循证实践的扩散:美国和德语国家循证实践网络的回顾。

Christian Ghanem, Thomas R Lawson, Sabine Pankofer, Markos Maragkos, Ingo Kollar
{"title":"循证实践的扩散:美国和德语国家循证实践网络的回顾。","authors":"Christian Ghanem,&nbsp;Thomas R Lawson,&nbsp;Sabine Pankofer,&nbsp;Markos Maragkos,&nbsp;Ingo Kollar","doi":"10.1080/23761407.2017.1298074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence-based practice (EBP) has had a major influence on U.S. social work while it has rarely been adapted in German-speaking countries. This study investigates how knowledge about EBP is diffused within and across geographical contexts. Network analysis methods reveals different diffusion patterns and provide reasons for these differences. For example, the U.S. discourse is self-contained and based on a more homogeneous knowledge base, while the German discourse is more heterogeneous and focuses on a notion of reflexive professionalism. The different conceptual influences within the U.S. and German discourses are discussed in light of future directions of disciplinary social work.</p>","PeriodicalId":90893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","volume":"14 2","pages":"86-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761407.2017.1298074","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Diffusion of Evidence-Based Practice: Reviewing the Evidence-Based Practice Networks in the United States and German-Speaking Countries.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Ghanem,&nbsp;Thomas R Lawson,&nbsp;Sabine Pankofer,&nbsp;Markos Maragkos,&nbsp;Ingo Kollar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23761407.2017.1298074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Evidence-based practice (EBP) has had a major influence on U.S. social work while it has rarely been adapted in German-speaking countries. This study investigates how knowledge about EBP is diffused within and across geographical contexts. Network analysis methods reveals different diffusion patterns and provide reasons for these differences. For example, the U.S. discourse is self-contained and based on a more homogeneous knowledge base, while the German discourse is more heterogeneous and focuses on a notion of reflexive professionalism. The different conceptual influences within the U.S. and German discourses are discussed in light of future directions of disciplinary social work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evidence-informed social work\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"86-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761407.2017.1298074\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evidence-informed social work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2017.1298074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/3/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2017.1298074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

循证实践(EBP)对美国社会工作产生了重大影响,但在德语国家却很少被采用。本研究调查了关于EBP的知识是如何在地理环境内和跨地理环境传播的。网络分析方法揭示了不同的扩散模式,并提供了这些差异的原因。例如,美国的话语是自成一体的,基于更同质的知识基础,而德国的话语则更异质,侧重于反身性专业主义的概念。在美国和德国的话语中,不同的概念影响根据学科社会工作的未来方向进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Diffusion of Evidence-Based Practice: Reviewing the Evidence-Based Practice Networks in the United States and German-Speaking Countries.

Evidence-based practice (EBP) has had a major influence on U.S. social work while it has rarely been adapted in German-speaking countries. This study investigates how knowledge about EBP is diffused within and across geographical contexts. Network analysis methods reveals different diffusion patterns and provide reasons for these differences. For example, the U.S. discourse is self-contained and based on a more homogeneous knowledge base, while the German discourse is more heterogeneous and focuses on a notion of reflexive professionalism. The different conceptual influences within the U.S. and German discourses are discussed in light of future directions of disciplinary social work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信