意大利现实生活卒中后痉挛调查:A型肉毒杆菌毒素痉挛管理的未满足需求。

Q2 Medicine
A Picelli, A Baricich, C Cisari, Stefano Paolucci, Nicola Smania, Giorgio Sandrini
{"title":"意大利现实生活卒中后痉挛调查:A型肉毒杆菌毒素痉挛管理的未满足需求。","authors":"A Picelli,&nbsp;A Baricich,&nbsp;C Cisari,&nbsp;Stefano Paolucci,&nbsp;Nicola Smania,&nbsp;Giorgio Sandrini","doi":"10.11138/fneur/2017.32.2.089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present national survey seeking to identify unmet needs in the management of spasticity with botulinum toxin type A focused on the use of OnabotulinumoxinA, since this is the brand with the widest range of licensed indications in Italy. Physicians from twenty-four Italian neurorehabilitation units compiled a questionnaire about \"real-life\" post-stroke spasticity management. OnabotulinumtoxinA was reported to be used in the following average doses: upper limb 316.7 ± 79.1 units; lower limb 327.8 ± 152.3; upper and lower limb 543.7 ± 123.7 units. Of the physicians surveyed, 37.5% felt that increasing the frequency of OnabotulinumtoxinA injection would improve its efficacy; 70.8% use electrical stimulation/electromyography guidance (one fourth of injections with no instrumental guidance). Instrumental evaluation was used by 41.7% of the physicians. The participants expressed the view that early identification of post-stroke spasticity would be facilitated by the availability of a post-stroke checklist, and that this should be used by physiotherapists (91.7%), physiatrists (58.3%), family doctors (50%), stroke unit physicians (25%), patients and caregivers (79.2%). According to our findings, the management of poststroke spasticity has several unmet needs that, were they addressed, might improve these patients' clinical outcomes and quality of life. These needs concern patient follow-up, where a clearly defined pathway is lacking; furthermore, there is a need to use maximum doses per treatment and to ensure early intervention on post-stroke spasticity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12560,"journal":{"name":"Functional neurology","volume":"32 2","pages":"89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5507158/pdf/89-96.pdf","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Italian real-life post-stroke spasticity survey: unmet needs in the management of spasticity with botulinum toxin type A.\",\"authors\":\"A Picelli,&nbsp;A Baricich,&nbsp;C Cisari,&nbsp;Stefano Paolucci,&nbsp;Nicola Smania,&nbsp;Giorgio Sandrini\",\"doi\":\"10.11138/fneur/2017.32.2.089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present national survey seeking to identify unmet needs in the management of spasticity with botulinum toxin type A focused on the use of OnabotulinumoxinA, since this is the brand with the widest range of licensed indications in Italy. Physicians from twenty-four Italian neurorehabilitation units compiled a questionnaire about \\\"real-life\\\" post-stroke spasticity management. OnabotulinumtoxinA was reported to be used in the following average doses: upper limb 316.7 ± 79.1 units; lower limb 327.8 ± 152.3; upper and lower limb 543.7 ± 123.7 units. Of the physicians surveyed, 37.5% felt that increasing the frequency of OnabotulinumtoxinA injection would improve its efficacy; 70.8% use electrical stimulation/electromyography guidance (one fourth of injections with no instrumental guidance). Instrumental evaluation was used by 41.7% of the physicians. The participants expressed the view that early identification of post-stroke spasticity would be facilitated by the availability of a post-stroke checklist, and that this should be used by physiotherapists (91.7%), physiatrists (58.3%), family doctors (50%), stroke unit physicians (25%), patients and caregivers (79.2%). According to our findings, the management of poststroke spasticity has several unmet needs that, were they addressed, might improve these patients' clinical outcomes and quality of life. These needs concern patient follow-up, where a clearly defined pathway is lacking; furthermore, there is a need to use maximum doses per treatment and to ensure early intervention on post-stroke spasticity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Functional neurology\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"89-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5507158/pdf/89-96.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Functional neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11138/fneur/2017.32.2.089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functional neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/fneur/2017.32.2.089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

目前的全国调查旨在确定A型肉毒杆菌毒素痉挛管理中未满足的需求,重点关注OnabotulinumoxinA的使用,因为这是意大利许可适应症范围最广的品牌。来自24个意大利神经康复单位的医生编制了一份关于“现实生活”中风后痉挛管理的问卷。据报道,单肉毒杆菌毒素的平均使用剂量如下:上肢316.7±79.1单位;下肢327.8±152.3;上肢和下肢543.7±123.7个单位。37.5%的受访医师认为增加注射单肉毒杆菌毒素的频率可以提高其疗效;70.8%采用电刺激/肌电图指导(四分之一的注射没有器械指导)。41.7%的医生使用仪器评估。参与者表示,卒中后痉挛的早期识别将通过卒中后检查表的可用性来促进,并且该检查表应由物理治疗师(91.7%),物理医生(58.3%),家庭医生(50%),卒中单位医生(25%),患者和护理人员(79.2%)使用。根据我们的研究结果,脑卒中后痉挛的管理有几个未满足的需求,如果这些需求得到解决,可能会改善这些患者的临床结果和生活质量。这些需求涉及缺乏明确定义途径的患者随访;此外,有必要在每次治疗时使用最大剂量,并确保对卒中后痉挛进行早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Italian real-life post-stroke spasticity survey: unmet needs in the management of spasticity with botulinum toxin type A.

The Italian real-life post-stroke spasticity survey: unmet needs in the management of spasticity with botulinum toxin type A.

The Italian real-life post-stroke spasticity survey: unmet needs in the management of spasticity with botulinum toxin type A.

The Italian real-life post-stroke spasticity survey: unmet needs in the management of spasticity with botulinum toxin type A.

The present national survey seeking to identify unmet needs in the management of spasticity with botulinum toxin type A focused on the use of OnabotulinumoxinA, since this is the brand with the widest range of licensed indications in Italy. Physicians from twenty-four Italian neurorehabilitation units compiled a questionnaire about "real-life" post-stroke spasticity management. OnabotulinumtoxinA was reported to be used in the following average doses: upper limb 316.7 ± 79.1 units; lower limb 327.8 ± 152.3; upper and lower limb 543.7 ± 123.7 units. Of the physicians surveyed, 37.5% felt that increasing the frequency of OnabotulinumtoxinA injection would improve its efficacy; 70.8% use electrical stimulation/electromyography guidance (one fourth of injections with no instrumental guidance). Instrumental evaluation was used by 41.7% of the physicians. The participants expressed the view that early identification of post-stroke spasticity would be facilitated by the availability of a post-stroke checklist, and that this should be used by physiotherapists (91.7%), physiatrists (58.3%), family doctors (50%), stroke unit physicians (25%), patients and caregivers (79.2%). According to our findings, the management of poststroke spasticity has several unmet needs that, were they addressed, might improve these patients' clinical outcomes and quality of life. These needs concern patient follow-up, where a clearly defined pathway is lacking; furthermore, there is a need to use maximum doses per treatment and to ensure early intervention on post-stroke spasticity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Functional neurology
Functional neurology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信