电阻抗测量对周围神经功能的监测

Q Medicine
Alexandre Fouchard , Véronique Coizet , Valérie Sinniger , Didier Clarençon , Karin Pernet-Gallay , Stéphane Bonnet , Olivier David
{"title":"电阻抗测量对周围神经功能的监测","authors":"Alexandre Fouchard ,&nbsp;Véronique Coizet ,&nbsp;Valérie Sinniger ,&nbsp;Didier Clarençon ,&nbsp;Karin Pernet-Gallay ,&nbsp;Stéphane Bonnet ,&nbsp;Olivier David","doi":"10.1016/j.jphysparis.2017.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Medical electrical stimulators adapted to peripheral nerves use multicontact cuff electrodes (MCC) to provide selective neural interfaces. However, neuroprostheses are currently limited by their inability to locate the regions of interest to focus. Intended until now either for stimulation or recording, MCC can also be used as a means of transduction to characterize the nerve by impedancemetry. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of using electrical impedance (EI) measurements as an in vivo functional nerve monitoring technique. The monitoring paradigm includes the synchronized recording of both the evoked endogenous activity as compound action potentials (CAP) and the superimposed sine signal from the EI probe. Measurements were conducted on the </span>sciatic nerve<span> of rodents, chosen for its branchings towards the peroneal and tibial nerves, with both mono- and multi-contact per section electrodes. During stimulation phases, recordings showed CAP with consistent fiber conduction velocities. During coupled phases of both stimulation and sine perturbation, impedance variations were extracted using the mono-contact electrode type for certain frequencies, e.g. 2.941</span></span> <span><span>kHz, and were temporally coherent with the previous recorded CAP. Using a MCC, localized evoked CAP were also recorded but the signal to noise ratio (SNR) was too low to distinguish the expected associated impedance variation and deduce an image of impedance spatial changes within the nerve. The conducted in vivo measurements allowed to distinguish both evoked CAP and associated impedance variations with a strong temporal correlation. This indicates the feasibility of functional EI monitoring, aiming at detecting the impedance variations in relation to neural activity. Further work is needed to improve the in vivo system, namely in terms of SNR, and to integrate new multicontact devices in order to move towards </span>EI tomography with the detection of spatially-localized impedance variations. Eventually, regions that are interesting to be targeted by stimulation could be identified through these means.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-Paris","volume":"110 4","pages":"Pages 361-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2017.05.003","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional monitoring of peripheral nerves from electrical impedance measurements\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Fouchard ,&nbsp;Véronique Coizet ,&nbsp;Valérie Sinniger ,&nbsp;Didier Clarençon ,&nbsp;Karin Pernet-Gallay ,&nbsp;Stéphane Bonnet ,&nbsp;Olivier David\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jphysparis.2017.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Medical electrical stimulators adapted to peripheral nerves use multicontact cuff electrodes (MCC) to provide selective neural interfaces. However, neuroprostheses are currently limited by their inability to locate the regions of interest to focus. Intended until now either for stimulation or recording, MCC can also be used as a means of transduction to characterize the nerve by impedancemetry. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of using electrical impedance (EI) measurements as an in vivo functional nerve monitoring technique. The monitoring paradigm includes the synchronized recording of both the evoked endogenous activity as compound action potentials (CAP) and the superimposed sine signal from the EI probe. Measurements were conducted on the </span>sciatic nerve<span> of rodents, chosen for its branchings towards the peroneal and tibial nerves, with both mono- and multi-contact per section electrodes. During stimulation phases, recordings showed CAP with consistent fiber conduction velocities. During coupled phases of both stimulation and sine perturbation, impedance variations were extracted using the mono-contact electrode type for certain frequencies, e.g. 2.941</span></span> <span><span>kHz, and were temporally coherent with the previous recorded CAP. Using a MCC, localized evoked CAP were also recorded but the signal to noise ratio (SNR) was too low to distinguish the expected associated impedance variation and deduce an image of impedance spatial changes within the nerve. The conducted in vivo measurements allowed to distinguish both evoked CAP and associated impedance variations with a strong temporal correlation. This indicates the feasibility of functional EI monitoring, aiming at detecting the impedance variations in relation to neural activity. Further work is needed to improve the in vivo system, namely in terms of SNR, and to integrate new multicontact devices in order to move towards </span>EI tomography with the detection of spatially-localized impedance variations. Eventually, regions that are interesting to be targeted by stimulation could be identified through these means.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiology-Paris\",\"volume\":\"110 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 361-371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2017.05.003\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiology-Paris\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928425717300360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-Paris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928425717300360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

适用于周围神经的医用电刺激器使用多接触袖带电极(MCC)提供选择性神经接口。然而,神经假体目前由于无法定位感兴趣的区域而受到限制。到目前为止,MCC要么用于刺激,要么用于记录,它也可以作为一种传导手段,通过阻抗测量来表征神经。在这项研究中,我们探讨了使用电阻抗(EI)测量作为体内功能神经监测技术的可行性。监测范式包括以复合动作电位(CAP)形式同步记录诱发的内源性活动和来自EI探针的叠加正弦信号。对鼠类的坐骨神经进行测量,选择其分支为腓神经和胫神经,每节使用单触点和多触点电极。在刺激阶段,记录显示CAP具有一致的纤维传导速度。在刺激和正弦扰动的耦合阶段,使用单接触电极类型提取特定频率(例如2.941 kHz)的阻抗变化,并与先前记录的CAP在时间上一致。使用MCC,也记录了局部诱发的CAP,但信噪比(SNR)过低,无法区分预期的相关阻抗变化,并推断出神经内阻抗空间变化的图像。在体内进行的测量可以区分诱发的CAP和相关的阻抗变化,具有很强的时间相关性。这表明功能性EI监测的可行性,旨在检测与神经活动相关的阻抗变化。进一步的工作需要改进体内系统,即在信噪比方面,并集成新的多接触设备,以便向具有空间局部阻抗变化检测的EI断层扫描发展。最终,通过这些方法可以识别出刺激的目标区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional monitoring of peripheral nerves from electrical impedance measurements

Medical electrical stimulators adapted to peripheral nerves use multicontact cuff electrodes (MCC) to provide selective neural interfaces. However, neuroprostheses are currently limited by their inability to locate the regions of interest to focus. Intended until now either for stimulation or recording, MCC can also be used as a means of transduction to characterize the nerve by impedancemetry. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of using electrical impedance (EI) measurements as an in vivo functional nerve monitoring technique. The monitoring paradigm includes the synchronized recording of both the evoked endogenous activity as compound action potentials (CAP) and the superimposed sine signal from the EI probe. Measurements were conducted on the sciatic nerve of rodents, chosen for its branchings towards the peroneal and tibial nerves, with both mono- and multi-contact per section electrodes. During stimulation phases, recordings showed CAP with consistent fiber conduction velocities. During coupled phases of both stimulation and sine perturbation, impedance variations were extracted using the mono-contact electrode type for certain frequencies, e.g. 2.941 kHz, and were temporally coherent with the previous recorded CAP. Using a MCC, localized evoked CAP were also recorded but the signal to noise ratio (SNR) was too low to distinguish the expected associated impedance variation and deduce an image of impedance spatial changes within the nerve. The conducted in vivo measurements allowed to distinguish both evoked CAP and associated impedance variations with a strong temporal correlation. This indicates the feasibility of functional EI monitoring, aiming at detecting the impedance variations in relation to neural activity. Further work is needed to improve the in vivo system, namely in terms of SNR, and to integrate new multicontact devices in order to move towards EI tomography with the detection of spatially-localized impedance variations. Eventually, regions that are interesting to be targeted by stimulation could be identified through these means.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-Paris
Journal of Physiology-Paris 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.02
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each issue of the Journal of Physiology (Paris) is specially commissioned, and provides an overview of one important area of neuroscience, delivering review and research papers from leading researchers in that field. The content will interest both those specializing in the experimental study of the brain and those working in interdisciplinary fields linking theory and biological data, including cellular neuroscience, mathematical analysis of brain function, computational neuroscience, biophysics of brain imaging and cognitive psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信