Carmen M Brosinski, Autumn J Riddell, Sherwin Valdez
{"title":"提高分诊准确性:员工发展方法。","authors":"Carmen M Brosinski, Autumn J Riddell, Sherwin Valdez","doi":"10.1097/NUR.0000000000000291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the process improvement initiative was to improve the percentage of undertriaged patients to less than 10% (benchmark) using the Emergency Severity Index tool. Undertriaged patients have an increased potential for poor outcomes due to a lengthier waiting room stay, which results in delay of care.</p><p><strong>Description of the project: </strong>An evidence-based project designed for staff development was conducted for a 7-month period. Project procedures consisted of triage chart reviews for a 3-month period during pre- and post-Emergency Severity Index training. Emergency Severity Index refresher training for nurses triaging in the emergency department was conducted for a 1-month period.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Chart reviews revealed that 102 of 388 patients (26.3%) were undertriaged before Emergency Severity Index training. After Emergency Severity Index training, chart reviews depicted that 41 of 440 patients (9.3%) were undertriaged. This difference was statically significant (P < .001), when tested using a 1-sided t test at the 95% confidence level and achieving at least 80% power.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Regardless of previous training or years of emergency department nursing experience, triage refresher training has been shown to increase accuracy of triage categorization, thus leading to a decreased risk of poor patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":145249,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nurse specialist CNS","volume":" ","pages":"145-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000291","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Triage Accuracy: A Staff Development Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Carmen M Brosinski, Autumn J Riddell, Sherwin Valdez\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NUR.0000000000000291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the process improvement initiative was to improve the percentage of undertriaged patients to less than 10% (benchmark) using the Emergency Severity Index tool. Undertriaged patients have an increased potential for poor outcomes due to a lengthier waiting room stay, which results in delay of care.</p><p><strong>Description of the project: </strong>An evidence-based project designed for staff development was conducted for a 7-month period. Project procedures consisted of triage chart reviews for a 3-month period during pre- and post-Emergency Severity Index training. Emergency Severity Index refresher training for nurses triaging in the emergency department was conducted for a 1-month period.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Chart reviews revealed that 102 of 388 patients (26.3%) were undertriaged before Emergency Severity Index training. After Emergency Severity Index training, chart reviews depicted that 41 of 440 patients (9.3%) were undertriaged. This difference was statically significant (P < .001), when tested using a 1-sided t test at the 95% confidence level and achieving at least 80% power.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Regardless of previous training or years of emergency department nursing experience, triage refresher training has been shown to increase accuracy of triage categorization, thus leading to a decreased risk of poor patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":145249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nurse specialist CNS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"145-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000291\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nurse specialist CNS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nurse specialist CNS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving Triage Accuracy: A Staff Development Approach.
Purpose: The purpose of the process improvement initiative was to improve the percentage of undertriaged patients to less than 10% (benchmark) using the Emergency Severity Index tool. Undertriaged patients have an increased potential for poor outcomes due to a lengthier waiting room stay, which results in delay of care.
Description of the project: An evidence-based project designed for staff development was conducted for a 7-month period. Project procedures consisted of triage chart reviews for a 3-month period during pre- and post-Emergency Severity Index training. Emergency Severity Index refresher training for nurses triaging in the emergency department was conducted for a 1-month period.
Outcome: Chart reviews revealed that 102 of 388 patients (26.3%) were undertriaged before Emergency Severity Index training. After Emergency Severity Index training, chart reviews depicted that 41 of 440 patients (9.3%) were undertriaged. This difference was statically significant (P < .001), when tested using a 1-sided t test at the 95% confidence level and achieving at least 80% power.
Implications: Regardless of previous training or years of emergency department nursing experience, triage refresher training has been shown to increase accuracy of triage categorization, thus leading to a decreased risk of poor patient outcomes.