通用水泥:双活化和化学活化。

Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2016-09-23 eCollection Date: 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1080/23337931.2016.1221314
Eliane de Lima, Ricardo Santos, Márcia Durão, Armiliana Nascimento, Rodivan Braz
{"title":"通用水泥:双活化和化学活化。","authors":"Eliane de Lima,&nbsp;Ricardo Santos,&nbsp;Márcia Durão,&nbsp;Armiliana Nascimento,&nbsp;Rodivan Braz","doi":"10.1080/23337931.2016.1221314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The aim of the present study was to assess the bond strength of universal cements cured either dually or chemically only. <b>Methods:</b> Three cements were assessed using different types of application: dual activated (DA) or chemically activated (CA). In total 80 dentin blocks were used, obtained through the enamel wear of the lingual and buccal surfaces of bovine incisors. Standard cone-shaped cavity preparations were created using diamond burs. Subsequently, indirect restoration blocks were designed with Filtek Z350 (3M ESPE) composite resin. The teeth were divided into two groups (DA and CA) and then subdivided into four subgroups (<i>n</i> = 10) prior to cementation with the respective products: Duo-Link (Bisco); RelyX Ultimate (3M ESPE); Nexus 3 (Kerr) and conventional RelyX ARC (3M ESPE) as the control. The cementation in the PA group was applied following the manufacturer's instructions. The CA group was cemented in a darkroom to avoid exposure to light. They were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and submitted to the push-out test. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's <i>post-hoc</i> test (<i>p</i> < .05). <b>Results:</b> The greatest bond strength results were obtained for photoactivated universal cements. <b>Conclusion:</b> Chemical activation is not sufficient to ensure acceptable bond strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":6997,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":"2 1","pages":"125-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337931.2016.1221314","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Universal cements: dual activated and chemically activated.\",\"authors\":\"Eliane de Lima,&nbsp;Ricardo Santos,&nbsp;Márcia Durão,&nbsp;Armiliana Nascimento,&nbsp;Rodivan Braz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23337931.2016.1221314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The aim of the present study was to assess the bond strength of universal cements cured either dually or chemically only. <b>Methods:</b> Three cements were assessed using different types of application: dual activated (DA) or chemically activated (CA). In total 80 dentin blocks were used, obtained through the enamel wear of the lingual and buccal surfaces of bovine incisors. Standard cone-shaped cavity preparations were created using diamond burs. Subsequently, indirect restoration blocks were designed with Filtek Z350 (3M ESPE) composite resin. The teeth were divided into two groups (DA and CA) and then subdivided into four subgroups (<i>n</i> = 10) prior to cementation with the respective products: Duo-Link (Bisco); RelyX Ultimate (3M ESPE); Nexus 3 (Kerr) and conventional RelyX ARC (3M ESPE) as the control. The cementation in the PA group was applied following the manufacturer's instructions. The CA group was cemented in a darkroom to avoid exposure to light. They were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and submitted to the push-out test. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's <i>post-hoc</i> test (<i>p</i> < .05). <b>Results:</b> The greatest bond strength results were obtained for photoactivated universal cements. <b>Conclusion:</b> Chemical activation is not sufficient to ensure acceptable bond strength.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"125-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337931.2016.1221314\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2016.1221314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2016.1221314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估双固化或化学固化万能水泥的粘结强度。方法:采用双活化(DA)或化学活化(CA)三种不同类型的应用评估水泥。共使用80个牙本质块,通过牛门牙舌面和颊面牙釉质磨损获得。使用金刚石毛刺制备标准锥形腔体。随后,采用Filtek Z350 (3M ESPE)复合树脂设计间接修复块体。将牙齿分为两组(DA和CA),然后再细分为四个亚组(n = 10),然后分别使用各自的产品进行粘接:Duo-Link (Bisco);RelyX Ultimate (3M ESPE);Nexus 3 (Kerr)和传统的RelyX ARC (3M ESPE)作为对照。按照制造商的说明应用PA组的骨水泥。CA组在暗室中胶合,以避免暴露在光线下。在37°C蒸馏水中保存24 h,并进行推出试验。数据分析采用双因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验(p < 0.05)。结果:光活化万能胶合剂的粘结强度最高。结论:化学活化不足以保证可接受的粘结强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Universal cements: dual activated and chemically activated.

Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess the bond strength of universal cements cured either dually or chemically only. Methods: Three cements were assessed using different types of application: dual activated (DA) or chemically activated (CA). In total 80 dentin blocks were used, obtained through the enamel wear of the lingual and buccal surfaces of bovine incisors. Standard cone-shaped cavity preparations were created using diamond burs. Subsequently, indirect restoration blocks were designed with Filtek Z350 (3M ESPE) composite resin. The teeth were divided into two groups (DA and CA) and then subdivided into four subgroups (n = 10) prior to cementation with the respective products: Duo-Link (Bisco); RelyX Ultimate (3M ESPE); Nexus 3 (Kerr) and conventional RelyX ARC (3M ESPE) as the control. The cementation in the PA group was applied following the manufacturer's instructions. The CA group was cemented in a darkroom to avoid exposure to light. They were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and submitted to the push-out test. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (p < .05). Results: The greatest bond strength results were obtained for photoactivated universal cements. Conclusion: Chemical activation is not sufficient to ensure acceptable bond strength.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信