你确定血管通畅吗?探讨影响慢性血液透析患者及其护士血管通路决策的因素。

CANNT journal = Journal ACITN Pub Date : 2016-04-01
Mary Ann Murray, Alison Thomas, Ron Wald, Rosa Marticorena, Sandra Donnelly, Lianne Jeffs
{"title":"你确定血管通畅吗?探讨影响慢性血液透析患者及其护士血管通路决策的因素。","authors":"Mary Ann Murray,&nbsp;Alison Thomas,&nbsp;Ron Wald,&nbsp;Rosa Marticorena,&nbsp;Sandra Donnelly,&nbsp;Lianne Jeffs","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A major decision for patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) relates to vascular access (VA) for treatment. Patients who receive pre-dialysis care often defer making a decision, which results in initiation of hemodialysis (HD) with a central venous catheter (CVC) in an urgent or emergent situation. Little is known about how individuals make decisions around VA. In this context, a mixed-methods study was undertaken to explore uncertainty related to changing their VA from an existing CVC to a graft or fistula. Quantitative assessment was measured using the SURE tool and interviews with patients and nurses were conducted. Results revealed that none of the 16 patient participants reported uncertainty. Qualitative findings revealed that patient decisions about access were impacted by observations, experiences, and dialogue in the hemodialysis unit. Study findings have important implications including the challenge of reconciling epidemiologic population-based risk measurement to the individual patient’s situation. Moreover, the SURE tool was viewed as a mechanism to open a dialogue to confirm patients’ decisions and provide further education and/or support following HD initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":83648,"journal":{"name":"CANNT journal = Journal ACITN","volume":"26 2","pages":"21-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are you SURE about your vascular access? Exploring factors influencing vascular access decisions with chronic hemodialysis patients and their nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Mary Ann Murray,&nbsp;Alison Thomas,&nbsp;Ron Wald,&nbsp;Rosa Marticorena,&nbsp;Sandra Donnelly,&nbsp;Lianne Jeffs\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A major decision for patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) relates to vascular access (VA) for treatment. Patients who receive pre-dialysis care often defer making a decision, which results in initiation of hemodialysis (HD) with a central venous catheter (CVC) in an urgent or emergent situation. Little is known about how individuals make decisions around VA. In this context, a mixed-methods study was undertaken to explore uncertainty related to changing their VA from an existing CVC to a graft or fistula. Quantitative assessment was measured using the SURE tool and interviews with patients and nurses were conducted. Results revealed that none of the 16 patient participants reported uncertainty. Qualitative findings revealed that patient decisions about access were impacted by observations, experiences, and dialogue in the hemodialysis unit. Study findings have important implications including the challenge of reconciling epidemiologic population-based risk measurement to the individual patient’s situation. Moreover, the SURE tool was viewed as a mechanism to open a dialogue to confirm patients’ decisions and provide further education and/or support following HD initiation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":83648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CANNT journal = Journal ACITN\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"21-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CANNT journal = Journal ACITN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANNT journal = Journal ACITN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

5期慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者的一个主要决定与血管通路(VA)治疗有关。接受透析前护理的患者往往推迟做出决定,这导致在紧急或紧急情况下开始使用中心静脉导管进行血液透析(HD)。人们对个体如何围绕VA做出决定知之甚少。在此背景下,进行了一项混合方法研究,以探讨将VA从现有CVC改为移植物或瘘管的不确定性。采用SURE工具进行定量评估,并对患者和护士进行访谈。结果显示,16名患者参与者中没有人报告不确定性。定性研究结果显示,患者关于获取的决定受到血液透析单位的观察、经验和对话的影响。研究结果具有重要的意义,包括协调流行病学基于人群的风险测量与个体患者情况的挑战。此外,SURE工具被视为一种开启对话的机制,以确认患者的决定,并在HD启动后提供进一步的教育和/或支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are you SURE about your vascular access? Exploring factors influencing vascular access decisions with chronic hemodialysis patients and their nurses.

A major decision for patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) relates to vascular access (VA) for treatment. Patients who receive pre-dialysis care often defer making a decision, which results in initiation of hemodialysis (HD) with a central venous catheter (CVC) in an urgent or emergent situation. Little is known about how individuals make decisions around VA. In this context, a mixed-methods study was undertaken to explore uncertainty related to changing their VA from an existing CVC to a graft or fistula. Quantitative assessment was measured using the SURE tool and interviews with patients and nurses were conducted. Results revealed that none of the 16 patient participants reported uncertainty. Qualitative findings revealed that patient decisions about access were impacted by observations, experiences, and dialogue in the hemodialysis unit. Study findings have important implications including the challenge of reconciling epidemiologic population-based risk measurement to the individual patient’s situation. Moreover, the SURE tool was viewed as a mechanism to open a dialogue to confirm patients’ decisions and provide further education and/or support following HD initiation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信