粪肠球菌明胶酶产生对不同根管冲洗液对牙本质粘附的影响。

Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2016-11-15 eCollection Date: 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1080/23337931.2016.1256212
Mehmet Burak Guneser, Ayce Unverdi Eldeniz
{"title":"粪肠球菌明胶酶产生对不同根管冲洗液对牙本质粘附的影响。","authors":"Mehmet Burak Guneser,&nbsp;Ayce Unverdi Eldeniz","doi":"10.1080/23337931.2016.1256212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the gelatinase production ability of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> provides any advantage on adhesion of this bacterium to dentin treated with various irrigants and their combinations. <b>Materials and methods:</b> Standardized dentin discs were randomly divided into five groups (<i>n</i> = 20): group 1: 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), group 2: 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), group 3: NaOCl + Saline + CHX, group 4: NaOCl + EDTA + NaOCl, group 5: QMix. After incubation of dentin discs with irrigants, each group was divided into two subgroups (<i>n</i> = 10) according to the bacterial strains used; a gelatinase-producing and a gelatinase-deficient strain of <i>E. faecalis.</i> After incubation of the discs with the bacterial suspensions aerobically for 48 h, XTT assay was conducted for bacterial adherence evaluation. Data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's HSD tests (<i>p</i> = .05). <b>Results:</b> Gelatinase-producing <i>E. faecalis</i> adhered to dentin was significantly more than gelatinase-deficient <i>E. faecalis</i> in all test groups (<i>p</i> < .05). Adherence to CHX-treated dentin was lower than to the surfaces treated with other irrigants, alone or in combination (<i>p</i> < .05). These differences were significant except for comparisons with QMix for gelatinase-producing bacteria (<i>p</i> < .05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Gelatinase production of <i>E. faecalis</i> may be an important factor for bacterial adhesion. The addition of CHX to the irrigation regimen resulted in fewer adhered bacteria to dentin. QMix was not as effective as CHX in terms of bacterial adhesion prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":6997,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":"2 1","pages":"144-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337931.2016.1256212","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of gelatinase production of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> on adhesion to dentin after irrigation with various endodontic irrigants.\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Burak Guneser,&nbsp;Ayce Unverdi Eldeniz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23337931.2016.1256212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the gelatinase production ability of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> provides any advantage on adhesion of this bacterium to dentin treated with various irrigants and their combinations. <b>Materials and methods:</b> Standardized dentin discs were randomly divided into five groups (<i>n</i> = 20): group 1: 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), group 2: 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), group 3: NaOCl + Saline + CHX, group 4: NaOCl + EDTA + NaOCl, group 5: QMix. After incubation of dentin discs with irrigants, each group was divided into two subgroups (<i>n</i> = 10) according to the bacterial strains used; a gelatinase-producing and a gelatinase-deficient strain of <i>E. faecalis.</i> After incubation of the discs with the bacterial suspensions aerobically for 48 h, XTT assay was conducted for bacterial adherence evaluation. Data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's HSD tests (<i>p</i> = .05). <b>Results:</b> Gelatinase-producing <i>E. faecalis</i> adhered to dentin was significantly more than gelatinase-deficient <i>E. faecalis</i> in all test groups (<i>p</i> < .05). Adherence to CHX-treated dentin was lower than to the surfaces treated with other irrigants, alone or in combination (<i>p</i> < .05). These differences were significant except for comparisons with QMix for gelatinase-producing bacteria (<i>p</i> < .05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Gelatinase production of <i>E. faecalis</i> may be an important factor for bacterial adhesion. The addition of CHX to the irrigation regimen resulted in fewer adhered bacteria to dentin. QMix was not as effective as CHX in terms of bacterial adhesion prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"144-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337931.2016.1256212\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2016.1256212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2016.1256212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估粪肠球菌生产明胶酶的能力是否对该细菌在不同冲洗剂及其组合处理后对牙本质的粘附有任何优势。材料与方法:将标准牙本质盘随机分为5组(n = 20): 1组:2.5%次氯酸钠(NaOCl), 2组:2%氯己定(CHX), 3组:NaOCl +生理盐水+ CHX, 4组:NaOCl + EDTA + NaOCl, 5组:QMix。牙本质盘用冲洗液孵育后,每组按所用菌种分为两亚组(n = 10);一种产生明胶酶的菌株和一种缺乏明胶酶的菌株。菌悬液与菌盘有氧孵育48 h后,采用XTT法评价细菌粘附性。数据采用方差分析和Tukey’s HSD检验进行统计学分析(p = 0.05)。结果:各试验组产生明胶酶的粪肠球菌粘附在牙本质上的数量明显多于缺乏明胶酶的粪肠球菌(p < 0.05)。chx处理的牙本质表面粘附率低于单独或联合使用其他冲洗液处理的牙本质表面粘附率(p < 0.05)。除明胶酶产生菌与QMix比较外,其余差异均显著(p < 0.05)。结论:粪肠球菌明胶酶的产生可能是细菌粘附的重要因素。在灌养方案中添加CHX可减少牙本质上的粘附细菌。QMix对细菌粘附的预防效果不如CHX。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of gelatinase production of Enterococcus faecalis on adhesion to dentin after irrigation with various endodontic irrigants.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the gelatinase production ability of Enterococcus faecalis provides any advantage on adhesion of this bacterium to dentin treated with various irrigants and their combinations. Materials and methods: Standardized dentin discs were randomly divided into five groups (n = 20): group 1: 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), group 2: 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), group 3: NaOCl + Saline + CHX, group 4: NaOCl + EDTA + NaOCl, group 5: QMix. After incubation of dentin discs with irrigants, each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 10) according to the bacterial strains used; a gelatinase-producing and a gelatinase-deficient strain of E. faecalis. After incubation of the discs with the bacterial suspensions aerobically for 48 h, XTT assay was conducted for bacterial adherence evaluation. Data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's HSD tests (p = .05). Results: Gelatinase-producing E. faecalis adhered to dentin was significantly more than gelatinase-deficient E. faecalis in all test groups (p < .05). Adherence to CHX-treated dentin was lower than to the surfaces treated with other irrigants, alone or in combination (p < .05). These differences were significant except for comparisons with QMix for gelatinase-producing bacteria (p < .05). Conclusions: Gelatinase production of E. faecalis may be an important factor for bacterial adhesion. The addition of CHX to the irrigation regimen resulted in fewer adhered bacteria to dentin. QMix was not as effective as CHX in terms of bacterial adhesion prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信