猫咬引起的土拉弗朗西斯菌感染与金塔纳巴尔通体血清学假阳性反应。

JMM case reports Pub Date : 2017-02-28 eCollection Date: 2017-02-01 DOI:10.1099/jmmcr.0.005071
Evelina Petersson, Simon Athlin
{"title":"猫咬引起的土拉弗朗西斯菌感染与金塔纳巴尔通体血清学假阳性反应。","authors":"Evelina Petersson,&nbsp;Simon Athlin","doi":"10.1099/jmmcr.0.005071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Tularaemia is caused by infection with <i>Francisella tularensis</i>transmitted via direct contact with an infected hare carcass or indirectly through the bites of vectors, but may be cat-bite-associated as well. Medical history and reliable diagnostic analysis are important in order to differentiate it from other cat-associated infections, e.g. <i>Bartonella</i> spp. <b>Case</b><b>presentation.</b> A healthy 56-year-old man was examined because of a cat-bite-associated ulceroglandular wound on his right thumb. Nineteen days after the cat bite occurred, a serology test was positive for anti-<i>Bartonella quintana</i>, but negative for anti-<i>F. tularensis</i>. Since <i>Bartonella</i> infections are rare in Sweden, another serology test was analysed 2 weeks later with a positive result for anti-<i>F. tularensis</i>. The patient was treated with doxycycline for 14 days and recovered. The patient was re-sampled after 18 months to obtain a convalescent sample. The acute and the convalescent samples were both analysed at a reference centre, with negative results for anti-<i>Bartonella</i> spp. this time. <b>Conclusion.</b> This case is enlightening about the importance of extending the medical history and re-sampling the patient for antibody detection when the clinical suspicion of cat-bite-associated tularaemia is high. The false-positive result for anti-<i>B. quintana</i> antibodies may have been due to technical issues with the assay, cross-reactivity or both.</p>","PeriodicalId":73559,"journal":{"name":"JMM case reports","volume":"4 2","pages":"e005071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361632/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cat-bite-induced <i>Francisella tularensis</i> infection with a false-positive serological reaction for <i>Bartonella quintana</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Evelina Petersson,&nbsp;Simon Athlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/jmmcr.0.005071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Tularaemia is caused by infection with <i>Francisella tularensis</i>transmitted via direct contact with an infected hare carcass or indirectly through the bites of vectors, but may be cat-bite-associated as well. Medical history and reliable diagnostic analysis are important in order to differentiate it from other cat-associated infections, e.g. <i>Bartonella</i> spp. <b>Case</b><b>presentation.</b> A healthy 56-year-old man was examined because of a cat-bite-associated ulceroglandular wound on his right thumb. Nineteen days after the cat bite occurred, a serology test was positive for anti-<i>Bartonella quintana</i>, but negative for anti-<i>F. tularensis</i>. Since <i>Bartonella</i> infections are rare in Sweden, another serology test was analysed 2 weeks later with a positive result for anti-<i>F. tularensis</i>. The patient was treated with doxycycline for 14 days and recovered. The patient was re-sampled after 18 months to obtain a convalescent sample. The acute and the convalescent samples were both analysed at a reference centre, with negative results for anti-<i>Bartonella</i> spp. this time. <b>Conclusion.</b> This case is enlightening about the importance of extending the medical history and re-sampling the patient for antibody detection when the clinical suspicion of cat-bite-associated tularaemia is high. The false-positive result for anti-<i>B. quintana</i> antibodies may have been due to technical issues with the assay, cross-reactivity or both.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMM case reports\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"e005071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361632/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMM case reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmmcr.0.005071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMM case reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmmcr.0.005071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

介绍。土拉菌病是由土拉杆菌感染引起的,通过直接接触受感染的野兔尸体或间接通过病媒叮咬传播,但也可能与猫咬有关。病史和可靠的诊断分析对于将其与其他猫相关感染(如巴尔通体)区分开来非常重要。一名56岁的健康男性因右拇指被猫咬伤导致腺溃疡而接受检查。猫咬伤发生19天后,血清学检测结果显示抗金巴通体阳性,但抗f抗体阴性。土拉杆菌内。由于巴尔通体感染在瑞典很少见,2周后对另一项血清学检测进行了分析,结果显示抗巴尔通体感染呈阳性。土拉杆菌内。患者经强力霉素治疗14 d后痊愈。患者在18个月后重新采样以获得恢复期样本。急性期和恢复期样本均在参考中心进行分析,这次抗巴尔通体呈阴性。结论。本病例对临床怀疑为猫咬相关土拉菌病的患者应延长病史并重新采样进行抗体检测具有一定的启示。抗b抗体的假阳性结果。昆塔纳抗体可能是由于化验技术问题,交叉反应性或两者兼而有之。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cat-bite-induced Francisella tularensis infection with a false-positive serological reaction for Bartonella quintana.

Introduction. Tularaemia is caused by infection with Francisella tularensistransmitted via direct contact with an infected hare carcass or indirectly through the bites of vectors, but may be cat-bite-associated as well. Medical history and reliable diagnostic analysis are important in order to differentiate it from other cat-associated infections, e.g. Bartonella spp. Casepresentation. A healthy 56-year-old man was examined because of a cat-bite-associated ulceroglandular wound on his right thumb. Nineteen days after the cat bite occurred, a serology test was positive for anti-Bartonella quintana, but negative for anti-F. tularensis. Since Bartonella infections are rare in Sweden, another serology test was analysed 2 weeks later with a positive result for anti-F. tularensis. The patient was treated with doxycycline for 14 days and recovered. The patient was re-sampled after 18 months to obtain a convalescent sample. The acute and the convalescent samples were both analysed at a reference centre, with negative results for anti-Bartonella spp. this time. Conclusion. This case is enlightening about the importance of extending the medical history and re-sampling the patient for antibody detection when the clinical suspicion of cat-bite-associated tularaemia is high. The false-positive result for anti-B. quintana antibodies may have been due to technical issues with the assay, cross-reactivity or both.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信