危重成人疼痛评估行为检查表的Rasch分析。

Journal of applied measurement Pub Date : 2017-01-01
Christophe Chenier, Gilles Raiche, Nadine Talbot, Bianca Carignan, Celine Gelinas
{"title":"危重成人疼痛评估行为检查表的Rasch分析。","authors":"Christophe Chenier,&nbsp;Gilles Raiche,&nbsp;Nadine Talbot,&nbsp;Bianca Carignan,&nbsp;Celine Gelinas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) are often unable to report their pain, which is a problem since untreated pain is associated with negative health outcomes. The use of behavioral pain scales are recommended for the detection of the presence of pain in this vulnerable population. Previous validation studies have used classical techniques, and several psychometrics properties remain unknown. In this paper, data obtained from a behavioral checklist of dichotomized items was utilized to evaluate the instrument's dimensionality, its construct validity and its capacity to distinguish between levels of pain by using Rasch measurement. A sample of 239 ICU patients was used to collect the data. Results showed that, while unidimensionality was acceptable, concerns remained about the local independence and item fit indices. A third of the items showed misfit. Finally, while items had a great reliability (0.97), persons' measures had a rather low reliability (0.62) and only 1.28 strata of pain could be distinguished. The narrow range of pain levels in the sample could explain this poor performance and further study is needed, with a sample exhibiting a wider range of pain levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"18 1","pages":"28-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rasch Analysis of a Behavioral Checklist for the Assessment of Pain in Critically Ill Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Christophe Chenier,&nbsp;Gilles Raiche,&nbsp;Nadine Talbot,&nbsp;Bianca Carignan,&nbsp;Celine Gelinas\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) are often unable to report their pain, which is a problem since untreated pain is associated with negative health outcomes. The use of behavioral pain scales are recommended for the detection of the presence of pain in this vulnerable population. Previous validation studies have used classical techniques, and several psychometrics properties remain unknown. In this paper, data obtained from a behavioral checklist of dichotomized items was utilized to evaluate the instrument's dimensionality, its construct validity and its capacity to distinguish between levels of pain by using Rasch measurement. A sample of 239 ICU patients was used to collect the data. Results showed that, while unidimensionality was acceptable, concerns remained about the local independence and item fit indices. A third of the items showed misfit. Finally, while items had a great reliability (0.97), persons' measures had a rather low reliability (0.62) and only 1.28 strata of pain could be distinguished. The narrow range of pain levels in the sample could explain this poor performance and further study is needed, with a sample exhibiting a wider range of pain levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"28-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在重症监护病房(ICU)住院的患者往往无法报告他们的疼痛,这是一个问题,因为未经治疗的疼痛与负面的健康结果有关。建议使用行为疼痛量表来检测这一弱势群体中疼痛的存在。先前的验证研究使用了经典技术,一些心理测量学特性仍然未知。在本文中,从二分类项目行为检查表中获得的数据被用来评估工具的维度,它的结构效度和它区分疼痛水平的能力,使用Rasch测量。以239例ICU患者为样本收集数据。结果表明,虽然单维性是可以接受的,但局部独立性和项目拟合指标仍然存在问题。三分之一的物品显示不匹配。最后,虽然项目具有很高的信度(0.97),但人的测量具有相当低的信度(0.62),并且只能区分1.28层疼痛。样本中疼痛水平的狭窄范围可以解释这种糟糕的表现,需要进一步的研究,样本显示更大范围的疼痛水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rasch Analysis of a Behavioral Checklist for the Assessment of Pain in Critically Ill Adults.

Patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) are often unable to report their pain, which is a problem since untreated pain is associated with negative health outcomes. The use of behavioral pain scales are recommended for the detection of the presence of pain in this vulnerable population. Previous validation studies have used classical techniques, and several psychometrics properties remain unknown. In this paper, data obtained from a behavioral checklist of dichotomized items was utilized to evaluate the instrument's dimensionality, its construct validity and its capacity to distinguish between levels of pain by using Rasch measurement. A sample of 239 ICU patients was used to collect the data. Results showed that, while unidimensionality was acceptable, concerns remained about the local independence and item fit indices. A third of the items showed misfit. Finally, while items had a great reliability (0.97), persons' measures had a rather low reliability (0.62) and only 1.28 strata of pain could be distinguished. The narrow range of pain levels in the sample could explain this poor performance and further study is needed, with a sample exhibiting a wider range of pain levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信