特立帕肽与阿仑膦酸钠治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性非随机临床研究。

Q3 Medicine
Gianfilippo Caggiari, Paolo Tranquilli Leali, Giulia Raffaella Mosele, Leonardo Puddu, Francesca Badessi, Carlo Doria
{"title":"特立帕肽与阿仑膦酸钠治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性非随机临床研究。","authors":"Gianfilippo Caggiari,&nbsp;Paolo Tranquilli Leali,&nbsp;Giulia Raffaella Mosele,&nbsp;Leonardo Puddu,&nbsp;Francesca Badessi,&nbsp;Carlo Doria","doi":"10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.3.200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this work we study the safety and effectiveness of teriparatide and alendronate in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture; it was a double-blinded and it was done by examining the comparisons between teriparatide 20 μg/day and alendronate 10 mg/day. Safety and effectiveness analyses were based on data from 355 woman with a mean age of 68 years. Two groups (A and B) with T-score ≤-2.5 at bone mineral density were analyzed and 3 or more vertebral fractures on radiograph. Group A: was treated with teriparatide 20 μg/day and composed from 182 women, in post-menopausal age, without a history of cancer. Group B: was treated with alendronate 10 mg/day composed from 173 women, postmenopausal age, with previous history of cancer (non-active during the study). Clinical evaluations were on bone turnover markers (alkaline phosphatase, procollagene type 1 <i>N</i>-terminal propeptide, and <i>N</i>-telopeptide cross-links), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and health-related quality of life (HrQoL). Safety was assessed by reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The results of this study imply that teriparatide comparated with alendronate has a favorable safety profile and is effective in the treatment of patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":47230,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism","volume":"13 3","pages":"200-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5318172/pdf/200-203.pdf","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and effectiveness of teriparatide <i>vs</i> alendronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective non randomized clinical study.\",\"authors\":\"Gianfilippo Caggiari,&nbsp;Paolo Tranquilli Leali,&nbsp;Giulia Raffaella Mosele,&nbsp;Leonardo Puddu,&nbsp;Francesca Badessi,&nbsp;Carlo Doria\",\"doi\":\"10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.3.200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this work we study the safety and effectiveness of teriparatide and alendronate in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture; it was a double-blinded and it was done by examining the comparisons between teriparatide 20 μg/day and alendronate 10 mg/day. Safety and effectiveness analyses were based on data from 355 woman with a mean age of 68 years. Two groups (A and B) with T-score ≤-2.5 at bone mineral density were analyzed and 3 or more vertebral fractures on radiograph. Group A: was treated with teriparatide 20 μg/day and composed from 182 women, in post-menopausal age, without a history of cancer. Group B: was treated with alendronate 10 mg/day composed from 173 women, postmenopausal age, with previous history of cancer (non-active during the study). Clinical evaluations were on bone turnover markers (alkaline phosphatase, procollagene type 1 <i>N</i>-terminal propeptide, and <i>N</i>-telopeptide cross-links), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and health-related quality of life (HrQoL). Safety was assessed by reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The results of this study imply that teriparatide comparated with alendronate has a favorable safety profile and is effective in the treatment of patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"200-203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5318172/pdf/200-203.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.3.200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.3.200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

在这项工作中,我们研究了特立帕肽和阿仑膦酸钠治疗绝经后骨质疏松症高危骨折患者的安全性和有效性;这是一项双盲试验,通过比较特立帕肽20 μg/d和阿仑膦酸钠10 mg/d来完成。安全性和有效性分析基于355名平均年龄为68岁的女性的数据。A、B两组骨密度t评分≤-2.5,x线片椎体骨折3处及以上。A组:给予特立帕肽20 μg/d治疗,182名绝经后年龄、无癌症病史的女性。B组:由173名绝经后年龄、既往有癌症病史(研究期间无活动)的妇女组成,给予阿仑膦酸钠10mg /天治疗。临床评估骨转换标志物(碱性磷酸酶、1型前胶原n端前肽和n端肽交联)、双能x线吸收仪和健康相关生活质量(HrQoL)。通过报告药物不良反应(adr)来评估安全性。本研究结果表明,与阿仑膦酸钠相比,特立帕肽具有更好的安全性,可有效治疗骨折高危骨质疏松症患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and effectiveness of teriparatide vs alendronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective non randomized clinical study.

In this work we study the safety and effectiveness of teriparatide and alendronate in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture; it was a double-blinded and it was done by examining the comparisons between teriparatide 20 μg/day and alendronate 10 mg/day. Safety and effectiveness analyses were based on data from 355 woman with a mean age of 68 years. Two groups (A and B) with T-score ≤-2.5 at bone mineral density were analyzed and 3 or more vertebral fractures on radiograph. Group A: was treated with teriparatide 20 μg/day and composed from 182 women, in post-menopausal age, without a history of cancer. Group B: was treated with alendronate 10 mg/day composed from 173 women, postmenopausal age, with previous history of cancer (non-active during the study). Clinical evaluations were on bone turnover markers (alkaline phosphatase, procollagene type 1 N-terminal propeptide, and N-telopeptide cross-links), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and health-related quality of life (HrQoL). Safety was assessed by reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The results of this study imply that teriparatide comparated with alendronate has a favorable safety profile and is effective in the treatment of patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism
Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal encourages the submission of case reports and clinical vignettes that provide new and exciting insights into the pathophysiology and characteristics of disorders related to skeletal function and mineral metabolism and/or highlight pratical diagnostic and /or therapeutic considerations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信