牙科胶粘剂系统的分类综述:从IV代到通用型。

Annali di stomatologia Pub Date : 2017-07-03 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001
Eshrak Sofan, Afrah Sofan, Gaspare Palaia, Gianluca Tenore, Umberto Romeo, Guido Migliau
{"title":"牙科胶粘剂系统的分类综述:从IV代到通用型。","authors":"Eshrak Sofan,&nbsp;Afrah Sofan,&nbsp;Gaspare Palaia,&nbsp;Gianluca Tenore,&nbsp;Umberto Romeo,&nbsp;Guido Migliau","doi":"10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adhesive dentistry has undergone great progress in the last decades. In light of minimal-invasive dentistry, this new approach promotes a more conservative cavity design, which relies on the effectiveness of current enamel-dentine adhesives. Adhesive dentistry began in 1955 by Buonocore on the benefits of acid etching. With changing technologies, dental adhesives have evolved from no-etch to total-etch (4<sup>th</sup> and 5<sup>th</sup> generation) to self-etch (6<sup>th</sup>, 7<sup>th</sup> and 8<sup>th</sup> generation) systems. Currently, bonding to dental substrates is based on three different strategies: 1) etch-and-rinse, 2) self-etch and 3) resin-modified glass-ionomer approach as possessing the unique properties of self-adherence to the tooth tissue. More recently, a new family of dentin adhesives has been introduced (universal or multi-mode adhesives), which may be used either as etch-and-rinse or as self-etch adhesives. The purpose of this article is to review the literature on the current knowledge for each adhesive system according to their classification that have been advocated by many authorities in most operative/restorative procedures. As noted by several valuable studies that have contributed to understanding of bonding to various substrates helps clinicians to choose the appropriate dentin bonding agents for optimal clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":78041,"journal":{"name":"Annali di stomatologia","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001","citationCount":"297","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type.\",\"authors\":\"Eshrak Sofan,&nbsp;Afrah Sofan,&nbsp;Gaspare Palaia,&nbsp;Gianluca Tenore,&nbsp;Umberto Romeo,&nbsp;Guido Migliau\",\"doi\":\"10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adhesive dentistry has undergone great progress in the last decades. In light of minimal-invasive dentistry, this new approach promotes a more conservative cavity design, which relies on the effectiveness of current enamel-dentine adhesives. Adhesive dentistry began in 1955 by Buonocore on the benefits of acid etching. With changing technologies, dental adhesives have evolved from no-etch to total-etch (4<sup>th</sup> and 5<sup>th</sup> generation) to self-etch (6<sup>th</sup>, 7<sup>th</sup> and 8<sup>th</sup> generation) systems. Currently, bonding to dental substrates is based on three different strategies: 1) etch-and-rinse, 2) self-etch and 3) resin-modified glass-ionomer approach as possessing the unique properties of self-adherence to the tooth tissue. More recently, a new family of dentin adhesives has been introduced (universal or multi-mode adhesives), which may be used either as etch-and-rinse or as self-etch adhesives. The purpose of this article is to review the literature on the current knowledge for each adhesive system according to their classification that have been advocated by many authorities in most operative/restorative procedures. As noted by several valuable studies that have contributed to understanding of bonding to various substrates helps clinicians to choose the appropriate dentin bonding agents for optimal clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":78041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali di stomatologia\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001\",\"citationCount\":\"297\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali di stomatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali di stomatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 297

摘要

粘合剂牙科在过去的几十年里取得了很大的进步。鉴于微创牙科,这种新方法促进了更保守的腔设计,这依赖于当前牙釉质-牙本质粘合剂的有效性。粘接剂牙科始于1955年由博诺科对酸蚀刻的好处。随着技术的不断变化,牙科胶粘剂已经从无蚀刻到全蚀刻(第四代和第五代)再到自蚀刻(第六代、第七代和第八代)系统。目前,与牙齿基质的结合主要基于三种不同的策略:1)蚀刻-冲洗,2)自蚀刻和3)树脂改性玻璃离聚体方法,因为它们具有与牙齿组织自粘附的独特特性。最近,一种新的牙本质粘接剂被引入(通用或多模式粘接剂),它可以用作蚀刻和冲洗或自蚀刻粘接剂。本文的目的是根据许多权威机构在大多数手术/修复过程中所提倡的分类,对每种粘接剂系统的现有知识进行文献综述。正如几项有价值的研究所指出的那样,这些研究有助于了解与各种底物的结合,帮助临床医生选择合适的牙本质结合剂,以获得最佳的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type.

Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type.

Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type.

Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type.

Adhesive dentistry has undergone great progress in the last decades. In light of minimal-invasive dentistry, this new approach promotes a more conservative cavity design, which relies on the effectiveness of current enamel-dentine adhesives. Adhesive dentistry began in 1955 by Buonocore on the benefits of acid etching. With changing technologies, dental adhesives have evolved from no-etch to total-etch (4th and 5th generation) to self-etch (6th, 7th and 8th generation) systems. Currently, bonding to dental substrates is based on three different strategies: 1) etch-and-rinse, 2) self-etch and 3) resin-modified glass-ionomer approach as possessing the unique properties of self-adherence to the tooth tissue. More recently, a new family of dentin adhesives has been introduced (universal or multi-mode adhesives), which may be used either as etch-and-rinse or as self-etch adhesives. The purpose of this article is to review the literature on the current knowledge for each adhesive system according to their classification that have been advocated by many authorities in most operative/restorative procedures. As noted by several valuable studies that have contributed to understanding of bonding to various substrates helps clinicians to choose the appropriate dentin bonding agents for optimal clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信