Sophia M Hünnebeck, Petra Magosch, Peter Habermeyer, Markus Loew, Sven Lichtenberg
{"title":"肩关节软骨缺损:肩关节微骨折后的长期预后。","authors":"Sophia M Hünnebeck, Petra Magosch, Peter Habermeyer, Markus Loew, Sven Lichtenberg","doi":"10.1007/s11678-017-0415-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An increasing number of young patients are diagnosed with chondral lesions. Minimally invasive surgical techniques are important in order to delay progression of the early stages of osteoarthritis and the need for total joint replacement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients (<i>n</i> = 32) who had received microfracturing of the shoulder were retrospectively enrolled, of whom 5 had received shoulder replacements after a mean time of 47 months. Of these patients, 23 completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Constant-Murley Scores in addition to an additional subjective questionnaire. Patients were then clinically examined and received x‑ray analysis of the operated shoulder. Data from an additional 4 patients were acquired by telephone interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean follow-up was 105 months. Of the included patients, 13/27 patients reported no pain, 12/27 patients moderate pain. Of these 12, 6/27 reported pain only at night and 3/27 only during rest. Concerning the outcome of surgery, 19/27 patients were \"satisfied\" or \"very satisfied\". There was a statistically significant increase in internal rotation, but no further differences in the range of motion pre- and postoperatively. Patients without any signs of osteoarthritis before surgery showed statistically significantly better outcomes. There was a statistically significant increase in radiological signs of osteoarthrosis in pre- versus postoperative patients. Patients with bipolar lesions showed statistically significantly poorer Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though microfracturing does not prevent radiographic progression, microfracture of the glenohumeral joint might be worth considering as part of a treatment regimen for younger patients who may not yet be treated with arthroplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":43682,"journal":{"name":"Obere Extremitaet-Schulter-Ellenbogen-Hand-Upper Extremity-Shoulder Elbow Hand","volume":"12 3","pages":"165-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11678-017-0415-3","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chondral defects of the glenohumeral joint: Long-term outcome after microfracturing of the shoulder.\",\"authors\":\"Sophia M Hünnebeck, Petra Magosch, Peter Habermeyer, Markus Loew, Sven Lichtenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11678-017-0415-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An increasing number of young patients are diagnosed with chondral lesions. Minimally invasive surgical techniques are important in order to delay progression of the early stages of osteoarthritis and the need for total joint replacement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients (<i>n</i> = 32) who had received microfracturing of the shoulder were retrospectively enrolled, of whom 5 had received shoulder replacements after a mean time of 47 months. Of these patients, 23 completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Constant-Murley Scores in addition to an additional subjective questionnaire. Patients were then clinically examined and received x‑ray analysis of the operated shoulder. Data from an additional 4 patients were acquired by telephone interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean follow-up was 105 months. Of the included patients, 13/27 patients reported no pain, 12/27 patients moderate pain. Of these 12, 6/27 reported pain only at night and 3/27 only during rest. Concerning the outcome of surgery, 19/27 patients were \\\"satisfied\\\" or \\\"very satisfied\\\". There was a statistically significant increase in internal rotation, but no further differences in the range of motion pre- and postoperatively. Patients without any signs of osteoarthritis before surgery showed statistically significantly better outcomes. There was a statistically significant increase in radiological signs of osteoarthrosis in pre- versus postoperative patients. Patients with bipolar lesions showed statistically significantly poorer Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though microfracturing does not prevent radiographic progression, microfracture of the glenohumeral joint might be worth considering as part of a treatment regimen for younger patients who may not yet be treated with arthroplasty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obere Extremitaet-Schulter-Ellenbogen-Hand-Upper Extremity-Shoulder Elbow Hand\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"165-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11678-017-0415-3\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obere Extremitaet-Schulter-Ellenbogen-Hand-Upper Extremity-Shoulder Elbow Hand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-017-0415-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obere Extremitaet-Schulter-Ellenbogen-Hand-Upper Extremity-Shoulder Elbow Hand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-017-0415-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Chondral defects of the glenohumeral joint: Long-term outcome after microfracturing of the shoulder.
Introduction: An increasing number of young patients are diagnosed with chondral lesions. Minimally invasive surgical techniques are important in order to delay progression of the early stages of osteoarthritis and the need for total joint replacement.
Materials and methods: Patients (n = 32) who had received microfracturing of the shoulder were retrospectively enrolled, of whom 5 had received shoulder replacements after a mean time of 47 months. Of these patients, 23 completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Constant-Murley Scores in addition to an additional subjective questionnaire. Patients were then clinically examined and received x‑ray analysis of the operated shoulder. Data from an additional 4 patients were acquired by telephone interview.
Results: Mean follow-up was 105 months. Of the included patients, 13/27 patients reported no pain, 12/27 patients moderate pain. Of these 12, 6/27 reported pain only at night and 3/27 only during rest. Concerning the outcome of surgery, 19/27 patients were "satisfied" or "very satisfied". There was a statistically significant increase in internal rotation, but no further differences in the range of motion pre- and postoperatively. Patients without any signs of osteoarthritis before surgery showed statistically significantly better outcomes. There was a statistically significant increase in radiological signs of osteoarthrosis in pre- versus postoperative patients. Patients with bipolar lesions showed statistically significantly poorer Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) results.
Conclusion: Even though microfracturing does not prevent radiographic progression, microfracture of the glenohumeral joint might be worth considering as part of a treatment regimen for younger patients who may not yet be treated with arthroplasty.
期刊介绍:
Zielsetzung der Zeitschrift
Die Zeitschrift Obere Extremität widmet sich der Versorgung von Verletzungen, Verletzungsfolgen und Erkrankungen im Bereich des Schulter- und des Ellenbogengelenks.
Frei eingereichte Originalien präsentieren Forschungsergebnisse aktueller Studien im Bereich der Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie und fördern den wissenschaftlichen Austausch. Vielversprechende Studien, die derzeit durchgeführt werden, sind ebenso willkommen, wie Langzeitstudien, die bewährte Verfahren auf den Prüfstand stellen. Fallberichte beleuchten seltene Indikationen und schildern ungewöhnliche Behandlungsverläufe.
Umfassende Übersichtsarbeiten zu einem aktuellen Schwerpunktthema sind das Kernstück jeder Ausgabe. Im Mittelpunkt steht gesichertes Wissen mit hoher Relevanz für die tägliche Arbeit in der Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie. Zusätzlich wird in speziellen Rubriken über innovative Behandlungsmaßnahmen, Probleme in der Begutachtung, berufspolitische Entwicklungen und Kongressaktivitäten berichtet.
Als gemeinsames Kommunikations- und Weiterbildungsforum für alle Chirurg*innen und Orthopäd*innen mit entsprechender Spezialisierung ist die Zeitschrift Obere Extremität zukunftsorientiert und schließt eine wichtige Lücke im orthopädisch-unfallchirurgischen Informationsangebot.
Aims & scope
The journal Obere Extremität (Upper Extremity) is dedicated to the treatment of injuries, consequences of injuries and diseases in the area of the shoulder and elbow joint.
Freely submitted originals present research results of current studies in the field of shoulder and elbow surgery and promote scientific exchange. Promising studies that are currently being carried out are welcome, as are long-term studies that put proven procedures to the test. Case reports illuminate rare indications and describe unusual courses of treatment.
Comprehensive reviews on a current focus topic are the core of each issue. The focus is on secured knowledge with high relevance for the daily work in shoulder and elbow surgery. In addition, special sections report on innovative treatment measures, problems in assessment, professional policy developments and congress activities.
As a joint communication and further education forum for all surgeons and orthopaedic surgeons with appropriate specialisation, the journal Obere Extremität is future-oriented and closes an important gap in the orthopaedic trauma surgery information offer.
Begutachtung / Peer Review
Alle Beiträge, die bei der Zeitschrift Obere Extremität eingereicht werden (einschließlich der eingeladenen Manuskripte) durchlaufen ein Doppelblind-Peer-Review-Verfahren, an dem mindestens zwei unabhängige Experten beteiligt sind.---
All manuscripts submitted to the journal Obere Extremität (including invited manuscripts) undergo a double-blind peer review process involving at least two independent experts.
Ethische Richtlinien / Best Practice Guidelines and Publication Ethics
Die Zeitschrift Obere Extremität folgt den Richtlinien des Komitees für Publikationsethik (COPE). Autoren wird empfohlen, klinische Studien, die sie zur Veröffentlichung in Betracht ziehen, vor der Veröffentlichung in kostenlosen, öffentlichen Registern für klinische Studien (z.B. www.clinicaltrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.ifpma.org, http://isrctn.org, www.germanctr.de/online-Register_de.html) zu registrieren. Die Register sind nach den Richtlinien des International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) zu genehmigen. Die Autor*innen sollten am Ende ihres Abstracts den Namen des Studienregisters und ihre Registriernummer für klinische Studien angeben.
The journal Obere Extremität (Upper Extremity) follows the Committee of Publications Ethics (COPE) - Guidelines. Authors are recommended to register clinical trials they consider for publication in free, public clinical trial registries (e.g., www.clinicaltrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.ifpma.org, http://isrctn.org, www.germanctr.de/online-Register_de.html) before publication. The registries are to be approved by the guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Authors should include the name of the trial register and their clinical trial registration number at the end of their abstract.
Deklaration von Helsinki / Declaration of Helsinki
Alle zur Veröffentlichung eingereichten Manuskripte, die Ergebnisse von Studien an Proband*innen oder Patient*innen präsentieren, müssen gemäß den Autorenrichtlinien für Originalarbeiten der Deklaration von Helsinki entsprechen.
All Manuscripts submitted for publication presenting results from studies on probands or patients must comply with the Declaration of Helsinki according to the author guidelines for original papers.