注射孕激素避孕与铜宫内节育器避孕对艾滋病毒感染的影响:实用随机对照试验的子研究。

Q Medicine
G Justus Hofmeyr, Mandisa Singata-Madliki, Theresa A Lawrie, Eduardo Bergel, Marleen Temmerman
{"title":"注射孕激素避孕与铜宫内节育器避孕对艾滋病毒感染的影响:实用随机对照试验的子研究。","authors":"G Justus Hofmeyr, Mandisa Singata-Madliki, Theresa A Lawrie, Eduardo Bergel, Marleen Temmerman","doi":"10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence from observational studies suggests an increased risk of HIV acquisition among women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) contraception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within the context of a South African programme to increase women's access to the intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD), we conducted a pragmatic, open-label, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the IUD versus injectable progestogen contraception (IPC) at two South African hospitals. The primary outcome was pregnancy; secondary outcomes included HIV acquisition. Consenting women attending termination of pregnancy services were randomised after pregnancy termination between July 2009 and November 2012. Condoms were promoted for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. Voluntary HIV testing was offered at baseline and at 12 or more months later. Findings on HIV acquisition are reported in this article.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HIV acquisition data were available for 1290 initially HIV-negative women who underwent a final study interview at a median of 20 months after randomisation to IPC or an IUD. Baseline group characteristics were comparable. In the IPC group, 545/656 (83%) of participants received DMPA, 96 (15%) received injectable norethisterone enanthate, 14 (2%) received the IUD and one received oral contraception. In the IUD group 609 (96%) received the IUD, 20 (3%) received IPC and 5 (1%) had missing data. According to intention-to-treat analysis, HIV acquisition occurred in 20/656 (3.0%) women in the IPC arm and 22/634 (3.5%) women in the IUD arm (IPC vs IUD, risk ratio 0.88; 95% confidence interval 0.48-1.59; <i>p</i>=0.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This sub-study was underpowered to rule out moderate differences in HIV risk, but confirms the feasibility of randomised trial methodology to address this question. Larger RCTs are needed to determine the relative risks of various contraceptive methods on HIV acquisition with greater precision.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number PACTR201409000880157 (04-09-2014).</p>","PeriodicalId":15734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care","volume":"43 3","pages":"175-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/99/jfprhc-2016-101607.PMC5537534.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of injectable progestogen contraception versus the copper intrauterine device on HIV acquisition: sub-study of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"G Justus Hofmeyr, Mandisa Singata-Madliki, Theresa A Lawrie, Eduardo Bergel, Marleen Temmerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence from observational studies suggests an increased risk of HIV acquisition among women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) contraception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within the context of a South African programme to increase women's access to the intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD), we conducted a pragmatic, open-label, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the IUD versus injectable progestogen contraception (IPC) at two South African hospitals. The primary outcome was pregnancy; secondary outcomes included HIV acquisition. Consenting women attending termination of pregnancy services were randomised after pregnancy termination between July 2009 and November 2012. Condoms were promoted for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. Voluntary HIV testing was offered at baseline and at 12 or more months later. Findings on HIV acquisition are reported in this article.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HIV acquisition data were available for 1290 initially HIV-negative women who underwent a final study interview at a median of 20 months after randomisation to IPC or an IUD. Baseline group characteristics were comparable. In the IPC group, 545/656 (83%) of participants received DMPA, 96 (15%) received injectable norethisterone enanthate, 14 (2%) received the IUD and one received oral contraception. In the IUD group 609 (96%) received the IUD, 20 (3%) received IPC and 5 (1%) had missing data. According to intention-to-treat analysis, HIV acquisition occurred in 20/656 (3.0%) women in the IPC arm and 22/634 (3.5%) women in the IUD arm (IPC vs IUD, risk ratio 0.88; 95% confidence interval 0.48-1.59; <i>p</i>=0.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This sub-study was underpowered to rule out moderate differences in HIV risk, but confirms the feasibility of randomised trial methodology to address this question. Larger RCTs are needed to determine the relative risks of various contraceptive methods on HIV acquisition with greater precision.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number PACTR201409000880157 (04-09-2014).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"175-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/99/jfprhc-2016-101607.PMC5537534.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/4/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:观察性研究的证据表明,使用醋酸甲地孕酮(DMPA)去势避孕法的女性感染艾滋病毒的风险增加:观察性研究的证据表明,使用醋酸甲羟孕酮(DMPA)去势避孕法的妇女感染艾滋病毒的风险增加:方法:在南非一项旨在增加妇女使用宫内避孕器(IUD)机会的计划背景下,我们在南非两家医院开展了一项宫内避孕器与注射孕激素避孕法(IPC)的务实、开放标签、平行臂随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果是怀孕;次要结果包括艾滋病感染。在 2009 年 7 月至 2012 年 11 月期间,经同意接受终止妊娠服务的妇女在终止妊娠后被随机分配。推广使用安全套预防性传播感染。在基线和 12 个月或更长时间后提供自愿 HIV 检测。本文报告了艾滋病毒感染的调查结果:1290名最初HIV阴性的女性在随机接受IPC或宫内节育器治疗20个月后接受了最终的研究访谈,并获得了HIV感染数据。各组的基线特征具有可比性。在 IPC 组中,545/656(83%)名参与者接受了 DMPA,96(15%)名接受了注射用庚酸炔诺酮,14(2%)名接受了宫内节育器,1 名接受了口服避孕药。宫内节育器组有 609 人(96%)接受了宫内节育器,20 人(3%)接受了 IPC,5 人(1%)数据缺失。根据意向治疗分析,20/656(3.0%)名接受 IPC 治疗的妇女和 22/634(3.5%)名接受宫内节育器治疗的妇女感染了艾滋病毒(IPC vs IUD,风险比 0.88;95% 置信区间 0.48-1.59;P=0.7):这项子研究的力量不足以排除 HIV 风险的中等差异,但证实了随机试验方法在解决这一问题上的可行性。要更精确地确定各种避孕方法对艾滋病感染的相对风险,还需要更大规模的随机试验:泛非临床试验注册编号:PACTR201409000880157(04-09-2014)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of injectable progestogen contraception versus the copper intrauterine device on HIV acquisition: sub-study of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Effects of injectable progestogen contraception versus the copper intrauterine device on HIV acquisition: sub-study of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Background: Evidence from observational studies suggests an increased risk of HIV acquisition among women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) contraception.

Methods: Within the context of a South African programme to increase women's access to the intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD), we conducted a pragmatic, open-label, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the IUD versus injectable progestogen contraception (IPC) at two South African hospitals. The primary outcome was pregnancy; secondary outcomes included HIV acquisition. Consenting women attending termination of pregnancy services were randomised after pregnancy termination between July 2009 and November 2012. Condoms were promoted for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. Voluntary HIV testing was offered at baseline and at 12 or more months later. Findings on HIV acquisition are reported in this article.

Results: HIV acquisition data were available for 1290 initially HIV-negative women who underwent a final study interview at a median of 20 months after randomisation to IPC or an IUD. Baseline group characteristics were comparable. In the IPC group, 545/656 (83%) of participants received DMPA, 96 (15%) received injectable norethisterone enanthate, 14 (2%) received the IUD and one received oral contraception. In the IUD group 609 (96%) received the IUD, 20 (3%) received IPC and 5 (1%) had missing data. According to intention-to-treat analysis, HIV acquisition occurred in 20/656 (3.0%) women in the IPC arm and 22/634 (3.5%) women in the IUD arm (IPC vs IUD, risk ratio 0.88; 95% confidence interval 0.48-1.59; p=0.7).

Conclusions: This sub-study was underpowered to rule out moderate differences in HIV risk, but confirms the feasibility of randomised trial methodology to address this question. Larger RCTs are needed to determine the relative risks of various contraceptive methods on HIV acquisition with greater precision.

Trial registration number: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number PACTR201409000880157 (04-09-2014).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.84
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The trading of Professional, Managerial & Healthcare Publications Ltd has been transferred to its parent company, Keyways Publishing Ltd.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信