评估心肺复苏期间不同剂量频率肾上腺素药代动力学的临床试验模拟。

MEDtube science Pub Date : 2016-06-01 Epub Date: 2016-06-30
Andy R Eugene
{"title":"评估心肺复苏期间不同剂量频率肾上腺素药代动力学的临床试验模拟。","authors":"Andy R Eugene","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article seeks to test the hypothesis that repeated 1mg intravenous epinephrine dosing intervals of 3-minutes and 5-minutes results in differences in the total drug exposure and the maximum epinephrine concentration using simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) dosing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Published population pharmacokinetic parameters were identified in the literature and pharmacokinetic dosing simulations were conducted according to the 2015 American Heart Association guidelines for CPR in adults. The stochastic pharmacokinetic simulations were conducted in MATLAB and R for statistical programming.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5000 simulations were conducted in MATLAB while 90,000 data points for the 3-minute dosing interval and 150,000 data points for the 5-minute epinephrine dosing interval resulted from pharmacokinetic simulations in R. The difference between the 3-minute and 5-minute dosing intervals for patients with a SAP score of 30, were found to be: Male ΔAUC=2416 and ΔCmax=71, Female ΔAUC=1422 and ΔCmax=41, and for a 70kg patient ΔAUC=2968 and ΔCmax=90. While in virtual healthy participants, the differences were calculated to be ΔAUC=2658 and ΔCmax=81 for 3-minute and 5-minute dosing frequencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Epinephrine plasma levels during a simulated CPR scenario in a virtual patient population are dependent upon intravenous dosing intervals of either 3-minutes or 5-minutes. Based on the results of this clinical trial simulation, implications may exist that may require clinical studies investigating the influence of the 1mg epinephrine dosing frequency on the return of spontaneous circulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":91361,"journal":{"name":"MEDtube science","volume":"4 2","pages":"8-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5399886/pdf/nihms854795.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Clinical Trial Simulation Evaluating Epinephrine Pharmacokinetics at various Dosing Frequencies during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.\",\"authors\":\"Andy R Eugene\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article seeks to test the hypothesis that repeated 1mg intravenous epinephrine dosing intervals of 3-minutes and 5-minutes results in differences in the total drug exposure and the maximum epinephrine concentration using simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) dosing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Published population pharmacokinetic parameters were identified in the literature and pharmacokinetic dosing simulations were conducted according to the 2015 American Heart Association guidelines for CPR in adults. The stochastic pharmacokinetic simulations were conducted in MATLAB and R for statistical programming.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5000 simulations were conducted in MATLAB while 90,000 data points for the 3-minute dosing interval and 150,000 data points for the 5-minute epinephrine dosing interval resulted from pharmacokinetic simulations in R. The difference between the 3-minute and 5-minute dosing intervals for patients with a SAP score of 30, were found to be: Male ΔAUC=2416 and ΔCmax=71, Female ΔAUC=1422 and ΔCmax=41, and for a 70kg patient ΔAUC=2968 and ΔCmax=90. While in virtual healthy participants, the differences were calculated to be ΔAUC=2658 and ΔCmax=81 for 3-minute and 5-minute dosing frequencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Epinephrine plasma levels during a simulated CPR scenario in a virtual patient population are dependent upon intravenous dosing intervals of either 3-minutes or 5-minutes. Based on the results of this clinical trial simulation, implications may exist that may require clinical studies investigating the influence of the 1mg epinephrine dosing frequency on the return of spontaneous circulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MEDtube science\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"8-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5399886/pdf/nihms854795.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MEDtube science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDtube science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过模拟心肺复苏(CPR)给药,验证以3分钟和5分钟间隔重复给药1mg肾上腺素的假设会导致总药物暴露量和最大肾上腺素浓度的差异。方法:从文献中确定已发表的人群药代动力学参数,并根据2015年美国心脏协会成人心肺复苏指南进行药代动力学剂量模拟。随机药代动力学模拟在MATLAB和R中进行统计编程。结果:在MATLAB中共进行了5000次模拟,其中r的药代动力学模拟得到3分钟给药间隔90000个数据点和5分钟给药间隔150000个数据点。对于SAP评分为30的患者,3分钟和5分钟给药间隔的差异为:男性ΔAUC=2416和ΔCmax=71,女性ΔAUC=1422和ΔCmax=41, 70kg患者ΔAUC=2968和ΔCmax=90。而在虚拟健康的参与者中,3分钟和5分钟给药频率的差异计算为ΔAUC=2658和ΔCmax=81。结论:在一个虚拟的病人群体中,模拟CPR场景中肾上腺素血浆水平依赖于静脉给药间隔3分钟或5分钟。根据该临床试验模拟的结果,可能需要进行临床研究,研究1mg肾上腺素给药频率对自发循环恢复的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Clinical Trial Simulation Evaluating Epinephrine Pharmacokinetics at various Dosing Frequencies during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

A Clinical Trial Simulation Evaluating Epinephrine Pharmacokinetics at various Dosing Frequencies during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

A Clinical Trial Simulation Evaluating Epinephrine Pharmacokinetics at various Dosing Frequencies during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

A Clinical Trial Simulation Evaluating Epinephrine Pharmacokinetics at various Dosing Frequencies during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Objective: This article seeks to test the hypothesis that repeated 1mg intravenous epinephrine dosing intervals of 3-minutes and 5-minutes results in differences in the total drug exposure and the maximum epinephrine concentration using simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) dosing.

Methods: Published population pharmacokinetic parameters were identified in the literature and pharmacokinetic dosing simulations were conducted according to the 2015 American Heart Association guidelines for CPR in adults. The stochastic pharmacokinetic simulations were conducted in MATLAB and R for statistical programming.

Results: A total of 5000 simulations were conducted in MATLAB while 90,000 data points for the 3-minute dosing interval and 150,000 data points for the 5-minute epinephrine dosing interval resulted from pharmacokinetic simulations in R. The difference between the 3-minute and 5-minute dosing intervals for patients with a SAP score of 30, were found to be: Male ΔAUC=2416 and ΔCmax=71, Female ΔAUC=1422 and ΔCmax=41, and for a 70kg patient ΔAUC=2968 and ΔCmax=90. While in virtual healthy participants, the differences were calculated to be ΔAUC=2658 and ΔCmax=81 for 3-minute and 5-minute dosing frequencies.

Conclusions: Epinephrine plasma levels during a simulated CPR scenario in a virtual patient population are dependent upon intravenous dosing intervals of either 3-minutes or 5-minutes. Based on the results of this clinical trial simulation, implications may exist that may require clinical studies investigating the influence of the 1mg epinephrine dosing frequency on the return of spontaneous circulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信