出院后早期随访对心力衰竭或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者预后的影响:一项系统综述

Q1 Medicine
Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series Pub Date : 2017-05-25 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01
{"title":"出院后早期随访对心力衰竭或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者预后的影响:一项系统综述","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transitions in care can increase patients' vulnerability to adverse events. In particular, patients admitted for heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) have high rates of readmission and return emergency department visits. Heart failure patients have the highest 30-day readmission rates in Canada, and COPD patients comprise the highest volume of readmissions. Combined, these two conditions account for the largest number of emergency department returns. Prompt follow-up of discharged patients has been linked with reduced rates of readmission, emergency department use, and death. This systematic review evaluated the clinical effectiveness of early follow-up, within either 7 days or 30 days after hospital discharge, compared with usual care or a different time to follow-up, in reducing readmissions, emergency department visits, and mortality in patients with heart failure or COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a literature search to identify studies published in English up to May 25, 2016, on early follow-up after discharge from hospital in patients with heart failure or COPD. A single reviewer screened the titles and abstracts and obtained full-text articles for studies meeting the eligibility criteria. The risk of bias in the studies was evaluated according to ROBINS-I and EPOC criteria, and the quality of the body of evidence for each outcome was examined according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a total of 3,228 unique citations, we identified 10 eligible studies: one randomized controlled trial, two nonrandomized controlled trials, and seven observational studies. Four studies were specifically on 7-day follow-up and 30-day health outcomes. The other six studies were on 30-day follow-up and more variable time to health outcomes. Follow-up was conducted by general and specialist physicians, nurses, and pharmacists in clinics, by telephone, and by home visit. Risk of bias was moderate for most of the studies. Having follow-up within either 7 days or 30 days after hospitalization for heart failure or COPD was associated with lower all-cause readmissions, emergency department visits, and mortality, even after accounting for confounders such as age, sex, socioeconomic status, and disease severity (GRADE: Very low to low). However, the evidence was inconsistent. We did not find a difference in effectiveness between studies using a 7-day versus a 30-day follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on low- and very low-quality evidence, follow-up within 7 days and within 30 days of discharge from hospitalization for heart failure or COPD-compared with usual care or no follow-up-were both associated with a reduced risk of all-cause readmission, emergency department visits, and mortality. Overall, there is a lack of large, methodologically robust studies specifically focusing on the effectiveness of 7-day follow-up after discharge in improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39160,"journal":{"name":"Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series","volume":"17 8","pages":"1-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5466361/pdf/ohtas-17-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Early Follow-Up After Hospital Discharge on Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transitions in care can increase patients' vulnerability to adverse events. In particular, patients admitted for heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) have high rates of readmission and return emergency department visits. Heart failure patients have the highest 30-day readmission rates in Canada, and COPD patients comprise the highest volume of readmissions. Combined, these two conditions account for the largest number of emergency department returns. Prompt follow-up of discharged patients has been linked with reduced rates of readmission, emergency department use, and death. This systematic review evaluated the clinical effectiveness of early follow-up, within either 7 days or 30 days after hospital discharge, compared with usual care or a different time to follow-up, in reducing readmissions, emergency department visits, and mortality in patients with heart failure or COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a literature search to identify studies published in English up to May 25, 2016, on early follow-up after discharge from hospital in patients with heart failure or COPD. A single reviewer screened the titles and abstracts and obtained full-text articles for studies meeting the eligibility criteria. The risk of bias in the studies was evaluated according to ROBINS-I and EPOC criteria, and the quality of the body of evidence for each outcome was examined according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a total of 3,228 unique citations, we identified 10 eligible studies: one randomized controlled trial, two nonrandomized controlled trials, and seven observational studies. Four studies were specifically on 7-day follow-up and 30-day health outcomes. The other six studies were on 30-day follow-up and more variable time to health outcomes. Follow-up was conducted by general and specialist physicians, nurses, and pharmacists in clinics, by telephone, and by home visit. Risk of bias was moderate for most of the studies. Having follow-up within either 7 days or 30 days after hospitalization for heart failure or COPD was associated with lower all-cause readmissions, emergency department visits, and mortality, even after accounting for confounders such as age, sex, socioeconomic status, and disease severity (GRADE: Very low to low). However, the evidence was inconsistent. We did not find a difference in effectiveness between studies using a 7-day versus a 30-day follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on low- and very low-quality evidence, follow-up within 7 days and within 30 days of discharge from hospitalization for heart failure or COPD-compared with usual care or no follow-up-were both associated with a reduced risk of all-cause readmission, emergency department visits, and mortality. Overall, there is a lack of large, methodologically robust studies specifically focusing on the effectiveness of 7-day follow-up after discharge in improving patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"1-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5466361/pdf/ohtas-17-1.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护理的转变会增加患者对不良事件的易感性。特别是,因心力衰竭或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)入院的患者再入院率和急诊回访率很高。在加拿大,心力衰竭患者的30天再入院率最高,而COPD患者的再入院率最高。结合起来,这两种情况占急诊科返回的最大数量。出院患者的及时随访与再入院率、急诊科使用率和死亡率的降低有关。本系统综述评估了与常规护理或不同随访时间相比,出院后7天或30天内早期随访在减少心力衰竭或COPD患者再入院、急诊就诊和死亡率方面的临床效果。方法:我们进行了文献检索,以确定截至2016年5月25日发表的英文研究,这些研究涉及心力衰竭或COPD患者出院后的早期随访。单一审稿人筛选标题和摘要,并获得符合资格标准的研究的全文文章。根据ROBINS-I和EPOC标准评估研究的偏倚风险,并根据建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)工作组标准检查每个结果的证据体质量。结果:从总共3228个独特的引用中,我们确定了10个符合条件的研究:1个随机对照试验,2个非随机对照试验和7个观察性研究。有四项研究是专门针对7天随访和30天健康结果的。其他六项研究是30天的随访,健康结果的时间变化更大。随访由全科医生和专科医生、护士和药剂师在诊所通过电话和家访进行。大多数研究的偏倚风险为中等。在心力衰竭或慢性阻塞性肺病住院后7天或30天内进行随访与全因再入院率、急诊就诊率和死亡率降低相关,即使在考虑了年龄、性别、社会经济地位和疾病严重程度等混杂因素后也是如此(等级:非常低到低)。然而,证据并不一致。我们没有发现7天随访和30天随访在有效性上的差异。结论:基于低质量和极低质量的证据,与常规护理或无随访相比,因心力衰竭或copd出院后7天和30天内的随访均与全因再入院、急诊就诊和死亡率的降低相关。总的来说,缺乏大规模的、方法学上可靠的研究,专门关注出院后7天随访对改善患者预后的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Early Follow-Up After Hospital Discharge on Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review.

Background: Transitions in care can increase patients' vulnerability to adverse events. In particular, patients admitted for heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) have high rates of readmission and return emergency department visits. Heart failure patients have the highest 30-day readmission rates in Canada, and COPD patients comprise the highest volume of readmissions. Combined, these two conditions account for the largest number of emergency department returns. Prompt follow-up of discharged patients has been linked with reduced rates of readmission, emergency department use, and death. This systematic review evaluated the clinical effectiveness of early follow-up, within either 7 days or 30 days after hospital discharge, compared with usual care or a different time to follow-up, in reducing readmissions, emergency department visits, and mortality in patients with heart failure or COPD.

Methods: We performed a literature search to identify studies published in English up to May 25, 2016, on early follow-up after discharge from hospital in patients with heart failure or COPD. A single reviewer screened the titles and abstracts and obtained full-text articles for studies meeting the eligibility criteria. The risk of bias in the studies was evaluated according to ROBINS-I and EPOC criteria, and the quality of the body of evidence for each outcome was examined according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria.

Results: From a total of 3,228 unique citations, we identified 10 eligible studies: one randomized controlled trial, two nonrandomized controlled trials, and seven observational studies. Four studies were specifically on 7-day follow-up and 30-day health outcomes. The other six studies were on 30-day follow-up and more variable time to health outcomes. Follow-up was conducted by general and specialist physicians, nurses, and pharmacists in clinics, by telephone, and by home visit. Risk of bias was moderate for most of the studies. Having follow-up within either 7 days or 30 days after hospitalization for heart failure or COPD was associated with lower all-cause readmissions, emergency department visits, and mortality, even after accounting for confounders such as age, sex, socioeconomic status, and disease severity (GRADE: Very low to low). However, the evidence was inconsistent. We did not find a difference in effectiveness between studies using a 7-day versus a 30-day follow-up.

Conclusions: Based on low- and very low-quality evidence, follow-up within 7 days and within 30 days of discharge from hospitalization for heart failure or COPD-compared with usual care or no follow-up-were both associated with a reduced risk of all-cause readmission, emergency department visits, and mortality. Overall, there is a lack of large, methodologically robust studies specifically focusing on the effectiveness of 7-day follow-up after discharge in improving patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series
Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信