经尿道前列腺和膀胱手术中尿道道形态和阴茎生物测量的影响评估。

IF 1.8 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Advances in Urology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-02-19 DOI:10.1155/2017/6321702
Rodrigo Ribeiro Vieiralves, Paulo Henrique Pereira Conte, Eduardo Medina Felici, Nádia Cristina Pinheiro Rodrigues, Tomás Accioly de Souza, Francisco J B Sampaio, Luciano Alves Favorito
{"title":"经尿道前列腺和膀胱手术中尿道道形态和阴茎生物测量的影响评估。","authors":"Rodrigo Ribeiro Vieiralves,&nbsp;Paulo Henrique Pereira Conte,&nbsp;Eduardo Medina Felici,&nbsp;Nádia Cristina Pinheiro Rodrigues,&nbsp;Tomás Accioly de Souza,&nbsp;Francisco J B Sampaio,&nbsp;Luciano Alves Favorito","doi":"10.1155/2017/6321702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. To analyze the penile and urethral meatus biometry and its correlation with meatoplasty during endoscopic resections. We also propose a new classification for urethral meatus morphology. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. We prospectively studied 105 patients who underwent prostate and bladder transurethral resections. We performed standardized measurement of penile and urethral meatus biometry followed by penile photo in the front position. The need to perform meatoplasty or dilatation during resectoscope introduction was registered. Data were analyzed comparing the correlation between two groups: without intervention (Group A) and with intervention (Group B). <i>Results</i>. We observed in Group A and Group B, respectively, the average length of urethral meatus of 1.07 cm versus 0.75 cm (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and average width of urethral meatus of 0.59 cm versus 0.38 cm (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Considering the morphology of the urethral meatus, we propose a new classification, in the following groups: (a) typical; (b) slit; (c) point-like; (d) horseshoe; and (e) megameatus. The point-like meatus was the one that most needed intervention, followed by the slit and the typical meatus (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>Conclusions</i>. Point-like and slit-shaped urethral meatus, as well as reduced length and width of the urethral meatus, are the determining factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":7490,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/6321702","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact Assessment of Urethral Meatus Morphology and Penile Biometry in Transurethral Prostate and Bladder Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Ribeiro Vieiralves,&nbsp;Paulo Henrique Pereira Conte,&nbsp;Eduardo Medina Felici,&nbsp;Nádia Cristina Pinheiro Rodrigues,&nbsp;Tomás Accioly de Souza,&nbsp;Francisco J B Sampaio,&nbsp;Luciano Alves Favorito\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2017/6321702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. To analyze the penile and urethral meatus biometry and its correlation with meatoplasty during endoscopic resections. We also propose a new classification for urethral meatus morphology. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. We prospectively studied 105 patients who underwent prostate and bladder transurethral resections. We performed standardized measurement of penile and urethral meatus biometry followed by penile photo in the front position. The need to perform meatoplasty or dilatation during resectoscope introduction was registered. Data were analyzed comparing the correlation between two groups: without intervention (Group A) and with intervention (Group B). <i>Results</i>. We observed in Group A and Group B, respectively, the average length of urethral meatus of 1.07 cm versus 0.75 cm (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and average width of urethral meatus of 0.59 cm versus 0.38 cm (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Considering the morphology of the urethral meatus, we propose a new classification, in the following groups: (a) typical; (b) slit; (c) point-like; (d) horseshoe; and (e) megameatus. The point-like meatus was the one that most needed intervention, followed by the slit and the typical meatus (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>Conclusions</i>. Point-like and slit-shaped urethral meatus, as well as reduced length and width of the urethral meatus, are the determining factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/6321702\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6321702\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6321702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目标。目的:分析内窥镜手术中阴茎和尿道道口生物测量及其与成形术的相关性。我们还提出了一种新的尿道道形态分类。材料与方法。我们前瞻性研究了105例经尿道前列腺和膀胱切除术的患者。我们对阴茎和尿道道进行了标准化的生物测量,并在前位拍摄了阴茎照片。需要进行肉成形术或扩张在切除镜引进登记。比较无干预组(A组)和有干预组(B组)两组数据的相关性。我们观察到A组和B组尿道道平均长度分别为1.07 cm和0.75 cm (p < 0.001),尿道道平均宽度分别为0.59 cm和0.38 cm (p < 0.001)。考虑到尿道道的形态,我们提出了一个新的分类,分为以下几组:(a)典型;(b)缝;(c)点状;(d)马蹄铁;(e)巨gameatus。点状道是最需要干预的道,其次是狭缝道和典型道(p < 0.001)。结论。点状和狭缝状尿道道以及尿道道长度和宽度减小是决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact Assessment of Urethral Meatus Morphology and Penile Biometry in Transurethral Prostate and Bladder Surgery.

Impact Assessment of Urethral Meatus Morphology and Penile Biometry in Transurethral Prostate and Bladder Surgery.

Objective. To analyze the penile and urethral meatus biometry and its correlation with meatoplasty during endoscopic resections. We also propose a new classification for urethral meatus morphology. Materials and Methods. We prospectively studied 105 patients who underwent prostate and bladder transurethral resections. We performed standardized measurement of penile and urethral meatus biometry followed by penile photo in the front position. The need to perform meatoplasty or dilatation during resectoscope introduction was registered. Data were analyzed comparing the correlation between two groups: without intervention (Group A) and with intervention (Group B). Results. We observed in Group A and Group B, respectively, the average length of urethral meatus of 1.07 cm versus 0.75 cm (p < 0.001) and average width of urethral meatus of 0.59 cm versus 0.38 cm (p < 0.001). Considering the morphology of the urethral meatus, we propose a new classification, in the following groups: (a) typical; (b) slit; (c) point-like; (d) horseshoe; and (e) megameatus. The point-like meatus was the one that most needed intervention, followed by the slit and the typical meatus (p < 0.001). Conclusions. Point-like and slit-shaped urethral meatus, as well as reduced length and width of the urethral meatus, are the determining factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Urology
Advances in Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Urology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes state-of-the-art reviews and original research papers of wide interest in all fields of urology. The journal strives to provide publication of important manuscripts to the widest possible audience worldwide, without the constraints of expensive, hard-to-access, traditional bound journals. Advances in Urology is designed to improve publication access of both well-established urologic scientists and less well-established writers, by allowing interested scientists worldwide to participate fully.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信