降钙素原或c反应蛋白对胎膜早破(PROM)患者亚临床宫内感染的预测价值

Kemin Li, Haiyan Yu, Xiaodong Wang, Xinghui Liu
{"title":"降钙素原或c反应蛋白对胎膜早破(PROM)患者亚临床宫内感染的预测价值","authors":"Kemin Li,&nbsp;Haiyan Yu,&nbsp;Xiaodong Wang,&nbsp;Xinghui Liu","doi":"10.11138/jpm/2016.10.3.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>to evaluate the diagnostic value of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) for the prediction of subclinical intrauterine infection in patients with premature rupture of membranes (PROM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a retrospective analysis was performed based on patients with PROM admitted into our hospital between January 2011 and January 2016. Using the pathological diagnosis of placenta as the gold standard, the sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values of PCT and CRP for the diagnosis of subclinical intrauterine infection at different gestational weeks were analyzed. Further, the diagnostic accuracies were compared according to their receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>276 cases were included. The area under the ROC curve of CRP is 0.632, and it is significantly better than PCT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CRP are 0.686, 0.958, 0.501, and 0.765, which are all better than those of PCT. The group analysis according to different gestational weeks demonstrated that for the group of 28-33+6 weeks pregnant women, the area under the ROC curve of CRP and PCT is 0.869, and 0.787. The both test have satisfactory accuracy. But the sensitivity and specificity of PCT is 0.830, and 0.950, respectively. That are significantly better than CRP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>both PCT and CRP have good application potential for the diagnostic prediction of subclinical intrauterine infection in <34 gestational weeks pregnant women with PROM, and PCT is more applicable to 28-33+6 gestational weeks pregnant women with PROM.</p>","PeriodicalId":89592,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prenatal medicine","volume":"10 3-4","pages":"23-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11138/jpm/2016.10.3.023","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive value of procalcitonin or c-reactive protein for subclinical intrauterine infection in patients with premature rupture of membranes (PROM).\",\"authors\":\"Kemin Li,&nbsp;Haiyan Yu,&nbsp;Xiaodong Wang,&nbsp;Xinghui Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.11138/jpm/2016.10.3.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>to evaluate the diagnostic value of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) for the prediction of subclinical intrauterine infection in patients with premature rupture of membranes (PROM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a retrospective analysis was performed based on patients with PROM admitted into our hospital between January 2011 and January 2016. Using the pathological diagnosis of placenta as the gold standard, the sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values of PCT and CRP for the diagnosis of subclinical intrauterine infection at different gestational weeks were analyzed. Further, the diagnostic accuracies were compared according to their receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>276 cases were included. The area under the ROC curve of CRP is 0.632, and it is significantly better than PCT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CRP are 0.686, 0.958, 0.501, and 0.765, which are all better than those of PCT. The group analysis according to different gestational weeks demonstrated that for the group of 28-33+6 weeks pregnant women, the area under the ROC curve of CRP and PCT is 0.869, and 0.787. The both test have satisfactory accuracy. But the sensitivity and specificity of PCT is 0.830, and 0.950, respectively. That are significantly better than CRP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>both PCT and CRP have good application potential for the diagnostic prediction of subclinical intrauterine infection in <34 gestational weeks pregnant women with PROM, and PCT is more applicable to 28-33+6 gestational weeks pregnant women with PROM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of prenatal medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 3-4\",\"pages\":\"23-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11138/jpm/2016.10.3.023\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of prenatal medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11138/jpm/2016.10.3.023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prenatal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/jpm/2016.10.3.023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

前言:探讨降钙素原(PCT)和c反应蛋白(CRP)对预测胎膜早破(PROM)患者亚临床宫内感染的诊断价值。方法:对我院2011年1月至2016年1月收治的早膜PROM患者进行回顾性分析。以胎盘病理诊断为金标准,分析不同孕周PCT、CRP诊断亚临床宫内感染的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值。根据受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较诊断准确率。结果:共纳入276例。CRP的ROC曲线下面积为0.632,明显优于PCT, CRP的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为0.686、0.958、0.501、0.765,均优于PCT,按不同孕周分组分析,28-33+6周孕妇CRP与PCT的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.869、0.787。两种检测方法均具有令人满意的准确性。而PCT的敏感性为0.830,特异性为0.950。明显优于CRP。结论:PCT与CRP在诊断预测子宫亚临床感染方面均有较好的应用潜力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predictive value of procalcitonin or c-reactive protein for subclinical intrauterine infection in patients with premature rupture of membranes (PROM).

Predictive value of procalcitonin or c-reactive protein for subclinical intrauterine infection in patients with premature rupture of membranes (PROM).

Predictive value of procalcitonin or c-reactive protein for subclinical intrauterine infection in patients with premature rupture of membranes (PROM).

Introduction: to evaluate the diagnostic value of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) for the prediction of subclinical intrauterine infection in patients with premature rupture of membranes (PROM).

Methods: a retrospective analysis was performed based on patients with PROM admitted into our hospital between January 2011 and January 2016. Using the pathological diagnosis of placenta as the gold standard, the sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values of PCT and CRP for the diagnosis of subclinical intrauterine infection at different gestational weeks were analyzed. Further, the diagnostic accuracies were compared according to their receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results: 276 cases were included. The area under the ROC curve of CRP is 0.632, and it is significantly better than PCT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CRP are 0.686, 0.958, 0.501, and 0.765, which are all better than those of PCT. The group analysis according to different gestational weeks demonstrated that for the group of 28-33+6 weeks pregnant women, the area under the ROC curve of CRP and PCT is 0.869, and 0.787. The both test have satisfactory accuracy. But the sensitivity and specificity of PCT is 0.830, and 0.950, respectively. That are significantly better than CRP.

Conclusion: both PCT and CRP have good application potential for the diagnostic prediction of subclinical intrauterine infection in <34 gestational weeks pregnant women with PROM, and PCT is more applicable to 28-33+6 gestational weeks pregnant women with PROM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信