漂白牙釉质抗氧化活性与结合强度的关系。

Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2016-08-23 eCollection Date: 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1080/23337931.2016.1222283
Hellen Caroliny De Carvalho, Ricardo Danil Guiraldo, Regina Célia Poli-Frederico, Sandra Mara Maciel, Sandra Kiss Moura, Murilo Baena Lopes, Sandrine Bittencourt Berger
{"title":"漂白牙釉质抗氧化活性与结合强度的关系。","authors":"Hellen Caroliny De Carvalho,&nbsp;Ricardo Danil Guiraldo,&nbsp;Regina Célia Poli-Frederico,&nbsp;Sandra Mara Maciel,&nbsp;Sandra Kiss Moura,&nbsp;Murilo Baena Lopes,&nbsp;Sandrine Bittencourt Berger","doi":"10.1080/23337931.2016.1222283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study used the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate (DPPH) method to evaluate the percentage of antioxidant activity (%AA) of green tea (GT) and sodium ascorbate (SA) gel in three concentrations (10%, 20% and 30%), and the influence of these concentrations on the microshear bond strength (μ-SBT) values of bleached enamel, using 10% carbamide peroxide (CP). <b>Materials and methods:</b> Eighty intact third molars were selected to perform the μ-SBT test, and were randomly divided into eight experimental groups: G1: positive control - no treatment; G2: negative control - bleached with CP; G3: PC +10% GT; G4: PC +20% GT; G5: PC +30% GT; G6: PC +10% SA; G7: PC +20% SA and G8: PC +30% SA. After applying the treatments, adhesive procedures were performed using Single Bond 2 and Filtek Z350XT. After 24 h, the samples were tested in a universal testing machine until fracture. The %AA was assessed in triplicate by DDPH method using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer. <b>Results:</b> In the μ-SBT, ANOVA revealed no significant difference between the antioxidants evaluated (<i>p</i> = .625), but did reveal significant effects of the concentrations studied (<i>p</i> = .007). A negative correlation was observed between μ-SBT and solution concentrations. The values of %AA were from 90.58 to 96.75. <b>Conclusions:</b> The reverse results occurred in μ-SBT values, only when the antioxidants were used in a 10% concentration and, %AA did not influence μ-SBT.</p>","PeriodicalId":6997,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":"2 1","pages":"102-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337931.2016.1222283","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between antioxidant activity and bonding strength on bleached enamel.\",\"authors\":\"Hellen Caroliny De Carvalho,&nbsp;Ricardo Danil Guiraldo,&nbsp;Regina Célia Poli-Frederico,&nbsp;Sandra Mara Maciel,&nbsp;Sandra Kiss Moura,&nbsp;Murilo Baena Lopes,&nbsp;Sandrine Bittencourt Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23337931.2016.1222283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study used the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate (DPPH) method to evaluate the percentage of antioxidant activity (%AA) of green tea (GT) and sodium ascorbate (SA) gel in three concentrations (10%, 20% and 30%), and the influence of these concentrations on the microshear bond strength (μ-SBT) values of bleached enamel, using 10% carbamide peroxide (CP). <b>Materials and methods:</b> Eighty intact third molars were selected to perform the μ-SBT test, and were randomly divided into eight experimental groups: G1: positive control - no treatment; G2: negative control - bleached with CP; G3: PC +10% GT; G4: PC +20% GT; G5: PC +30% GT; G6: PC +10% SA; G7: PC +20% SA and G8: PC +30% SA. After applying the treatments, adhesive procedures were performed using Single Bond 2 and Filtek Z350XT. After 24 h, the samples were tested in a universal testing machine until fracture. The %AA was assessed in triplicate by DDPH method using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer. <b>Results:</b> In the μ-SBT, ANOVA revealed no significant difference between the antioxidants evaluated (<i>p</i> = .625), but did reveal significant effects of the concentrations studied (<i>p</i> = .007). A negative correlation was observed between μ-SBT and solution concentrations. The values of %AA were from 90.58 to 96.75. <b>Conclusions:</b> The reverse results occurred in μ-SBT values, only when the antioxidants were used in a 10% concentration and, %AA did not influence μ-SBT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"102-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337931.2016.1222283\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2016.1222283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2016.1222283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

目的:采用2,2-二苯基-1-苦酰基-水合肼(DPPH)法测定绿茶(GT)和抗坏血酸钠(SA)凝胶在10%、20%和30%三种浓度下的抗氧化活性百分比(%AA),以及这些浓度对10%过氧化脲(CP)漂白牙釉质微剪切强度(μ-SBT)值的影响。材料与方法:选择80颗完整第三磨牙进行μ-SBT测试,随机分为8个实验组:G1组:阳性对照组-未处理组;G2:阴性对照——用CP漂白;G3: PC +10% gt;G4: PC +20% gt;G5: PC +30% gt;G6: PC +10% sa;G7: PC +20% SA, G8: PC +30% SA。应用处理后,使用Single Bond 2和Filtek Z350XT进行粘合操作。24h后,试样在万能试验机上进行测试,直至断裂。采用紫外-可见分光光度计,用DDPH法测定了三份样品中的%AA。结果:在μ-SBT中,方差分析显示各抗氧化剂之间无显著差异(p = .625),但研究浓度的确有显著影响(p = .007)。μ-SBT与溶液浓度呈负相关。%AA值为90.58 ~ 96.75。结论:当抗氧化剂浓度为10%时,μ-SBT值出现相反的结果,而%AA对μ-SBT没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Correlation between antioxidant activity and bonding strength on bleached enamel.

Correlation between antioxidant activity and bonding strength on bleached enamel.

Correlation between antioxidant activity and bonding strength on bleached enamel.

Objective: This study used the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate (DPPH) method to evaluate the percentage of antioxidant activity (%AA) of green tea (GT) and sodium ascorbate (SA) gel in three concentrations (10%, 20% and 30%), and the influence of these concentrations on the microshear bond strength (μ-SBT) values of bleached enamel, using 10% carbamide peroxide (CP). Materials and methods: Eighty intact third molars were selected to perform the μ-SBT test, and were randomly divided into eight experimental groups: G1: positive control - no treatment; G2: negative control - bleached with CP; G3: PC +10% GT; G4: PC +20% GT; G5: PC +30% GT; G6: PC +10% SA; G7: PC +20% SA and G8: PC +30% SA. After applying the treatments, adhesive procedures were performed using Single Bond 2 and Filtek Z350XT. After 24 h, the samples were tested in a universal testing machine until fracture. The %AA was assessed in triplicate by DDPH method using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer. Results: In the μ-SBT, ANOVA revealed no significant difference between the antioxidants evaluated (p = .625), but did reveal significant effects of the concentrations studied (p = .007). A negative correlation was observed between μ-SBT and solution concentrations. The values of %AA were from 90.58 to 96.75. Conclusions: The reverse results occurred in μ-SBT values, only when the antioxidants were used in a 10% concentration and, %AA did not influence μ-SBT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信