一种简单、微创的基于剥离器微量移液器的第3天胚胎活检技术。

Fertility research and practice Pub Date : 2016-11-25 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40738-016-0027-4
Luciano Cedillo, Azucena Ocampo-Bárcenas, Israel Maldonado, Francisco J Valdez-Morales, Felipe Camargo, Esther López-Bayghen
{"title":"一种简单、微创的基于剥离器微量移液器的第3天胚胎活检技术。","authors":"Luciano Cedillo,&nbsp;Azucena Ocampo-Bárcenas,&nbsp;Israel Maldonado,&nbsp;Francisco J Valdez-Morales,&nbsp;Felipe Camargo,&nbsp;Esther López-Bayghen","doi":"10.1186/s40738-016-0027-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is an important procedure for in vitro fertilization (IVF). A key step of PGS, blastomere removal, is abundant with many technical issues. The aim of this study was to compare a more simple procedure based on the Stipper Micropipetter, named S-biopsy, to the conventional aspiration method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On Day 3, 368 high-quality embryos (>7 cells on Day3 with <10% fragmentation) were collected from 38 women. For each patient, their embryos were equally separated between the conventional method (<i>n</i> = 188) and S-biopsy method (<i>n</i> = 180). The conventional method was performed using a standardized protocol. For the S-biopsy method, a laser was used to remove a significantly smaller portion of the zona pellucida. Afterwards, the complete embryo was aspirated with a Stripper Micropipetter, forcing the removal of the blastomere. Selected blastomeres went to PGS using CGH microarrays. Embryo integrity and blastocyst formation were assessed on Day 5. Differences between groups were assessed by either the Mann-Whitney test or Fisher Exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both methods resulted in the removal of only one blastomere. The S-biopsy and the conventional method did not differ in terms of affecting embryo integrity (95.0% vs. 95.7%) or blastocyst formation (72.7% vs. 70.7%). PGS analysis indicated that aneuploidy rate were similar between the two methods (63.1% vs. 65.2%). However, the time required to perform the S-biopsy method (179.2 ± 17.5 s) was significantly shorter (5-fold) than the conventional method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The S-biopsy method is comparable to the conventional method that is used to remove a blastomere for PGS, but requires less time. Furthermore, due to the simplicity of the S-biopsy technique, this method is more ideal for IVF laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":87254,"journal":{"name":"Fertility research and practice","volume":"2 ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40738-016-0027-4","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A simple, less invasive stripper micropipetter-based technique for day 3 embryo biopsy.\",\"authors\":\"Luciano Cedillo,&nbsp;Azucena Ocampo-Bárcenas,&nbsp;Israel Maldonado,&nbsp;Francisco J Valdez-Morales,&nbsp;Felipe Camargo,&nbsp;Esther López-Bayghen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40738-016-0027-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is an important procedure for in vitro fertilization (IVF). A key step of PGS, blastomere removal, is abundant with many technical issues. The aim of this study was to compare a more simple procedure based on the Stipper Micropipetter, named S-biopsy, to the conventional aspiration method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On Day 3, 368 high-quality embryos (>7 cells on Day3 with <10% fragmentation) were collected from 38 women. For each patient, their embryos were equally separated between the conventional method (<i>n</i> = 188) and S-biopsy method (<i>n</i> = 180). The conventional method was performed using a standardized protocol. For the S-biopsy method, a laser was used to remove a significantly smaller portion of the zona pellucida. Afterwards, the complete embryo was aspirated with a Stripper Micropipetter, forcing the removal of the blastomere. Selected blastomeres went to PGS using CGH microarrays. Embryo integrity and blastocyst formation were assessed on Day 5. Differences between groups were assessed by either the Mann-Whitney test or Fisher Exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both methods resulted in the removal of only one blastomere. The S-biopsy and the conventional method did not differ in terms of affecting embryo integrity (95.0% vs. 95.7%) or blastocyst formation (72.7% vs. 70.7%). PGS analysis indicated that aneuploidy rate were similar between the two methods (63.1% vs. 65.2%). However, the time required to perform the S-biopsy method (179.2 ± 17.5 s) was significantly shorter (5-fold) than the conventional method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The S-biopsy method is comparable to the conventional method that is used to remove a blastomere for PGS, but requires less time. Furthermore, due to the simplicity of the S-biopsy technique, this method is more ideal for IVF laboratories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility research and practice\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40738-016-0027-4\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-016-0027-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-016-0027-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:植入前基因筛查(PGS)是体外受精(IVF)的一项重要程序。PGS的一个关键步骤,卵裂球的去除,充满了许多技术问题。本研究的目的是将一种基于Stipper微量移液器的更简单的程序(称为S活检)与传统的抽吸方法进行比较。方法:第3天,368个高质量胚胎(第3天>7个细胞 = 188)和S活检法(n = 180)。使用标准化协议执行传统方法。对于S活检方法,使用激光切除透明带的一小部分。然后,用Stripper微量移液器吸出完整的胚胎,迫使其摘除卵裂球。选择的卵裂球使用CGH微阵列进行PGS。在第5天评估胚胎完整性和胚泡形成。通过Mann-Whitney检验或Fisher精确检验评估各组之间的差异。结果:两种方法都只切除了一个卵裂球。S活检和传统方法在影响胚胎完整性(95.0%对95.7%)或胚泡形成(72.7%对70.7%)方面没有差异。PGS分析表明,两种方法的非整倍体率相似(63.1%对65.2%)。然而,进行S活检所需的时间(179.2 ± 17.5秒)明显短于常规方法(5倍)。结论:S型活检方法与传统的PGS卵裂球切除方法相当,但所需时间较少。此外,由于S活检技术的简单性,这种方法更适合试管婴儿实验室。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A simple, less invasive stripper micropipetter-based technique for day 3 embryo biopsy.

Background: Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is an important procedure for in vitro fertilization (IVF). A key step of PGS, blastomere removal, is abundant with many technical issues. The aim of this study was to compare a more simple procedure based on the Stipper Micropipetter, named S-biopsy, to the conventional aspiration method.

Methods: On Day 3, 368 high-quality embryos (>7 cells on Day3 with <10% fragmentation) were collected from 38 women. For each patient, their embryos were equally separated between the conventional method (n = 188) and S-biopsy method (n = 180). The conventional method was performed using a standardized protocol. For the S-biopsy method, a laser was used to remove a significantly smaller portion of the zona pellucida. Afterwards, the complete embryo was aspirated with a Stripper Micropipetter, forcing the removal of the blastomere. Selected blastomeres went to PGS using CGH microarrays. Embryo integrity and blastocyst formation were assessed on Day 5. Differences between groups were assessed by either the Mann-Whitney test or Fisher Exact test.

Results: Both methods resulted in the removal of only one blastomere. The S-biopsy and the conventional method did not differ in terms of affecting embryo integrity (95.0% vs. 95.7%) or blastocyst formation (72.7% vs. 70.7%). PGS analysis indicated that aneuploidy rate were similar between the two methods (63.1% vs. 65.2%). However, the time required to perform the S-biopsy method (179.2 ± 17.5 s) was significantly shorter (5-fold) than the conventional method.

Conclusion: The S-biopsy method is comparable to the conventional method that is used to remove a blastomere for PGS, but requires less time. Furthermore, due to the simplicity of the S-biopsy technique, this method is more ideal for IVF laboratories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信