大麻二酚对健康人哌醋甲酯药动学的影响。

Q1 Medicine
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids Pub Date : 2022-11-04 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000527189
John S Markowitz, Ludmila De Faria, Qingchen Zhang, Philip W Melchert, Reginald F Frye, Brandon O Klee, Yuli Qian
{"title":"大麻二酚对健康人哌醋甲酯药动学的影响。","authors":"John S Markowitz,&nbsp;Ludmila De Faria,&nbsp;Qingchen Zhang,&nbsp;Philip W Melchert,&nbsp;Reginald F Frye,&nbsp;Brandon O Klee,&nbsp;Yuli Qian","doi":"10.1159/000527189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cannabidiol (CBD) is a widely utilized nonpsychoactive cannabinoid available as an over-the-counter supplement, a component of medical cannabis, and a prescriptive treatment of childhood epilepsies. In vitro studies suggest CBD may inhibit a number of drug-metabolizing enzymes, including carboxylesterase 1 (CES1). The aim of this study was to evaluate effect of CBD on the disposition of the CES1 substrate methylphenidate (MPH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 12 subjects ingested 750 mg of CBD solution, or alternatively, a placebo solution twice daily for a 3-day run-in period followed by an additional CBD dose (or placebo) and a single 10 mg dose of MPH and completed serial blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analysis. MPH and CBD concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The C<sub>max</sub> (mean ± CV) for the CBD group and placebo group was 13.5 ± 43.7% ng/mL and 12.2 ± 36.4% ng/mL, respectively. AUC<sub>inf</sub> (ng/mL*h) for the CBD group and placebo group was 70.7 ± 32.5% and 63.6 ± 25.4%, respectively. The CBD AUC<sub>0-8h</sub> (mean ± CV) was 1,542.2 ± 32% ng/mL*h, and C<sub>max</sub> was 389.2 ± 39% ng/mL. When compared to MPH only, the geometric mean ratio (CBD/control, 90% CI) for AUC<sub>inf</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> with CBD co-administration was 1.09 (0.89, 1.32) and 1.08 (0.85, 1.37), respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Although the upper bound of bioequivalence was not met, the mean estimates of AUC and C<sub>max</sub> ratios were generally small and unlikely to be of clinical significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":18415,"journal":{"name":"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids","volume":" ","pages":"199-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c5/6e/mca-0005-0199.PMC9710314.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Cannabidiol on the Pharmacokinetics of Methylphenidate in Healthy Subjects.\",\"authors\":\"John S Markowitz,&nbsp;Ludmila De Faria,&nbsp;Qingchen Zhang,&nbsp;Philip W Melchert,&nbsp;Reginald F Frye,&nbsp;Brandon O Klee,&nbsp;Yuli Qian\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000527189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cannabidiol (CBD) is a widely utilized nonpsychoactive cannabinoid available as an over-the-counter supplement, a component of medical cannabis, and a prescriptive treatment of childhood epilepsies. In vitro studies suggest CBD may inhibit a number of drug-metabolizing enzymes, including carboxylesterase 1 (CES1). The aim of this study was to evaluate effect of CBD on the disposition of the CES1 substrate methylphenidate (MPH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 12 subjects ingested 750 mg of CBD solution, or alternatively, a placebo solution twice daily for a 3-day run-in period followed by an additional CBD dose (or placebo) and a single 10 mg dose of MPH and completed serial blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analysis. MPH and CBD concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The C<sub>max</sub> (mean ± CV) for the CBD group and placebo group was 13.5 ± 43.7% ng/mL and 12.2 ± 36.4% ng/mL, respectively. AUC<sub>inf</sub> (ng/mL*h) for the CBD group and placebo group was 70.7 ± 32.5% and 63.6 ± 25.4%, respectively. The CBD AUC<sub>0-8h</sub> (mean ± CV) was 1,542.2 ± 32% ng/mL*h, and C<sub>max</sub> was 389.2 ± 39% ng/mL. When compared to MPH only, the geometric mean ratio (CBD/control, 90% CI) for AUC<sub>inf</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> with CBD co-administration was 1.09 (0.89, 1.32) and 1.08 (0.85, 1.37), respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Although the upper bound of bioequivalence was not met, the mean estimates of AUC and C<sub>max</sub> ratios were generally small and unlikely to be of clinical significance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"199-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c5/6e/mca-0005-0199.PMC9710314.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

简介:大麻二酚(CBD)是一种广泛使用的非精神活性大麻素,可作为非处方补充剂,医用大麻的成分,以及儿童癫痫的处方治疗。体外研究表明,CBD可能抑制许多药物代谢酶,包括羧酸酯酶1 (CES1)。本研究的目的是评价CBD对CES1底物哌醋甲酯(MPH)处置的影响。方法:在一项随机、安慰剂对照、交叉研究中,12名受试者摄入750 mg CBD溶液,或者每天两次服用安慰剂溶液,持续3天,随后服用额外的CBD剂量(或安慰剂)和单剂量10 mg MPH,并完成连续血液采样进行药代动力学分析。采用液相色谱-串联质谱法测定MPH和CBD浓度。结果:CBD组和安慰剂组的Cmax(平均±CV)分别为13.5±43.7% ng/mL和12.2±36.4% ng/mL。CBD组和安慰剂组AUCinf (ng/mL*h)分别为70.7±32.5%和63.6±25.4%。CBD AUC0-8h(平均±CV)为1542.2±32% ng/mL*h, Cmax为389.2±39% ng/mL。与MPH相比,CBD联合给药的AUCinf和Cmax的几何平均比值(CBD/对照,90% CI)分别为1.09(0.89,1.32)和1.08(0.85,1.37)。讨论/结论:虽然未达到生物等效性的上限,但AUC和Cmax比值的平均估价值通常较小,不太可能具有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Influence of Cannabidiol on the Pharmacokinetics of Methylphenidate in Healthy Subjects.

The Influence of Cannabidiol on the Pharmacokinetics of Methylphenidate in Healthy Subjects.

The Influence of Cannabidiol on the Pharmacokinetics of Methylphenidate in Healthy Subjects.

The Influence of Cannabidiol on the Pharmacokinetics of Methylphenidate in Healthy Subjects.

Introduction: Cannabidiol (CBD) is a widely utilized nonpsychoactive cannabinoid available as an over-the-counter supplement, a component of medical cannabis, and a prescriptive treatment of childhood epilepsies. In vitro studies suggest CBD may inhibit a number of drug-metabolizing enzymes, including carboxylesterase 1 (CES1). The aim of this study was to evaluate effect of CBD on the disposition of the CES1 substrate methylphenidate (MPH).

Methods: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 12 subjects ingested 750 mg of CBD solution, or alternatively, a placebo solution twice daily for a 3-day run-in period followed by an additional CBD dose (or placebo) and a single 10 mg dose of MPH and completed serial blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analysis. MPH and CBD concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.

Results: The Cmax (mean ± CV) for the CBD group and placebo group was 13.5 ± 43.7% ng/mL and 12.2 ± 36.4% ng/mL, respectively. AUCinf (ng/mL*h) for the CBD group and placebo group was 70.7 ± 32.5% and 63.6 ± 25.4%, respectively. The CBD AUC0-8h (mean ± CV) was 1,542.2 ± 32% ng/mL*h, and Cmax was 389.2 ± 39% ng/mL. When compared to MPH only, the geometric mean ratio (CBD/control, 90% CI) for AUCinf and Cmax with CBD co-administration was 1.09 (0.89, 1.32) and 1.08 (0.85, 1.37), respectively.

Discussion/conclusion: Although the upper bound of bioequivalence was not met, the mean estimates of AUC and Cmax ratios were generally small and unlikely to be of clinical significance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信