卡格列净治疗2型糖尿病的循证评价

Core Evidence Pub Date : 2017-03-15 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CE.S109654
Thomas Karagiannis, Eleni Bekiari, Apostolos Tsapas
{"title":"卡格列净治疗2型糖尿病的循证评价","authors":"Thomas Karagiannis,&nbsp;Eleni Bekiari,&nbsp;Apostolos Tsapas","doi":"10.2147/CE.S109654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Deciding on an optimal medication choice for type 2 diabetes is often challenging, due to the increasing number of treatment options. Canagliflozin is a novel glucose-lowering agent belonging to sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine and summarize the evidence based on the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of canagliflozin for type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>Compared to placebo, canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg lower glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by ~0.6%-0.8%, respectively. Canagliflozin appears to be slightly more effective than dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in reducing HbA1c. It also has a favorable effect on body weight and blood pressure, both versus placebo and most active comparators. However, treatment with canagliflozin is associated with increased incidence of genital tract infections and osmotic diuresis-related adverse events. Based on short-term data, canagliflozin is not associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. Economic evaluation studies from various countries indicate that canagliflozin is a cost-effective option in dual- or triple-agent regimens.</p><p><strong>Place in therapy: </strong>As monotherapy, canagliflozin could be used in patients for whom metformin is contraindicated or not tolerated. For patients on background treatment with metformin, canagliflozin appears to be superior to sulfonylureas with respect to body weight, blood pressure and risk for hypoglycemia, and to DPP-4 inhibitors in terms of lowering HbA1c, body weight, and blood pressure. Canagliflozin also seems to be cost-effective compared with sulfonylureas and DPP-4 inhibitors as add-on to metformin monotherapy, and compared with DPP-4 inhibitors as add-on to metformin and sulfonylurea.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence on intermediate efficacy outcomes, short-term safety and cost-effectiveness support the use of canagliflozin in patients on background treatment with metformin. Robust long-term data regarding the effect of canagliflozin on cardiovascular endpoints will be available upon completion of the Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":10764,"journal":{"name":"Core Evidence","volume":"12 ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CE.S109654","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canagliflozin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Karagiannis,&nbsp;Eleni Bekiari,&nbsp;Apostolos Tsapas\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CE.S109654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Deciding on an optimal medication choice for type 2 diabetes is often challenging, due to the increasing number of treatment options. Canagliflozin is a novel glucose-lowering agent belonging to sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine and summarize the evidence based on the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of canagliflozin for type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>Compared to placebo, canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg lower glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by ~0.6%-0.8%, respectively. Canagliflozin appears to be slightly more effective than dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in reducing HbA1c. It also has a favorable effect on body weight and blood pressure, both versus placebo and most active comparators. However, treatment with canagliflozin is associated with increased incidence of genital tract infections and osmotic diuresis-related adverse events. Based on short-term data, canagliflozin is not associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. Economic evaluation studies from various countries indicate that canagliflozin is a cost-effective option in dual- or triple-agent regimens.</p><p><strong>Place in therapy: </strong>As monotherapy, canagliflozin could be used in patients for whom metformin is contraindicated or not tolerated. For patients on background treatment with metformin, canagliflozin appears to be superior to sulfonylureas with respect to body weight, blood pressure and risk for hypoglycemia, and to DPP-4 inhibitors in terms of lowering HbA1c, body weight, and blood pressure. Canagliflozin also seems to be cost-effective compared with sulfonylureas and DPP-4 inhibitors as add-on to metformin monotherapy, and compared with DPP-4 inhibitors as add-on to metformin and sulfonylurea.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence on intermediate efficacy outcomes, short-term safety and cost-effectiveness support the use of canagliflozin in patients on background treatment with metformin. Robust long-term data regarding the effect of canagliflozin on cardiovascular endpoints will be available upon completion of the Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Core Evidence\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CE.S109654\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Core Evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CE.S109654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Core Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CE.S109654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

导读:由于治疗方案越来越多,决定2型糖尿病的最佳药物选择往往具有挑战性。加格列净是一种新型降糖药物,属于钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2 (SGLT2)抑制剂。目的:本研究的目的是检查和总结基于卡格列净治疗2型糖尿病的有效性、安全性和成本效益的证据。证据回顾:与安慰剂相比,卡格列净100和300 mg分别使糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)降低~0.6%-0.8%。在降低HbA1c方面,卡格列净似乎比二肽基肽酶-4 (DPP-4)抑制剂更有效。与安慰剂和大多数活性比较物相比,它对体重和血压也有良好的影响。然而,卡格列净治疗与生殖道感染和渗透性利尿素相关不良事件的发生率增加有关。根据短期数据,卡格列净与全因死亡率和心血管结局的风险增加无关。来自不同国家的经济评估研究表明,在双药或三药方案中,卡格列净是一种具有成本效益的选择。用于治疗:作为单药治疗,卡格列净可用于二甲双胍禁忌症或不能耐受的患者。对于接受二甲双胍背景治疗的患者,在体重、血压和低血糖风险方面,canagliflozin似乎优于磺脲类药物,在降低HbA1c、体重和血压方面,canagliflozin优于DPP-4抑制剂。与二甲双胍单药治疗的磺脲类药物和DPP-4抑制剂相比,与二甲双胍和磺脲类药物的DPP-4抑制剂相比,Canagliflozin似乎也具有成本效益。结论:目前关于中期疗效结局、短期安全性和成本效益的证据支持在二甲双胍背景治疗的患者中使用卡格列净。关于卡格列净对心血管终点的影响的可靠的长期数据将在卡格列净心血管评估研究(CANVAS)试验完成后提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Canagliflozin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy.

Introduction: Deciding on an optimal medication choice for type 2 diabetes is often challenging, due to the increasing number of treatment options. Canagliflozin is a novel glucose-lowering agent belonging to sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors.

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine and summarize the evidence based on the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of canagliflozin for type 2 diabetes.

Evidence review: Compared to placebo, canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg lower glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by ~0.6%-0.8%, respectively. Canagliflozin appears to be slightly more effective than dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in reducing HbA1c. It also has a favorable effect on body weight and blood pressure, both versus placebo and most active comparators. However, treatment with canagliflozin is associated with increased incidence of genital tract infections and osmotic diuresis-related adverse events. Based on short-term data, canagliflozin is not associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. Economic evaluation studies from various countries indicate that canagliflozin is a cost-effective option in dual- or triple-agent regimens.

Place in therapy: As monotherapy, canagliflozin could be used in patients for whom metformin is contraindicated or not tolerated. For patients on background treatment with metformin, canagliflozin appears to be superior to sulfonylureas with respect to body weight, blood pressure and risk for hypoglycemia, and to DPP-4 inhibitors in terms of lowering HbA1c, body weight, and blood pressure. Canagliflozin also seems to be cost-effective compared with sulfonylureas and DPP-4 inhibitors as add-on to metformin monotherapy, and compared with DPP-4 inhibitors as add-on to metformin and sulfonylurea.

Conclusion: Current evidence on intermediate efficacy outcomes, short-term safety and cost-effectiveness support the use of canagliflozin in patients on background treatment with metformin. Robust long-term data regarding the effect of canagliflozin on cardiovascular endpoints will be available upon completion of the Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Core Evidence
Core Evidence PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Core Evidence evaluates the evidence underlying the potential place in therapy of drugs throughout their development lifecycle from preclinical to postlaunch. The focus of each review is to evaluate the case for a new drug or class in outcome terms in specific indications and patient groups The emerging evidence on new drugs is reviewed at key stages of development and evaluated against unmet needs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信