降低治疗伴有广场恐怖症和广泛性焦虑障碍的惊恐障碍的费用。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Vedrana Ikic, Claude Belanger, Stephane Bouchard, Patrick Gosselin, Frederic Langlois, Joane Labrecque, Michel J Dugas, Andre Marchand
{"title":"降低治疗伴有广场恐怖症和广泛性焦虑障碍的惊恐障碍的费用。","authors":"Vedrana Ikic,&nbsp;Claude Belanger,&nbsp;Stephane Bouchard,&nbsp;Patrick Gosselin,&nbsp;Frederic Langlois,&nbsp;Joane Labrecque,&nbsp;Michel J Dugas,&nbsp;Andre Marchand","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Panic disorder with agoraphobia (PDA) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are impairing and costly disorders that are often misdiagnosed and left untreated despite multiple consultations. These disorders frequently co-occur, but little is known about the costs associated with their comorbidity and the impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) on cost reduction.</p><p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>The first objective of this study was to assess the mental health-related costs associated with the specific concomitance of PDA and GAD. The second aim was to determine whether there is a reduction in direct and indirect mental health-related costs following conventional CBT for the primary disorder only (PDA or GAD) or combined CBT adapted to the comorbidity (PDA and GAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 123 participants with a double diagnosis of PDA and GAD participated in this study. Direct and indirect mental health-related costs were assessed and calculated from a societal perspective at the pre-test, the post-test, and the three-month, six-month and one-year follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the pre-test, PDA-GAD comorbidity was found to generate a mean total cost of CADUSD 2,000.48 (SD = USD 2,069.62) per participant over a three-month period. The indirect costs were much higher than the direct costs. Both treatment modalities led to significant and similar decreases in all cost categories from the pre-test to the post-test. This reduction was maintained until the one-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Methodological choices may have underestimated cost evaluations. Nonetheless, this study supports the cost offset effects of both conventional CBT for primary PDA or GAD and combined CBT for PDA-GAD comorbidity.</p><p><strong>Implications for healthcare provision and use: </strong>Treatment of comorbid and costly disorders with evidence-based treatments such as CBT may lead to considerable economic benefits for society.</p><p><strong>Implications for health policies: </strong>Considering the limited resources of healthcare systems, it is important to make choices that will lead to better accessibility of quality services. The application of CBT for PDA, GAD or both disorders and training mental health professionals in this therapeutic approach should be encouraged. Additionally, it would be favorable for insurance plans to reimburse employees for expenses associated with psychological treatment for anxiety disorders.</p><p><strong>Implications for further research: </strong>In addition to symptom reduction, it would be of great pertinence to explore which factors can contribute to reducing direct and indirect mental health-related costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"20 1","pages":"11-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduction in Costs after Treating Comorbid Panic Disorder with Agoraphobia and Generalized Anxiety Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Vedrana Ikic,&nbsp;Claude Belanger,&nbsp;Stephane Bouchard,&nbsp;Patrick Gosselin,&nbsp;Frederic Langlois,&nbsp;Joane Labrecque,&nbsp;Michel J Dugas,&nbsp;Andre Marchand\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Panic disorder with agoraphobia (PDA) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are impairing and costly disorders that are often misdiagnosed and left untreated despite multiple consultations. These disorders frequently co-occur, but little is known about the costs associated with their comorbidity and the impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) on cost reduction.</p><p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>The first objective of this study was to assess the mental health-related costs associated with the specific concomitance of PDA and GAD. The second aim was to determine whether there is a reduction in direct and indirect mental health-related costs following conventional CBT for the primary disorder only (PDA or GAD) or combined CBT adapted to the comorbidity (PDA and GAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 123 participants with a double diagnosis of PDA and GAD participated in this study. Direct and indirect mental health-related costs were assessed and calculated from a societal perspective at the pre-test, the post-test, and the three-month, six-month and one-year follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the pre-test, PDA-GAD comorbidity was found to generate a mean total cost of CADUSD 2,000.48 (SD = USD 2,069.62) per participant over a three-month period. The indirect costs were much higher than the direct costs. Both treatment modalities led to significant and similar decreases in all cost categories from the pre-test to the post-test. This reduction was maintained until the one-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Methodological choices may have underestimated cost evaluations. Nonetheless, this study supports the cost offset effects of both conventional CBT for primary PDA or GAD and combined CBT for PDA-GAD comorbidity.</p><p><strong>Implications for healthcare provision and use: </strong>Treatment of comorbid and costly disorders with evidence-based treatments such as CBT may lead to considerable economic benefits for society.</p><p><strong>Implications for health policies: </strong>Considering the limited resources of healthcare systems, it is important to make choices that will lead to better accessibility of quality services. The application of CBT for PDA, GAD or both disorders and training mental health professionals in this therapeutic approach should be encouraged. Additionally, it would be favorable for insurance plans to reimburse employees for expenses associated with psychological treatment for anxiety disorders.</p><p><strong>Implications for further research: </strong>In addition to symptom reduction, it would be of great pertinence to explore which factors can contribute to reducing direct and indirect mental health-related costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"11-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:惊恐障碍伴广场恐怖症(PDA)和广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)是损害性和昂贵的疾病,尽管多次咨询,但经常被误诊和未得到治疗。这些疾病经常同时发生,但对其合并症的相关成本以及认知行为疗法(CBT)对降低成本的影响知之甚少。研究目的:本研究的第一个目的是评估与PDA和广泛性焦虑症相关的心理健康相关成本。第二个目的是确定仅针对原发性疾病(PDA或广泛性焦虑症)的常规CBT或适用于合并症(PDA和广泛性焦虑症)的联合CBT是否会降低直接和间接的精神健康相关成本。方法:对123例双重诊断为PDA和GAD的患者进行研究。在测试前、测试后以及3个月、6个月和1年的随访中,从社会角度评估和计算了直接和间接的心理健康相关成本。结果:在预测试中,发现PDA-GAD合并症在三个月的时间内导致每位参与者的平均总成本为2,000.48加元(SD = 2,069.62美元)。间接成本远高于直接成本。从测试前到测试后,两种治疗方式都导致了所有类别成本的显著和相似的降低。这种减少一直保持到一年的随访。讨论:方法选择可能低估了成本评估。尽管如此,本研究支持传统CBT治疗原发性PDA或广泛性焦虑症和联合CBT治疗PDA-广泛性焦虑症合并症的成本抵消效应。对医疗保健提供和使用的影响:用CBT等循证治疗方法治疗合并症和昂贵的疾病可能会给社会带来可观的经济效益。对卫生政策的影响:考虑到卫生保健系统的资源有限,重要的是做出能够更好地获得优质服务的选择。应鼓励将CBT应用于PDA、广泛性焦虑症或两种疾病,并鼓励对心理健康专业人员进行这种治疗方法的培训。此外,保险计划报销员工的焦虑障碍心理治疗费用将是有利的。对进一步研究的启示:除了减轻症状外,探索哪些因素有助于减少直接和间接的心理健康相关成本将是非常有针对性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reduction in Costs after Treating Comorbid Panic Disorder with Agoraphobia and Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

Background: Panic disorder with agoraphobia (PDA) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are impairing and costly disorders that are often misdiagnosed and left untreated despite multiple consultations. These disorders frequently co-occur, but little is known about the costs associated with their comorbidity and the impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) on cost reduction.

Aims of the study: The first objective of this study was to assess the mental health-related costs associated with the specific concomitance of PDA and GAD. The second aim was to determine whether there is a reduction in direct and indirect mental health-related costs following conventional CBT for the primary disorder only (PDA or GAD) or combined CBT adapted to the comorbidity (PDA and GAD).

Methods: A total of 123 participants with a double diagnosis of PDA and GAD participated in this study. Direct and indirect mental health-related costs were assessed and calculated from a societal perspective at the pre-test, the post-test, and the three-month, six-month and one-year follow-ups.

Results: At the pre-test, PDA-GAD comorbidity was found to generate a mean total cost of CADUSD 2,000.48 (SD = USD 2,069.62) per participant over a three-month period. The indirect costs were much higher than the direct costs. Both treatment modalities led to significant and similar decreases in all cost categories from the pre-test to the post-test. This reduction was maintained until the one-year follow-up.

Discussion: Methodological choices may have underestimated cost evaluations. Nonetheless, this study supports the cost offset effects of both conventional CBT for primary PDA or GAD and combined CBT for PDA-GAD comorbidity.

Implications for healthcare provision and use: Treatment of comorbid and costly disorders with evidence-based treatments such as CBT may lead to considerable economic benefits for society.

Implications for health policies: Considering the limited resources of healthcare systems, it is important to make choices that will lead to better accessibility of quality services. The application of CBT for PDA, GAD or both disorders and training mental health professionals in this therapeutic approach should be encouraged. Additionally, it would be favorable for insurance plans to reimburse employees for expenses associated with psychological treatment for anxiety disorders.

Implications for further research: In addition to symptom reduction, it would be of great pertinence to explore which factors can contribute to reducing direct and indirect mental health-related costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信