增加过滤器以防止吸入有毒化合物对机械通气患者通气回路的影响。

Disaster and military medicine Pub Date : 2016-03-01 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40696-016-0015-6
Eliezer Be'eri, Simon Owen, Mark Shachar, Yaron Barlavie, Arik Eisenkraft
{"title":"增加过滤器以防止吸入有毒化合物对机械通气患者通气回路的影响。","authors":"Eliezer Be'eri,&nbsp;Simon Owen,&nbsp;Mark Shachar,&nbsp;Yaron Barlavie,&nbsp;Arik Eisenkraft","doi":"10.1186/s40696-016-0015-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Standard-issue Chemical-Biological-Radio-Nuclear (CBRN) gasmasks, as used for protection from non-conventional warfare agents or toxic industrial compounds, cannot be used by ventilated patients, leaving them exposed to toxic agents inhaled via their ventilators. This study was conducted to determine the safety of a CBRN filter added to the patient circuit of a ventilator, as a method for affording inhalational protection to ventilated patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Landrace pig was ventilated sequentially with 3 types of ventilators according to 17 different ventilation protocols, with and without a CBRN filters added in-line to the ventilation tubing for each protocol. For each protocol, physiological parameters, including oxygen saturation, inspired CO<sub>2</sub>, end tidal CO<sub>2</sub>, inspired oxygen, respiratory rate, and pulse rate, as well as airflow parameters including peak inspiratory pressure, positive end expiratory pressure and tidal volume were measured. The impact on the ventilator's trigger/sensitivity function was evaluated in vitro using a Michigan test lung.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, the addition of the CBRN filter resulted in a 16 ml (5 %) decrease (range 0-50 ml) in the tidal volume, a 1.7 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (10 %) decrease (range 1-3 cm H<sub>2</sub>O) in the peak inspiratory pressure, and a 0.1 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (3 %) decrease (range 0-1 cm H<sub>2</sub>O) in the positive end expiratory pressure delivered to the animal. Some ventilators compensated for these airflow changes while others did not, depending on the design of the ventilator's pressure/flow sensing mechanism. Significant rebreathing occurred when the filter was positioned directly on the animal's endotracheal tube, but not when positioned on the air outflow port of the ventilator. <i>In vitro</i> measurements showed that the addition of the CBRN filter added a mean pressure gradient of 0.45 cm H<sub>2</sub>O to the trigger/sensitivity function of the system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-line addition of a CBRN filter to ventilation tubing is a feasible strategy for affording inhalational protection to ventilated patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":91863,"journal":{"name":"Disaster and military medicine","volume":"2 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40696-016-0015-6","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of adding a filter for protection from toxic inhalational compounds to the ventilation circuit of mechanically ventilated patients.\",\"authors\":\"Eliezer Be'eri,&nbsp;Simon Owen,&nbsp;Mark Shachar,&nbsp;Yaron Barlavie,&nbsp;Arik Eisenkraft\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40696-016-0015-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Standard-issue Chemical-Biological-Radio-Nuclear (CBRN) gasmasks, as used for protection from non-conventional warfare agents or toxic industrial compounds, cannot be used by ventilated patients, leaving them exposed to toxic agents inhaled via their ventilators. This study was conducted to determine the safety of a CBRN filter added to the patient circuit of a ventilator, as a method for affording inhalational protection to ventilated patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Landrace pig was ventilated sequentially with 3 types of ventilators according to 17 different ventilation protocols, with and without a CBRN filters added in-line to the ventilation tubing for each protocol. For each protocol, physiological parameters, including oxygen saturation, inspired CO<sub>2</sub>, end tidal CO<sub>2</sub>, inspired oxygen, respiratory rate, and pulse rate, as well as airflow parameters including peak inspiratory pressure, positive end expiratory pressure and tidal volume were measured. The impact on the ventilator's trigger/sensitivity function was evaluated in vitro using a Michigan test lung.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, the addition of the CBRN filter resulted in a 16 ml (5 %) decrease (range 0-50 ml) in the tidal volume, a 1.7 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (10 %) decrease (range 1-3 cm H<sub>2</sub>O) in the peak inspiratory pressure, and a 0.1 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (3 %) decrease (range 0-1 cm H<sub>2</sub>O) in the positive end expiratory pressure delivered to the animal. Some ventilators compensated for these airflow changes while others did not, depending on the design of the ventilator's pressure/flow sensing mechanism. Significant rebreathing occurred when the filter was positioned directly on the animal's endotracheal tube, but not when positioned on the air outflow port of the ventilator. <i>In vitro</i> measurements showed that the addition of the CBRN filter added a mean pressure gradient of 0.45 cm H<sub>2</sub>O to the trigger/sensitivity function of the system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-line addition of a CBRN filter to ventilation tubing is a feasible strategy for affording inhalational protection to ventilated patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disaster and military medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40696-016-0015-6\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disaster and military medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40696-016-0015-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster and military medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40696-016-0015-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:用于防范非常规战剂或有毒工业化合物的标准发行的化学-生物-放射性-核(CBRN)防毒面具不能供使用通风设备的患者使用,使他们暴露于通过呼吸机吸入的有毒物质。本研究旨在确定在呼吸机患者回路中添加CBRN过滤器的安全性,作为一种为通气患者提供吸入保护的方法。方法:按17种不同的通气方案,使用3种类型的呼吸机对长白猪进行顺序通气,每种方案在通气管中添加或不添加CBRN过滤器。对于每个方案,测量生理参数,包括血氧饱和度、吸入二氧化碳、末潮二氧化碳、吸入氧气、呼吸频率、脉搏率,以及气流参数,包括吸气峰值压力、呼气末正压和潮气量。使用密歇根试验肺体外评估对呼吸机触发/敏感功能的影响。结果:平均而言,添加CBRN过滤器导致潮气量减少16 ml(5%)(范围0-50 ml),峰值吸气压力减少1.7 cm H2O(10%)(范围1-3 cm H2O),动物呼气末正压减少0.1 cm H2O(3%)(范围0-1 cm H2O)。一些通风机补偿了这些气流变化,而另一些则没有,这取决于通风机的压力/流量传感机制的设计。当过滤器直接放置在动物的气管内管上时,发生明显的再呼吸,而当过滤器放置在呼吸机的出风口上时,则没有发生明显的再呼吸。体外测试表明,CBRN过滤器的加入使系统的触发/灵敏度函数平均增加了0.45 cm H2O的压力梯度。结论:在通气管中在线添加CBRN过滤器是为通气患者提供吸入保护的可行策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of adding a filter for protection from toxic inhalational compounds to the ventilation circuit of mechanically ventilated patients.

Impact of adding a filter for protection from toxic inhalational compounds to the ventilation circuit of mechanically ventilated patients.

Impact of adding a filter for protection from toxic inhalational compounds to the ventilation circuit of mechanically ventilated patients.

Impact of adding a filter for protection from toxic inhalational compounds to the ventilation circuit of mechanically ventilated patients.

Background: Standard-issue Chemical-Biological-Radio-Nuclear (CBRN) gasmasks, as used for protection from non-conventional warfare agents or toxic industrial compounds, cannot be used by ventilated patients, leaving them exposed to toxic agents inhaled via their ventilators. This study was conducted to determine the safety of a CBRN filter added to the patient circuit of a ventilator, as a method for affording inhalational protection to ventilated patients.

Methods: A Landrace pig was ventilated sequentially with 3 types of ventilators according to 17 different ventilation protocols, with and without a CBRN filters added in-line to the ventilation tubing for each protocol. For each protocol, physiological parameters, including oxygen saturation, inspired CO2, end tidal CO2, inspired oxygen, respiratory rate, and pulse rate, as well as airflow parameters including peak inspiratory pressure, positive end expiratory pressure and tidal volume were measured. The impact on the ventilator's trigger/sensitivity function was evaluated in vitro using a Michigan test lung.

Results: On average, the addition of the CBRN filter resulted in a 16 ml (5 %) decrease (range 0-50 ml) in the tidal volume, a 1.7 cm H2O (10 %) decrease (range 1-3 cm H2O) in the peak inspiratory pressure, and a 0.1 cm H2O (3 %) decrease (range 0-1 cm H2O) in the positive end expiratory pressure delivered to the animal. Some ventilators compensated for these airflow changes while others did not, depending on the design of the ventilator's pressure/flow sensing mechanism. Significant rebreathing occurred when the filter was positioned directly on the animal's endotracheal tube, but not when positioned on the air outflow port of the ventilator. In vitro measurements showed that the addition of the CBRN filter added a mean pressure gradient of 0.45 cm H2O to the trigger/sensitivity function of the system.

Conclusions: In-line addition of a CBRN filter to ventilation tubing is a feasible strategy for affording inhalational protection to ventilated patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信