735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/8/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2017-101735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:设计和评估初级保健子宫内膜取样(PCES)的试点服务。设计:回顾性分析两项服务评估的数据。环境:一般做法和妇科在一个大城市在英国。方法:(1)为了设计新的服务,我们确定了2012/2013年在该市妇科采集的所有子宫内膜样本,并估计了适合PCES的子宫异常出血(AUB)的比例。(2)为了评估新的PCES服务,我们分析了第一年的数据。结果:(1)2012/2013年共采集子宫内膜标本1894份。其中估计有424例(22.4%)来自符合PCES标准的AUB患者。(2)在PCES服务的第一年,全科医生(gp)采集了108份样本。97.2%(104/108)的患者最初只接受初级保健治疗;大多数患者接受宫内系统治疗(79/109;73.1%),无增生、癌病例。结论:如果子宫内膜取样(ES)能够提供给经过适当培训和支持的全科医生,大多数绝经前AUB患者可以在初级保健中进行治疗,而无需转诊到医院。然而,该研究受限于其回顾性、非介入设计,需要更多的研究来证明安全性和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary care endometrial sampling for abnormal uterine bleeding: a pilot study.

Aim: To design and evaluate a pilot service for primary care endometrial sampling (PCES).

Design: Retrospective analysis of data from two service evaluations.

Setting: General practices and the gynaecology department in a large city in the UK.

Methods: These were two-fold: (1) To design the new service we identified all the endometrial samples taken in the city's gynaecology department in 2012/2013 and estimated the proportion of these with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) that would be suitable for PCES. (2) To evaluate the new PCES service we analysed data from the first year of activity.

Results: (1) A total of 1894 endometrial samples were taken in hospital in 2012/2013. An estimated 424 (22.4%) of these were from patients with AUB who fitted the criteria for PCES. (2) In the first year of the PCES service 108 samples were taken by general practitioners (GPs). Initial management of these patients was exclusively in primary care in 97.2% (104/108) of cases; most patients were treated with the Mirena intrauterine system (79/109; 73.1%) and there were no cases of hyperplasia or cancer.

Conclusions: Most premenopausal patients with AUB could potentially be managed in primary care without referral to hospital if endometrial sampling (ES) was made available to appropriately trained and supported GPs. However, this study was limited by its retrospective, non-interventional design, and more research is required to demonstrate safety and cost-effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.84
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The trading of Professional, Managerial & Healthcare Publications Ltd has been transferred to its parent company, Keyways Publishing Ltd.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信