两个人比一个人好吗?使用达芬奇®双控制台机器人对结直肠手术效果的回顾性研究。

Kansas Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-28 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17161/kjm.vol15.18278
Dyllan Landry, Karson R Quinn, Stephen D Helmer, Noel C Sanchez
{"title":"两个人比一个人好吗?使用达芬奇®双控制台机器人对结直肠手术效果的回顾性研究。","authors":"Dyllan Landry,&nbsp;Karson R Quinn,&nbsp;Stephen D Helmer,&nbsp;Noel C Sanchez","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol15.18278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The da Vinci<sup>®</sup> surgical system has become standard in many specialties. The dual-console system has increased console time for residents during their training. This study evaluated patient outcomes using the single- versus dual-console system in resident training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-control study was conducted of patients who underwent various colorectal surgeries using either the single- or dual-console da Vinci<sup>®</sup> system. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients (54.2%) utilized the single-console and 60 (45.8%) utilized the dual-console. There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics, procedures performed, conversion to open, ICU admissions, total length of stay, need for blood transfusion, adequacy of surgical margin, number of lymph nodes harvested, anastomotic leak, discharge disposition, or readmission, wound infection, or need for reoperation within 30 days. There was a nonsignificant decrease in operative time with the dual-console system (200.6 vs. 220.2 minutes, p = 0.111).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While this study showed no statistically significant differences between patient outcomes utilizing the single- versus dual-consoles, it showed that it is safe for use in training, and that more research is needed in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":17991,"journal":{"name":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"418-421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/29/15-418.PMC9710501.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Two Better Than One? A Retrospective Study on Colorectal Surgery Outcomes Using the Da Vinci<sup>®</sup> Dual-Console Robot.\",\"authors\":\"Dyllan Landry,&nbsp;Karson R Quinn,&nbsp;Stephen D Helmer,&nbsp;Noel C Sanchez\",\"doi\":\"10.17161/kjm.vol15.18278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The da Vinci<sup>®</sup> surgical system has become standard in many specialties. The dual-console system has increased console time for residents during their training. This study evaluated patient outcomes using the single- versus dual-console system in resident training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-control study was conducted of patients who underwent various colorectal surgeries using either the single- or dual-console da Vinci<sup>®</sup> system. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients (54.2%) utilized the single-console and 60 (45.8%) utilized the dual-console. There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics, procedures performed, conversion to open, ICU admissions, total length of stay, need for blood transfusion, adequacy of surgical margin, number of lymph nodes harvested, anastomotic leak, discharge disposition, or readmission, wound infection, or need for reoperation within 30 days. There was a nonsignificant decrease in operative time with the dual-console system (200.6 vs. 220.2 minutes, p = 0.111).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While this study showed no statistically significant differences between patient outcomes utilizing the single- versus dual-consoles, it showed that it is safe for use in training, and that more research is needed in this area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kansas Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"418-421\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/29/15-418.PMC9710501.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kansas Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.18278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.18278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:达芬奇®手术系统已成为许多专业的标准。双控制台系统增加了住院医生在训练期间的控制台时间。本研究评估了住院医师培训中使用单控制台与双控制台系统的患者结果。方法:回顾性病例对照研究采用单控制台或双控制台达芬奇®系统进行各种结肠直肠手术的患者。收集患者统计资料、合并症和结果。结果:单控制台71例(54.2%),双控制台60例(45.8%)。在患者人口统计学、所做手术、转为开放、ICU入院、总住院时间、输血需求、手术切缘充足性、淋巴结数量、吻合口漏、出院处置、再入院、伤口感染或30天内再次手术需求方面无统计学显著差异。双控制台系统的手术时间无显著减少(200.6 vs. 220.2分钟,p = 0.111)。结论:虽然这项研究显示使用单控制台和双控制台的患者结果没有统计学上的显著差异,但它表明在训练中使用它是安全的,并且需要在该领域进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Two Better Than One? A Retrospective Study on Colorectal Surgery Outcomes Using the Da Vinci® Dual-Console Robot.

Introduction: The da Vinci® surgical system has become standard in many specialties. The dual-console system has increased console time for residents during their training. This study evaluated patient outcomes using the single- versus dual-console system in resident training.

Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted of patients who underwent various colorectal surgeries using either the single- or dual-console da Vinci® system. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were collected.

Results: Seventy-one patients (54.2%) utilized the single-console and 60 (45.8%) utilized the dual-console. There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics, procedures performed, conversion to open, ICU admissions, total length of stay, need for blood transfusion, adequacy of surgical margin, number of lymph nodes harvested, anastomotic leak, discharge disposition, or readmission, wound infection, or need for reoperation within 30 days. There was a nonsignificant decrease in operative time with the dual-console system (200.6 vs. 220.2 minutes, p = 0.111).

Conclusions: While this study showed no statistically significant differences between patient outcomes utilizing the single- versus dual-consoles, it showed that it is safe for use in training, and that more research is needed in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信