粘菌素和利福平对多药耐药鲍曼不动杆菌的协同作用:系统综述和荟萃分析。

Q3 Immunology and Microbiology
Open Microbiology Journal Pub Date : 2017-04-28 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874285801711010063
Maryam Mohammadi, Hatef Khayat, Koroush Sayehmiri, Setareh Soroush, Fatemeh Sayehmiri, Somayeh Delfani, Lidija Bogdanovic, Morovat Taherikalani
{"title":"粘菌素和利福平对多药耐药鲍曼不动杆菌的协同作用:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Maryam Mohammadi,&nbsp;Hatef Khayat,&nbsp;Koroush Sayehmiri,&nbsp;Setareh Soroush,&nbsp;Fatemeh Sayehmiri,&nbsp;Somayeh Delfani,&nbsp;Lidija Bogdanovic,&nbsp;Morovat Taherikalani","doi":"10.2174/1874285801711010063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The existence of infections caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> is a growing problem because of the difficulty to treat them. We examined the published literature and focused our analysis on the investigation of the synergism of colistin and rifampin against MDR <i>A. baumannii</i> isolates <i>via</i> systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic literature search was performed using the following 4 databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE and ISI Web of Sciences). The related articles were evaluated during the period from December 2014 to January 2015. Information based on resistance and sensitivity to antibiotics, the minimum inhibitory concentration and the effects of two antibiotics on each other including synergism, antagonism, relative synergism and additive antagonism were extracted. A meta-analysis of 17 studies including 448 samples was brought into process and 2% (95% CI 0-4%) and 72% (95% CI 56-89%) resistance to colistin and rifampin were observed, respectively. 42% of all isolates showed MIC = 4 µg/ml (95% CI 14-69%) to rifampin and 30% MIC= 2 µg/ml to colistin (95% CI 3.8-78%). MIC<sub>50</sub> and MIC<sub>90</sub> for both rifampin and colistin were 2 µg/ml and 4 µg/ml, respectively. 63% of the strains demonstrated synergy (95% CI 37-90%), 7% were highlighted as relative synergism (95% CI 0.0- 13%), 3% showed an additive effect (95% CI -0.0-7%) and 14% were indifferent (95% CI 6-23%). The antagonistic effect was not observed in this combination. Synergy rates of time-kill assay in rifampin and colistin combinations were generally higher than those of check bored microdilution and E-test method. The results demonstrated that the combination therapy could be more useful when compared to monotherapy and that this strategy might reduce the resistance rate to rifampin in MDR <i>A. baumannii</i> isolates.</p>","PeriodicalId":38953,"journal":{"name":"Open Microbiology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874285801711010063","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergistic Effect of Colistin and Rifampin Against Multidrug Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Mohammadi,&nbsp;Hatef Khayat,&nbsp;Koroush Sayehmiri,&nbsp;Setareh Soroush,&nbsp;Fatemeh Sayehmiri,&nbsp;Somayeh Delfani,&nbsp;Lidija Bogdanovic,&nbsp;Morovat Taherikalani\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874285801711010063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The existence of infections caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> is a growing problem because of the difficulty to treat them. We examined the published literature and focused our analysis on the investigation of the synergism of colistin and rifampin against MDR <i>A. baumannii</i> isolates <i>via</i> systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic literature search was performed using the following 4 databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE and ISI Web of Sciences). The related articles were evaluated during the period from December 2014 to January 2015. Information based on resistance and sensitivity to antibiotics, the minimum inhibitory concentration and the effects of two antibiotics on each other including synergism, antagonism, relative synergism and additive antagonism were extracted. A meta-analysis of 17 studies including 448 samples was brought into process and 2% (95% CI 0-4%) and 72% (95% CI 56-89%) resistance to colistin and rifampin were observed, respectively. 42% of all isolates showed MIC = 4 µg/ml (95% CI 14-69%) to rifampin and 30% MIC= 2 µg/ml to colistin (95% CI 3.8-78%). MIC<sub>50</sub> and MIC<sub>90</sub> for both rifampin and colistin were 2 µg/ml and 4 µg/ml, respectively. 63% of the strains demonstrated synergy (95% CI 37-90%), 7% were highlighted as relative synergism (95% CI 0.0- 13%), 3% showed an additive effect (95% CI -0.0-7%) and 14% were indifferent (95% CI 6-23%). The antagonistic effect was not observed in this combination. Synergy rates of time-kill assay in rifampin and colistin combinations were generally higher than those of check bored microdilution and E-test method. The results demonstrated that the combination therapy could be more useful when compared to monotherapy and that this strategy might reduce the resistance rate to rifampin in MDR <i>A. baumannii</i> isolates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Microbiology Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874285801711010063\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Microbiology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874285801711010063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Immunology and Microbiology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Microbiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874285801711010063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

多药耐药鲍曼不动杆菌引起的感染由于治疗困难而日益成为一个问题。我们检查了已发表的文献,并通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,重点分析了粘菌素和利福平对耐多药鲍曼尼杆菌分离株的协同作用。使用PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE和ISI Web of Sciences 4个数据库进行系统的文献检索。对2014年12月至2015年1月期间的相关文章进行评价。提取对抗生素的耐药性和敏感性、最低抑菌浓度以及两种抗生素的协同作用、拮抗作用、相对协同作用和加性拮抗作用。对包括448份样本的17项研究进行了荟萃分析,分别观察到2% (95% CI 0-4%)和72% (95% CI 56-89%)的粘菌素和利福平耐药。42%的分离株对利福平的MIC= 4µg/ml (95% CI 14-69%), 30%的分离株对粘菌素的MIC= 2µg/ml (95% CI 3.8-78%)。利福平和粘菌素的MIC50和MIC90分别为2µg/ml和4µg/ml。63%的菌株表现出协同作用(95% CI 37 ~ 90%), 7%的菌株表现出相对协同作用(95% CI 0.0 ~ 13%), 3%的菌株表现出加性效应(95% CI -0.0 ~ 7%), 14%的菌株表现出无协同作用(95% CI 6 ~ 23%)。在该组合中未观察到拮抗作用。利福平与粘菌素联用时效测定的协同率普遍高于微孔稀释法和e试验法。结果表明,与单一治疗相比,联合治疗可能更有用,并且该策略可能降低耐多药鲍曼杆菌分离株对利福平的耐药率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Synergistic Effect of Colistin and Rifampin Against Multidrug Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Synergistic Effect of Colistin and Rifampin Against Multidrug Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Synergistic Effect of Colistin and Rifampin Against Multidrug Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Synergistic Effect of Colistin and Rifampin Against Multidrug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The existence of infections caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii is a growing problem because of the difficulty to treat them. We examined the published literature and focused our analysis on the investigation of the synergism of colistin and rifampin against MDR A. baumannii isolates via systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic literature search was performed using the following 4 databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE and ISI Web of Sciences). The related articles were evaluated during the period from December 2014 to January 2015. Information based on resistance and sensitivity to antibiotics, the minimum inhibitory concentration and the effects of two antibiotics on each other including synergism, antagonism, relative synergism and additive antagonism were extracted. A meta-analysis of 17 studies including 448 samples was brought into process and 2% (95% CI 0-4%) and 72% (95% CI 56-89%) resistance to colistin and rifampin were observed, respectively. 42% of all isolates showed MIC = 4 µg/ml (95% CI 14-69%) to rifampin and 30% MIC= 2 µg/ml to colistin (95% CI 3.8-78%). MIC50 and MIC90 for both rifampin and colistin were 2 µg/ml and 4 µg/ml, respectively. 63% of the strains demonstrated synergy (95% CI 37-90%), 7% were highlighted as relative synergism (95% CI 0.0- 13%), 3% showed an additive effect (95% CI -0.0-7%) and 14% were indifferent (95% CI 6-23%). The antagonistic effect was not observed in this combination. Synergy rates of time-kill assay in rifampin and colistin combinations were generally higher than those of check bored microdilution and E-test method. The results demonstrated that the combination therapy could be more useful when compared to monotherapy and that this strategy might reduce the resistance rate to rifampin in MDR A. baumannii isolates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Microbiology Journal
Open Microbiology Journal Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Open Microbiology Journal is a peer-reviewed open access journal which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, case studies, guest edited thematic issues and short communications/letters covering theoretical and practical aspects of Microbial systematics, evolutionary microbiology, immunology, virology, parasitology , bacteriology, mycology, phycology, protozoology, microbial ecology, molecular biology, microbial physiology, biochemistry, microbial pathogenesis, host-microbe interaction, systems microbiology, synthetic microbiology, bioinformatics. The Open Microbiology Journal , a peer-reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and freely available to researchers worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信