Juan C Rueda, Sofia Arias-Correal, Andres Y Vasquez, Enrique Calvo, Paola Peña, Marlon Porras, Jose-Ignacio Angarita, Eugenia-Lucia Saldarriaga, Ana M Santos, John Londono
{"title":"脊柱关节炎患者骶髂关节的磁共振观察一致性。","authors":"Juan C Rueda, Sofia Arias-Correal, Andres Y Vasquez, Enrique Calvo, Paola Peña, Marlon Porras, Jose-Ignacio Angarita, Eugenia-Lucia Saldarriaga, Ana M Santos, John Londono","doi":"10.1155/2017/3143069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>. Clinical, laboratory, and radiologic parameters are used for diagnosis and classification of spondyloarthritis (SpA). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of sacroiliac (SI) joints is being increasingly used to detect early sacroiliitis. We decided to evaluate the interobserver agreement in MRI findings of SI joints of SpA patients between a local radiologist, a rheumatologist, and an expert radiologist in musculoskeletal diseases. <i>Methods</i>. 66 MRI images of the SI joints of patients with established diagnosis of SpA were evaluated. Agreement was expressed in Cohen's kappa. <i>Results</i>. Interobserver agreement between a local radiologist and an expert radiologist was fair (<i>κ</i> = 0.37). Only acute findings showed a moderate agreement (<i>κ</i> = 0.45), while chronic findings revealed 76.5% of disagreement (<i>κ</i> = 0.31). A fair agreement was observed in acute findings (<i>κ</i> = 0.38) as well as chronic findings (<i>κ</i> = 0.38) between a local radiologist and a rheumatologist. There was a substantial agreement between an expert radiologist and a rheumatologist (<i>κ</i> = 0.73). In acute findings, a 100% agreement was achieved. Also chronic and acute plus chronic findings showed high levels of agreement (<i>κ</i> = 0.73 and 0.62, resp.). <i>Conclusions</i>. Our study shows that rheumatologists may have similar MRI interpretations of SI joints in SpA patients as an expert radiologist.</p>","PeriodicalId":51715,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"2017 ","pages":"3143069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/3143069","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interobserver Agreement in Magnetic Resonance of the Sacroiliac Joints in Patients with Spondyloarthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Juan C Rueda, Sofia Arias-Correal, Andres Y Vasquez, Enrique Calvo, Paola Peña, Marlon Porras, Jose-Ignacio Angarita, Eugenia-Lucia Saldarriaga, Ana M Santos, John Londono\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2017/3143069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background</i>. Clinical, laboratory, and radiologic parameters are used for diagnosis and classification of spondyloarthritis (SpA). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of sacroiliac (SI) joints is being increasingly used to detect early sacroiliitis. We decided to evaluate the interobserver agreement in MRI findings of SI joints of SpA patients between a local radiologist, a rheumatologist, and an expert radiologist in musculoskeletal diseases. <i>Methods</i>. 66 MRI images of the SI joints of patients with established diagnosis of SpA were evaluated. Agreement was expressed in Cohen's kappa. <i>Results</i>. Interobserver agreement between a local radiologist and an expert radiologist was fair (<i>κ</i> = 0.37). Only acute findings showed a moderate agreement (<i>κ</i> = 0.45), while chronic findings revealed 76.5% of disagreement (<i>κ</i> = 0.31). A fair agreement was observed in acute findings (<i>κ</i> = 0.38) as well as chronic findings (<i>κ</i> = 0.38) between a local radiologist and a rheumatologist. There was a substantial agreement between an expert radiologist and a rheumatologist (<i>κ</i> = 0.73). In acute findings, a 100% agreement was achieved. Also chronic and acute plus chronic findings showed high levels of agreement (<i>κ</i> = 0.73 and 0.62, resp.). <i>Conclusions</i>. Our study shows that rheumatologists may have similar MRI interpretations of SI joints in SpA patients as an expert radiologist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"2017 \",\"pages\":\"3143069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/3143069\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3143069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3143069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interobserver Agreement in Magnetic Resonance of the Sacroiliac Joints in Patients with Spondyloarthritis.
Background. Clinical, laboratory, and radiologic parameters are used for diagnosis and classification of spondyloarthritis (SpA). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of sacroiliac (SI) joints is being increasingly used to detect early sacroiliitis. We decided to evaluate the interobserver agreement in MRI findings of SI joints of SpA patients between a local radiologist, a rheumatologist, and an expert radiologist in musculoskeletal diseases. Methods. 66 MRI images of the SI joints of patients with established diagnosis of SpA were evaluated. Agreement was expressed in Cohen's kappa. Results. Interobserver agreement between a local radiologist and an expert radiologist was fair (κ = 0.37). Only acute findings showed a moderate agreement (κ = 0.45), while chronic findings revealed 76.5% of disagreement (κ = 0.31). A fair agreement was observed in acute findings (κ = 0.38) as well as chronic findings (κ = 0.38) between a local radiologist and a rheumatologist. There was a substantial agreement between an expert radiologist and a rheumatologist (κ = 0.73). In acute findings, a 100% agreement was achieved. Also chronic and acute plus chronic findings showed high levels of agreement (κ = 0.73 and 0.62, resp.). Conclusions. Our study shows that rheumatologists may have similar MRI interpretations of SI joints in SpA patients as an expert radiologist.