提高分诊准确性:员工发展方法。

Carmen M Brosinski, Autumn J Riddell, Sherwin Valdez
{"title":"提高分诊准确性:员工发展方法。","authors":"Carmen M Brosinski,&nbsp;Autumn J Riddell,&nbsp;Sherwin Valdez","doi":"10.1097/NUR.0000000000000291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the process improvement initiative was to improve the percentage of undertriaged patients to less than 10% (benchmark) using the Emergency Severity Index tool. Undertriaged patients have an increased potential for poor outcomes due to a lengthier waiting room stay, which results in delay of care.</p><p><strong>Description of the project: </strong>An evidence-based project designed for staff development was conducted for a 7-month period. Project procedures consisted of triage chart reviews for a 3-month period during pre- and post-Emergency Severity Index training. Emergency Severity Index refresher training for nurses triaging in the emergency department was conducted for a 1-month period.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Chart reviews revealed that 102 of 388 patients (26.3%) were undertriaged before Emergency Severity Index training. After Emergency Severity Index training, chart reviews depicted that 41 of 440 patients (9.3%) were undertriaged. This difference was statically significant (P < .001), when tested using a 1-sided t test at the 95% confidence level and achieving at least 80% power.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Regardless of previous training or years of emergency department nursing experience, triage refresher training has been shown to increase accuracy of triage categorization, thus leading to a decreased risk of poor patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":145249,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nurse specialist CNS","volume":" ","pages":"145-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000291","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Triage Accuracy: A Staff Development Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Carmen M Brosinski,&nbsp;Autumn J Riddell,&nbsp;Sherwin Valdez\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NUR.0000000000000291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the process improvement initiative was to improve the percentage of undertriaged patients to less than 10% (benchmark) using the Emergency Severity Index tool. Undertriaged patients have an increased potential for poor outcomes due to a lengthier waiting room stay, which results in delay of care.</p><p><strong>Description of the project: </strong>An evidence-based project designed for staff development was conducted for a 7-month period. Project procedures consisted of triage chart reviews for a 3-month period during pre- and post-Emergency Severity Index training. Emergency Severity Index refresher training for nurses triaging in the emergency department was conducted for a 1-month period.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Chart reviews revealed that 102 of 388 patients (26.3%) were undertriaged before Emergency Severity Index training. After Emergency Severity Index training, chart reviews depicted that 41 of 440 patients (9.3%) were undertriaged. This difference was statically significant (P < .001), when tested using a 1-sided t test at the 95% confidence level and achieving at least 80% power.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Regardless of previous training or years of emergency department nursing experience, triage refresher training has been shown to increase accuracy of triage categorization, thus leading to a decreased risk of poor patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":145249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nurse specialist CNS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"145-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000291\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nurse specialist CNS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nurse specialist CNS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

目的:流程改进倡议的目的是使用紧急程度指数工具将分类不足的患者的百分比提高到10%以下(基准)。由于等候室停留时间较长,导致护理延误,因此未得到适当分诊的患者出现不良结果的可能性增加。项目描述:为员工发展设计了一个基于证据的项目,为期7个月。项目程序包括在紧急情况严重程度指数培训前后进行为期3个月的分类图表审查。对急诊科分诊护士进行为期1个月的急诊严重程度指数复习培训。结果:图表回顾显示,388例患者中有102例(26.3%)在紧急严重程度指数训练前被分类不足。在紧急严重程度指数培训后,图表回顾显示440名患者中有41名(9.3%)被分类不足。当在95%置信水平下使用单侧t检验并达到至少80%的功率时,该差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。结论:无论以前的培训或多年的急诊科护理经验,分诊复习培训已被证明可以提高分诊分类的准确性,从而降低患者预后不良的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Triage Accuracy: A Staff Development Approach.

Purpose: The purpose of the process improvement initiative was to improve the percentage of undertriaged patients to less than 10% (benchmark) using the Emergency Severity Index tool. Undertriaged patients have an increased potential for poor outcomes due to a lengthier waiting room stay, which results in delay of care.

Description of the project: An evidence-based project designed for staff development was conducted for a 7-month period. Project procedures consisted of triage chart reviews for a 3-month period during pre- and post-Emergency Severity Index training. Emergency Severity Index refresher training for nurses triaging in the emergency department was conducted for a 1-month period.

Outcome: Chart reviews revealed that 102 of 388 patients (26.3%) were undertriaged before Emergency Severity Index training. After Emergency Severity Index training, chart reviews depicted that 41 of 440 patients (9.3%) were undertriaged. This difference was statically significant (P < .001), when tested using a 1-sided t test at the 95% confidence level and achieving at least 80% power.

Implications: Regardless of previous training or years of emergency department nursing experience, triage refresher training has been shown to increase accuracy of triage categorization, thus leading to a decreased risk of poor patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信