战斗伤亡者失血性休克的液体复苏

Disaster and military medicine Pub Date : 2017-01-17 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40696-017-0030-2
Parli R Ravi, Bipin Puri
{"title":"战斗伤亡者失血性休克的液体复苏","authors":"Parli R Ravi,&nbsp;Bipin Puri","doi":"10.1186/s40696-017-0030-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This brief update reviews the recent literature available on fluid resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock and considers the applicability of this evidence for use in resuscitation of combat casualties in the combat casualty care (CCC) environment. A number of changes need to be incorporated in the CCC guidelines: (1) dried plasma (DP) is added as an option when other blood components or whole blood are not available; (2) the wording is clarified to emphasize that Hetastarch is a less desirable option than whole blood, blood components, or DP and should be used only when these preferred options are not available; (3) the use of blood products in certain tactical field care settings where this option might be feasible (FSC, GH) is discussed; (4) 1:1:1 damage control resuscitation (DCR) with plasma: packed red blood cells (PRBC): platelets is preferred to 1:1 DCR with plasma: PRBC when platelets are available; and (5) the 30-min wait between increments of resuscitation fluid administered to achieve clinical improvement or target blood pressure has been eliminated. Also included is an order of precedence for resuscitation fluid options. There should be an emphasis on hypotensive resuscitation in order to minimize (1) interference with the body's hemostatic response and (2) the risk of complications of over resuscitation. Hetastarch is retained as the preferred option over crystalloids when blood products are not available because of its smaller volume and the potential for long evacuations in the military setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":91863,"journal":{"name":"Disaster and military medicine","volume":"3 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40696-017-0030-2","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluid resuscitation in haemorrhagic shock in combat casualties.\",\"authors\":\"Parli R Ravi,&nbsp;Bipin Puri\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40696-017-0030-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This brief update reviews the recent literature available on fluid resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock and considers the applicability of this evidence for use in resuscitation of combat casualties in the combat casualty care (CCC) environment. A number of changes need to be incorporated in the CCC guidelines: (1) dried plasma (DP) is added as an option when other blood components or whole blood are not available; (2) the wording is clarified to emphasize that Hetastarch is a less desirable option than whole blood, blood components, or DP and should be used only when these preferred options are not available; (3) the use of blood products in certain tactical field care settings where this option might be feasible (FSC, GH) is discussed; (4) 1:1:1 damage control resuscitation (DCR) with plasma: packed red blood cells (PRBC): platelets is preferred to 1:1 DCR with plasma: PRBC when platelets are available; and (5) the 30-min wait between increments of resuscitation fluid administered to achieve clinical improvement or target blood pressure has been eliminated. Also included is an order of precedence for resuscitation fluid options. There should be an emphasis on hypotensive resuscitation in order to minimize (1) interference with the body's hemostatic response and (2) the risk of complications of over resuscitation. Hetastarch is retained as the preferred option over crystalloids when blood products are not available because of its smaller volume and the potential for long evacuations in the military setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disaster and military medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40696-017-0030-2\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disaster and military medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40696-017-0030-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster and military medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40696-017-0030-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

这篇简短的更新回顾了最近关于失血性休克液体复苏的文献,并考虑了这一证据在战斗伤亡护理(CCC)环境中战斗伤亡复苏中的适用性。CCC指南需要进行一些修改:(1)在没有其他血液成分或全血时,增加干血浆(DP)作为一种选择;(2)澄清措辞,强调Hetastarch是比全血、血液成分或DP更不理想的选择,只有在无法获得这些首选选择时才应使用;(3)讨论了在某些战术现场护理环境中使用血液制品的可行性(FSC, GH);(4)血浆:红细胞(PRBC):血小板的1:1损伤控制复苏(DCR)优于血浆:血小板的1:1损伤控制复苏(DCR);(5)不再需要在增加复苏液之间等待30分钟才能达到临床改善或目标血压。还包括复苏液体选择的优先顺序。应该强调低血压复苏,以尽量减少(1)对身体止血反应的干扰和(2)过度复苏并发症的风险。在没有血液制品的情况下,由于其体积较小,并且在军事环境中可能需要长时间撤离,Hetastarch被保留为比晶体血液更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fluid resuscitation in haemorrhagic shock in combat casualties.

This brief update reviews the recent literature available on fluid resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock and considers the applicability of this evidence for use in resuscitation of combat casualties in the combat casualty care (CCC) environment. A number of changes need to be incorporated in the CCC guidelines: (1) dried plasma (DP) is added as an option when other blood components or whole blood are not available; (2) the wording is clarified to emphasize that Hetastarch is a less desirable option than whole blood, blood components, or DP and should be used only when these preferred options are not available; (3) the use of blood products in certain tactical field care settings where this option might be feasible (FSC, GH) is discussed; (4) 1:1:1 damage control resuscitation (DCR) with plasma: packed red blood cells (PRBC): platelets is preferred to 1:1 DCR with plasma: PRBC when platelets are available; and (5) the 30-min wait between increments of resuscitation fluid administered to achieve clinical improvement or target blood pressure has been eliminated. Also included is an order of precedence for resuscitation fluid options. There should be an emphasis on hypotensive resuscitation in order to minimize (1) interference with the body's hemostatic response and (2) the risk of complications of over resuscitation. Hetastarch is retained as the preferred option over crystalloids when blood products are not available because of its smaller volume and the potential for long evacuations in the military setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信